Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

ISSN: 2008-322X

The latest research in clinical ophthalmology and vision science

Donor-implanted Guttata in Transplanted Corneal Tissue: Clinical Signs and Impact on Graft Survival

Published date: Sep 09 2025

Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

Issue title: ‎Volume 20 - 2025

Pages: 1 - 4

DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v20.15749

Authors:

Arthur Hammera.hammer@nhs.netMoorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London

Ammatul Takazaammatul.takaza@nhs.netSt George’s, University of London, London

Mark Lanemark.lane7@nhs.netMoorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London

Azizur RahmanMoorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London

Alfonso Vasquez-Perezalest99@gmail.comMoorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London

Abstract:

Purpose: To present our experience with patients who developed donor-implanted guttata (DIG) following uncomplicated corneal endothelial transplantation.

Case Report: Three patients who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty were diagnosed with DIG, which was confirmed by confocal microscopy. Two of the cases received corneas from the same donor and experienced delayed recovery of corneal transparency despite fully attached grafts.

Conclusion: Fuchs endothelial dystrophy is a common condition within the general population and is likely to be present in donor corneas. We assessed three cases of DIG, and the results highlight the need for improved screening of this condition prior to transplantation and its consideration in the early postoperative period if corneal edema is present despite graft attachment.

Keywords: Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty, Donor Implanted Guttata, Eye Bank Screening, Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy, Penetrating Keratoplasty

References:

1. Vedana G, Villarreal G Jr, Jun AS. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:321–330.

2. Sarnicola C, Farooq AV, Colby K. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Update on pathogenesis and future directions. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:1–10.

3. Nahum Y, Canton V, Ponzin D, Busin M. Prevalence of guttae in the graft following corneal transplantation. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:1660–1663.

4. Lorenzetti DW, Uotila MH, Parikh N, Kaufman HE. Central cornea guttata. Incidence in the general population. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;64:1155–1158.

5. Berger O, Kriman J, Vasquez-Perez A, Allan BD. Safetynet suture for aphakic Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2022;41:789–791.

6. Hara M, Morishige N, Chikama T, Nishida T. Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and noncontact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium. Cornea 2003;22:512–515.

7. Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Beuerman RW, Ohta T, Soliman H, Kaufman HE. Confocal microscopy in cornea guttata and Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:185–189.

8. Safi T, Daas L, Kiefer GL, Sharma M, Ndiaye A, Deru M, et al. Semiquantitative criteria in the eye bank that correlate with cornea guttata in donor corneas. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021;238:680–687.

9. Christopoulos V, Garner A. Emergence of cornea guttata in donor tissue: A cause of late graft failure. Eye (Lond) 1993;7:772–774.