KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

A Conceptual Paper: Moderating Effects of Metacognition and Gender on the Association between Emotion Regulation and Self-Efficacy Among Pre-Service Teachers

Published date: Jan 05 2021

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference of Psychology

Pages: 290–297

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i15.8218

Authors:

Yeoh Sun Weisunweiyeoh@siswa.um.edu.my Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Fonny Dameaty Hutagalung Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Chew Fong Peng Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract:

Pre-service teacher’s self-efficacy plays a vital role in Malaysia educational transformation. Emotion regulation influences one’s ability to cope with the stress and challenges. This research focuses on the two variables which determine pre-service teacher’s self-efficacy and emotion regulation. Metacognition enables pre-service teachers to rationally evaluate their own capability. It serves as an important tool in emotional regulation to engage pre-service teacher in cognitive re-appraisal process. Gender differences lead to different thinking style and emotion regulation strategies. Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and General Self-Efficacy (GSE) will serve as the instruments in this study. 133 pre-service teachers from Institute of Teacher Education Campus Bahasa Melayu will be selected using clustered random sampling method. The findings of this research can serve as a reference in teacher preparation process.

Keywords: metacognition, emotion regulation, self-efficacy, pre-service teacher, gender differences

References:

[1] Anderson, D., Nashon, S. M. and Thomas, G. P. (2009). Evolution of Research Methods for Probing and Understanding Metacognition. Research in Science Education, vol. 39, issue 2, pp. 181–195, doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9078-1.

[2] Baker, L. (2008). Metacognitive Development in Reading: Contributors and Consequences. In Kouider Mokhtari & Ravi Sheorey. (Eds), Reading Strategies of First-and Second-Language Learners: See How They Read. Oklahoma: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,. pp. 25–42. ISBN: 978-1933760186

[3] Bandura,A.(1977).Self-efficacy:TowardaUnifyingTheoryofBehavioralChange.PsychologicalReview, vol. 84, issue 2, pp. 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

[4] Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 307–337.

[5] Barthel, A. L., et al. (2018). Interpersonal Emotion Regulation: A Review of Social and Developmental Components. Behaviour Change, vol. 35, issue 4, pp. 203–216, doi: 10.1017/bec.2018.19.

[6] Bedel, E. F. (2008). Interactions among Attitudes toward Teaching and Personality Constructs in Early Childhood Pre-Service Teachers. Online Submission, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 31–48.

[7] Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and other More Mysterious Mechanisms. In Weinert F. E. & Kluwe R. Hillsdale (Eds), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

[8] Downing, K. J. (2009). Self-efficacy and Metacognitive Development. International Journal of Learning, vol. 16 (4). pp. 185-199. doi:10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i04/46214.

[9] Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, vol. 34, issue 10, p. 906.

[10] Garner, R. and Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions. Educational Psychologist, vol. 24, issue 2, pp. 143–158.

[11] Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, issue 3, pp. 271–299, doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.

[12] Gross, J. J. and John, O. P. (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 85, issue 2, pp. 348.

[13] Justice, E. M. and Weaver-McDougall, R. G. (1989). Adults’ Knowledge about Memory: Awareness and Use of Memory Strategies across Tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 81, issue 2, pp. 214– 219, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.214.

[14] Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P. and Klusewitz, M. A. (1993). College Students’ Conditional Knowledge about Reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, issue 2, p. 239, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.239.

[15] MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Integrating Mediators and Moderators in Research Design. Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 21, issue 6, pp. 675–681.

[16] Medrano, L. A., et al. (2016). Effects of Induction of Positive and Negative Emotional States on Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs in College Students. Psicología Educativa, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 135–141.

[17] Schraw, G. and Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 460–475.

[18] Schwarzer,R.andJerusalem,M.(1995).GeneralizedSelf-EfficacyScale.MeasuresinHealthPsychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 35–37.

[19] Tschannen-Moran, M. and Hoy, A. W. (2007). The Differential Antecedents of Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Novice and Experienced Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 23, issue 6, pp. 944–956.

[20] Zaki, J. and Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal Emotion Regulation. Emotion, vol. 13, issue 5, pp. 803–810, doi: 10.1037/a0033839.