KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

An Animal Quarantine Policy Analysis with Environmental Law Study

Published date: Oct 31 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 8th Legal International Conference and Studies (LICS 2025): Corporate Responsibility and Environmental Law Through Economic & Business Management Practices

Pages: 589 - 598

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i27.20094

Authors:

Romauli B Simatupangulisimatupang11@gmail.comDoctoral of Law Program, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang

Abstract:

Environmental management in Indonesia is an essential part of the legal system aimed at protecting biodiversity and ecosystems. This study highlights animal quarantine policies as part of the conservation of biological natural resources based on Law No. 5 of 1990 concerning the Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and their Ecosystems and Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. In the context of globalization and economic integration, the quarantine system is required to be more adaptive and oriented toward comprehensive protection of national biological potential from external threats such as disease and pests. Quarantine policies must also integrate a socio-cultural approach, given the strong link between local culture and environmental sustainability. The symbolic interactionist approach is used in this study to uncover the symbolic meaning of law in response to social phenomena. It was found that existing quarantine regulations do not fully reflect ecological justice, as they still focus solely on technical aspects. Therefore, policy reconstruction is needed that is more sensitive to socio-cultural conditions and the principles of ecological justice.

Keywords: animal quarantine, biodiversity conservation, environment, protection

References:

[1] Syarif AR. Exploring Redd+ Implementation In Indonesia’s State Policies for Indigenous Peoples, Jakarta; 2010.

[2] Syamsul A. Aspek Hukum Perlindungan & Pengelolaan Lingkunagn Hidup. Medan: Area University Press; 2016.

[3] Disadur dari International Union for The Conservation of Nature, accessed from 21 June 2025, at 15.51 WIB

[4] Warassih E. “Keberagaman Bukan Keseragaman: Hukum Haruskah Memihak”, Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional dan Bedah Buku “Biarkan Hukum Mengalir”, FH-Undip Semarang, 25 May; 2008. http://seramoeprintstation. blogspot.co.id/2013/01/makalah-ekologi-pertanian.html, accessed from 21 June 2025, at 15.51 WIB

[5] Suryadarma IG. “Kawasan Sakral Perspektif Perlindungan Keanekaragaman Hayati”, dalam Situs Keramat Alami, ed., Herwasono Soedjito, Y. Purwanto, dan Endang Sukara, Jakarta; 2009.

[6] Beghin JC, Melatos M. The Trade and Welfare Impact of Australian Quarantine Policies: The Case of Pigmeat, Working Paper No. 11014, Iowa State University, Iowa, August; 2011.

[7] Bodley JH. Victims of Progress. California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1982.

[8] Kepala BP. Rusman Heriawan, in http://www.jpnn.com/berita.detail-57455, diakses pada tanggal 25 October 2012

[9] Koentjaraningrat, Kebudayaan Mentalitas dan Pembangunan ( Jakarta; 2004)

[10] Morschel JR. Introduction to Plant Quarantine. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing service; 1971.

[11] Safitri MA, Bosko RE. Indigenous Peoples/Ethnic Minorities and Poverty Reduction Indonesia, Manila; 2002.

[12] Nyoman Nurjaya, “Menuju Pengakuan Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam: Perspektif Antropologi Hukum”, Majalah Ilmiah Kertha Wicaksana FHUniv. Marwadewa Denpasar, 2009;Vol. 15 No. 2, July,

[13] Oscar Melo, Alejandra Engler, Laura Nahuehual, Gabriela Cofre, and Jose Barrena, Do Sanitary, Phytosanitary, and Quality-related Standard Affect International Trade Evidence from Chilean Fruit Exports, World Development, Vol. 54

[14] Wahana P. Nilai. Jogjakarta: Etika Aksiologis Max Scheler; 2004.

[15] Reza Banakar and Max Travers, Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research Oregon; 2005.

[16] Sastrodiharjo S. “Hukum Adat dan Realitas Penghidupan”, Hukum Adat dan Modernisasi Hukum, ed., M. Syamsudin, Yogyakarta; 1998.

[17] Wignjosoebroto S. Hukum yang tak Kunjung Tegak: Apa yang Salah dengan Kerja Penegakan Hukum di Negeri ini? In: Fredian D, et al., editors. Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta; 2012.

[18] Irianto S. ”Memperkenalkan Studi Sosiolegal dan Implikasi Metodologisnya”, Metode Penelitian Hukum-Konstelasi dan Refleksi, ed. Sulistyowati Irianto dan Shidarta, Jakarta; 2009.

[19] Suteki, “Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Tentang Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Sumber Daya Air Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Sosial: Studi Terhadap Privatisasi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air”, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum UNDIP, Semarang; 2008.

[20] Friedmann W. Teori dan Filsafat Hukum: Idealisme Folosofis dan Problema Keadilan (Susunan II), terj. Jakarta: Muhammad Arifin; 1994.

[21] Wicipto Setiadi, “Arah Perlindungan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Adat”, Makalah keynote speech dalam Seminar Nasional Arah Perlindungan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Adat dalam Sistem hukum Nasional, kerjasama BPHN-UNIBRAW, Malang, 12 May; 2011.

[22] Zamroni, Pengantar Perkembangan Teori Sosial, PT Tiara Wacana Yogya, Yogyakarta; 1992.