KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Jun 20 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Technology 2024 (ICTLT 2024)

Pages: 156 - 164

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i12.18886

Desy Merisa SusantiElementary Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

Ernawulan SyaodihElementary Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

Atep SujanaElementary Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

Creative thinking is a critical skill that drives innovation and problem-solving in various fields. This study aims to investigate the impact of the read, answer, discuss, explain, and create (RADEC) learning model on enhancing students’ creative thinking abilities. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved the application of RADEC in classroom settings to assess its effectiveness. Data collection was conducted using tests and observation sheets, with subsequent analysis performed through descriptive quantitative methods, difference tests, and n-gain calculations. The results indicate a significant improvement in students’ creative thinking across all indicators. Specifically, students demonstrated enhanced abilities in idea generation, problem-solving, and critical analysis. These findings suggest that the RADEC model is effective in fostering creative skills among students. The implications of this research highlight the potential of RADEC as a valuable instructional strategy in education, suggesting that its integration could lead to more innovative and adaptable learners.

Keywords: conceptual understanding, force, RADEC learning model

[1] Elfiani F. Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas vii f mt s ma’ arif nu 1 wangon melalui pembelajaran ideal problem solving. AlphaMath J Math Educ. 2017;3(2):27–35.

[2] Gralewski J, Karwowski M. Are teachers’ ratings of students’ creativity related to students’ divergent thinking? A meta-analysis. Think Skills Creativity. 2019;33(100583):1–17.

[3] Glăveanu VP. Educating which creativity? Think Skills Creativity. 2018;27(3):25–32.

[4] Cropley DH, Patston T, Marrone RL, Kaufman JC. Essential, unexceptional and universal: teacher implicit beliefs of creativity. Think Skills Creativity. 2019;34(100604):1–11.

[5] Wang L, Kokotsaki D. Primary school teachers’ conceptions of creativity in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Think Skills Creativity. 2018;29:115–30.

[6] Qian M, Plucker JA, Yang X. Is creativity domain specific or domain general? Evidence from multilevel explanatory item response theory models. Think Ski Creat. 2019;33(September 2018):100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571.

[7] Titikusumawati. et al. The effectiveness of the integration of openended and collaborative (OE-C) learning strategies in reducing gaps of elementary school students’ creative thinking skills. 2020;19(1):198–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/0.17051/ilkonline.2020.653653.

[8] Satriawan Y, Imega SD, Puspitasari YD. Penerapan model pembelajaran window shopping terhadap penguasaan konsep ipa siswa pada materi bunyi di smpn 1 rejoso kabupaten nganjuk. J Nat Scie and Ap. 2022;4(1):1–14.

[9] Jumanto SW. Kuncoro Y, Handayani H, Suryana N. The effect of radec model and expositorial model on creative thinking ability in. ICEE 2018 Int Conf Elem Educ Univ Pendidik Indones. 2018;561–7. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/83/79

[10] Sukardi RR, Sopandi W, Sutinah C, Yanuar Y, Suhendra I, Sujana A. Did online coaching increase teachers’ capability in implementing radec to stimulate pupils’ creativity in the topic of mixture separation and electricity? J Eng Sci Technol. 2021;16(Special Issue 6/2021):73–80. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special% 20Issue%20ASSEEE2021/AASSEEEC2021_10.pdf

[11] Sopandi W. The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and create learning model implementation. Proceeding 8th Pedagog Int Semin. 2017;8(October):132–9.

[12] Handayani H, Sopandi W, Syaodih E, Suhendra I, Hermita N. RADEC: an alternative learning of higher order thinking skills (HOTs) students of elementary school on water cycle. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1351(1):1–7.

[13] Khaerunnisah I, Sopandi W, Wahyu W. Implementation of problem-solving oriented RADEC learning model in colloidal material for the emergence of creative thinking skills of high school students. J Educ Sci. 2023;7(3):400.

[14] Ma’ruf AS, Wahyu W, Sopandi W. Colloidal learning design using radec model with stem. J Educ Sci. 2020;4(4):758–65.

[15] Latif BS, Sopandi W, Sujana A. Use of RADEC learning model on student’s creative thinking skills through social studies learning in elementary school. In: The 6th International Conference on Elementary Education. 2022. p. 104–12. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/3608

[16] Lestari A, Suhandi A. An Analysis of Hots in the 5th Grade Elementary School Students ’ Learning with RADEC Model with the Theme of “ Electricity Around Us “. Int Conf Elem Educ. 2020;2(1):1574–82. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/7849. Septinaningrum, Sopandi W, Agustin M, Gumala, Anggraeni P, Rahayu H, et al. Improving creative thinking ability of prospective elementary school teachers through read-answer-discuss-explain-and create (radec) projectoriented learning model. 2nd Int Conf Elem Educ. 2020;2(1):1298–308. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/750

[17] Septinaningrum, Sopandi W, Agustin M, Gumala, Anggraeni P, Rahayu H, et al. Improving Creative Thinking Ability of Prospective Elementary School Teachers through Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-and Create (RADEC) Project-Oriented Learning Model. 2nd Int Conf Elem Educ. 2020;2(1):1298–308.

[18] Sukardi RR, Sopandi W, Riandi, Beeth ME, Shidiq AS. Riandi, Beeth ME, Shidiq AS. What creative ideas came up about global warming in radec online class? Asia Pacific J Educ Educ. 2022;37(2):51–83.

[19] Suryana SI, Sopandi W, Sujana A, Pramswari LP. Creative thinking ability of elementary school students in science learning using the radec learning model. J Penelit Pendidik IPA. 2021;7(SpecialIssue):225–32. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1066.

[20] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Methods Approaches. Fifth Edit. California: SAGE Publications; 2018.

[21] Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Applying Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education; 2010.

[22] Apriwanda W, Hanri C. Level of creative thinking among prospective chemistry teachers. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2022;11(2):296–302.

[23] Hidayat T, Susilaningsih E, Cepi K. The effectiveness of enrichment test instruments design to measure students’ creative thinking skills and problem-solving. Think Skills Creativity. 2018;29:161–9.

[24] Yuniasih N, Sopandi W, Suhandi A, Syaodih E, Pratiwi W. Analysis of fifth grade students’ creative thinking skills through the implementation of radec learning. Elem Educ J. 2024;7(3):3083–92.

[25] Wulandari AY. Correlation between critical thinking and conceptual understanding of student’s learning outcome in mechanics concept. AIP Conf Proc. 2018;2014:020028.

[26] Siregar LS, Wahyu W, Sopandi W. Polymer learning design using read, answer, discuss, explain and create (radec) model based on google classroom to develop