KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Corporate Responsibility for Greenwashing in Indonesian Law

Published date: Oct 31 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 8th Legal International Conference and Studies (LICS 2025): Corporate Responsibility and Environmental Law Through Economic & Business Management Practices

Pages: 333 - 351

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i27.20072

Authors:

‎ SahudiSahudi.std@unissula.ac.idDoctoral of Law Program, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang

Abstract:

Indonesia does not yet have specific and comprehensive regulations regarding greenwashing, existing legal frameworks such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, and environmental regulations can serve as a legal umbrella. This study aims to analyze how Indonesian law accommodates this practice and identify forms of corporate accountability, as well as provide recommendations for regulatory reform and increasing consumer awareness. Increasing public awareness is a crucial first step to ensuring truly sustainable and ethical business practices. This study adopts a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a comparative approach. This approach was chosen to address the legal vacuum in Indonesia and formulate normative recommendations through comparison with the legal frameworks in the UK and Australia. Primary legal data includes the 1945 Constitution, Broadcasting Law, Consumer Protection Law, ITE Law, Environmental Protection and Management Law, Job Creation Law (through Perppu 2/2022), PP on Food Labels and Advertisements, and PP on Electronic Trading. Secondary and tertiary data complement this qualitative-normative analysis, which includes organizing legal instruments, interpretation, synchronization with greenwashing practices, and corporate accountability analysis. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Indonesia’s legal framework for addressing greenwashing is still general and fragmentary, does not yet have specific regulations, and its implementation is highly dependent on the interpretation of general norms. Corporate responsibility for greenwashing in Indonesia is limited by the absence of specific regulations, minimal legal precedents, and weak enforcement mechanisms, which cause law enforcement to tend to be passive and ineffective. Referring to the more specific and proactive approach of Australian and British regulators—characterized by explicit definitions, detailed guidelines, aggressive law enforcement including significant financial sanctions—Indonesia needs to formulate specific anti-greenwashing regulations, issue detailed guidelines for business actors, strengthen law enforcement mechanisms with heavier sanctions, and intensify education and public awareness to create a fair market environment that supports true sustainability.

Keywords: consumer, corporate, protection, responsibility

References:

[1] Ahmed A, Vij DS, Qureshi S, Nargis S. Green Marketing or Greenwashing: An Illusion. International New York Academic Congress. 2022; (4), 17-22.

[2] Bustomi A. Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen. Jurnal Unpal. 2018;16(2):154–66.

[3] Chen YS, Chang CH. Greenwashing and Green trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk. J Bus Ethics. 2013;114(3):489–500.

[4] Cherian J, Jacob J. Green Marketing: A Study Consumers’ Attitude Towards Environment Friendly Products. Asian Soc Sci. 2012;8(12):117–26.

[5] Eleanora FN. Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Mutlak Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Ketentuan Pasal 27 UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Krtha Bhayangkara. 2018;12(2):207–28.

[6] Geng Y, Liu W, Li K, Chen H. Environmental Regulation and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. Energy Econ. 2021;99(105312):1–16.

[7] Ghassani MK, Rahman NA, Geraldine T, Murwani IA. The Effect of Greenwashing, Green Word of Mouth, Green Trust and Attitude towards Green Products on Green Purchase Intention. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute Journal. 2022;5(3):25508–20.

[8] Ksamawantara IM, Kosasih JI, Widyantara IM; I Made Aswin Ksamawantara; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih; I Made Minggu Widyantara. Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Penipuan Yang Dilakukan Broker Forex Ilegal. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. 2021;2(2):281–6.

[9] Lanthorn KR. It’s All About the Green: The Economically Driven Greenwashing Practices of Coca- Cola. Augsburg Honor Review. 2013;6(13):32–47.

[10] Lyon TP, Montgomery AW. The Means and End of Greenwash. Organ Environ. 2015;28(2):223–49.

[11] Moslehpour M, Chau KY, Du L, Qiu R, Lin CY, Batbayar B. Predictors of Green Purchase Intention Toward Eco-Innovation and Green Products: evidence from Taiwan. Economic Research-. Ekon Istraz. 2023;36(2):1–22.

[12] Mustamu J. Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pemerintah (Kajian Tentang Ruang Lingkup dan Hubungan Dengan Diskresi). Jurnal Sasi. 2014;20(2):21–7.

[13] Netto SV, Sobral MF, Ribeiro AR, Soares GR. Concepts and Forms of Greenwashing: A Systematic Review. Environ Sci Eur. 2020;32(19):1–12.

