KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Jun 20 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Technology 2024 (ICTLT 2024)

Pages: 213 - 222

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i12.18903

An an Andariandari.faqih@gmail.comFaculty of Tarbiyah, Universita Islam An-Nur, Lampung

The results of the initial study showed that many students at Islamic High School Hidayatul Mubtadiin have poor learning achievement, can be seen from the results of the final semester exams. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of the relationship between visual learning styles and student learning achievement, the magnitude of the influence of audio learning styles on student learning achievement, the magnitude of the relationship between visual learning styles and audio learning styles together on student learning achievement. The approach the correlational method. The sample used in this study was students Islamic High School Hidayatul Mubtadiin. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive with Pearson (product moment) relationship calculations. The results of this study are that visual learning styles have a relationship to student learning achievement at Islamic High School Hidayatul Mubtadiin. The magnitude of the audio learning style shows a sufficient and moderate relationship to student learning achievement, evidenced by r of 0.537. Visual learning and audio learning style together have a relationship to student learning achievement.

Keywords: visual learning style, audio learning style, learning achievement

[1] Dantas LA, Cunha A. An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2020.

[2] Berkowits, Rambe MS, Yarni N. The Influence of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Styles on Student Learning Achievement. J Rev Pendidik dan Pengajaran. 2019;2(2):291–6.

[3] Lwande C, Muchemi L, Oboko R. Identifying learning styles and cognitive traits in a learning management system [Internet]. Heliyon. 2021 Aug;7(8):e07701.

[4] Pardamean B, Suparyanto T, Cenggoro TW, Sudigyo D, Anugrahana A. AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. IEEE Access. 2022.

[5] Muslim F, Ekawarna E, Ramalia A, Wirayuda RP, Chen D. Learning Intensity and Visual Learning Style on Learning Outcomes. J Educ Res Eval; 2022.

[6] Bire AL, Geradus U, Bire J. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Tingkat Pemahaman Akuntansi dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Kependidikan. 2019;44(2):168–78.

[7] Phani Raghav L, Seshu Kumar R, Koteswara Raju D, Singh AR. Optimal Energy Management of Microgrids Using Quantum Teaching Learning Based Algorithm. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2021.

[8] Supit D, Melianti M, Lasut EM, Tumbel NJ. Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, Kinestetik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. J Educ. 2023;5(3):6994–7003.

[9] Fahmi MN. Putu Sudira, Lucky Al Hafzy. Quantum Teaching Learning Model Assisted Interactive Media: Does it affect Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill? Indones J Educ Res Rev; 2022.

[10] Rumapea G, dkk. Application of Quantum Teaching Learning Model to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Int J Nov Res Educ Learn. 2017;

[11] Zeng J. A theoretical review of the role of teacher professional development in EFL students’ learning achievement. Heliyon. 2023 Apr;9(5):e15806.

[12] Tokan MK, Imakulata MM. The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. S Afr J Educ. 2019;39(1):1–8.

[13] Jufrida J, Basuki FR, Kurniawan W, Pangestu MD, Fitaloka O. Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. Int J Eval Res Educ; 2019. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312.

[14] Rose P, Sayed Y. Assessing progress in tracking progress towards the education Sustainable Development Goal: Global citizenship education and teachers missing in action? Int J Educ Dev [Internet]. 2024;104(October 2023):102936. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102936.

[15] Darma E, Telaumbanua P, Harefa AR. Pages 691-697 Journal of Education Research. J Educ Res. 2024;5(1):691–7.

[16] Zheng L, Niu J, Zhong L, Gyasi JF. The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interact Learn Environ. 2023;31(9):5650–64.

[17] Lokare VT, Jadhav PM. An AI-based learning style prediction model for personalized and effective learning. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2024;51(November 2023):101421. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101421.

[18] Zagulova D, Prokofyeva N, Yulia K, Ziborova V, Katalnikova S, Popova Y. Personalization of Distance Learning: Using PLS-SEM for Analyzing the Possibility of Differentiating Students with the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model [Internet]. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;225:3077–85.

[19] Guo X, Liu Y, Tan Y, Xia Z, Fu H. Hazard identification performance comparison between virtual reality and traditional construction safety training modes for different learning style individuals [Internet]. Saf Sci. 2024;180(May):106644.

[20] Sayed AR, Khafagy MH, Ali M, Mohamed MH. Exploring the VAK model to predict student learning styles based on learning activity [Internet]. Intell Syst Appl. 2025;25( January):200483.