[14] Pranaharjo, A., Suharyono, & Wilopo. Pengaruh Green Advertising Terhadap Persepsi Tentang Green Brand dan Keputusan Pembelian (Survei pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Angkatan 2010 / 2011 Universitas Brawijaya Konsumen Air Minum Kemasan Merek ADES). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis S1 Universitas Brawijaya, 2013; 4(2): 1-9.

[15] Probokusumo, D. W. Pengaruh Green Advertising Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Dimediasi Persepsi Tentang Green Brand Pada Konsumen Molto Ultra Sekali Bilas. Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, 2014; 1-93.

[16] Pujari D, Dangelico RM. Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 2010;(95):471–86.

[17] Putra IM, Budiarta IN, Subamia IN. Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Consumer Dispute Resolution Through Peace. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. 2022;3(3):358–64.

[18] Riswanti AR. Tanggung Jawab Mutlak (Strict Liability) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Perdata Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Wicara. 2013;(1):1–5.

[19] Santoso MA. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup yang Dilakukan oleh Korporasi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum. 2016;7(2):216–28.

[20] Yildirim S. Greenwashing: a rapid escape from sustainability or a slow transition? LBS Journal of Management & Research; 2023.

[21] Shabbir MS, Sulaiman MA, Al-Kumaim NH, Mahmood A, Abbas M. Green marketing approaches and their impact on consumer behavior towards the environment—A study from the UAE. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(21):1–13.

[22] Shittu O. Emerging Sustainability Concerns and Policy Implications of Urban Household Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review. J Clean Prod. 2020; 246: 1–13.

[23] Sistem Cash on Delivery Pada Marketplace. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2002; 3(3): 379-385.

[24] Siswanto B. Perkembangan Konsep dan Penelitian Greenwashing: analisis Pustaka. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis. 2010;10(1):63–70.

[25] Zhang L, Li D, Cao C, Huang S. The Influence of Greenwashing Perception on Green Purchasing Intentions: The Mediating Role of Green Word-Of-Mouth and Moderating Role of Green Concern. J Clean Prod. 2018; 187: 740–50.

[26] Ayman Guirguis JM. The ACCC’s Eight Commandments for Environmental and Sustainability Claims and Avoiding Greenwashing and Breaches of the Australian Consumer Law. Retrieved from K&L Gates Hub: https://www.klgates.com/The- ACCCs-Eight-Commandments-for- Environmental-and-Sustainability-Claims-and- Avoiding-Greenwashing-and-Breaches-of-the-Australian- Consumer-Law-7-20- 2023;

[27] Browniewicz E. Environmental Goods and Services Sector. 9th International Scientific Conference Business and Management, 2016; 1-8.

[28] Loannou L, Kassinis G, Papagiannakis G. How Greenwashing Affects the Bottom Line. 2022; https://hbr.org/2022/07/how-greenwashing-affects-the- bottom-line

[29] Soekanto S. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2006.

[30] The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

[31] Criminal Code

[32] Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions

[33] Law Number 24 of 1997 concerning Broadcasting

[34] Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (PPLH).

[35] Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management

[36] Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law

[37] Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection

[38] Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 of 2009 concerning Hospitals – State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5072.

[39] Government Regulation Number 69 of 1999 concerning Food Labels and Advertising

[40] Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Trading Through Electronic Systems

[41] Green Business Bureau. SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production; 2021. https://greenbusinessbureau.com/topics/sdg/sdg-12-responsible-consumption-andproduction/

[42] Green Business Bureau. The Seven Sins of Greenwashing; 2021. Retrieved from Green Business Bureau: https://greenbusinessbureau.com/green-practices/theseven- sins-of-greenwashing/

[43] Greenpeace. (2022, April 12). Greenwash: What It Is and How Not to Fall for It. Retrieved from Greenpeace: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/what-isgreenwashing/

[44] Koons E. Energy Tracker Asia; 2022. Retrieved from Energy Tracker Asia: https://energytracker.asia/greenwashing-examples-of-top-companies/

[45] Elisa de Wit CF. ACCC Issues Guidance on Greenwashing; 2023. Retrieved from Norton Rose Fulbright: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/ publications/08a00e98/accc-issues-guidance-on-greenwashing#:~:text=The% 20term%20’greenwashing’%20refers%20to,or%20have%20no%20reasonable% 20bsis%E2%80%9D.&text=Greenwashing%20may%20(among%20other%20things

[46] KBBI. Tanggung Jawab. Retrieved from Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia; 2023. https://kbbi.web.id/tanggung%20jawab