Published date:Sep 28 2020

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Convention 2019 “Modernization and Multiple Modernities”

Pages:57–64

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i13.7697

Irina Vorontsovairavorontsova1@gmail.comCand. philol. sciences, Associate Professor, Russian State University for the Humanities (RGGU), Moscow, Russia

The vibrant dynamics of the educational realm are interfused by polylingual and polycultural flows and it is important to define and model new competencies in       the opening decades of the third millennium. This article offers a survey of key competencies united by the concept of ”new  literacy”,  or a form of post literacy    that is designed to help students succeed in the information culture and education sphere of the twenty-first century. These include training in: educational and cognitive competence, laying the groundwork for further education with the help of foreign languages; existential competence, which content are Soft Skills vs. Hard Skills; competence of social interaction; intercultural competence; information ethics, modeling a certain image of behavior in online communication; and information literacy. Media education is viewed as a tool for the formation of general cultural competence. This article accentuates the key function of foreign language in modeling the key skills of the twenty-first century, where the language is positioned as a mandate into other cultures and other pictures of life. Teaching foreign languages draws on the competence-based approach, emphasizing digital citizenship,and increasing the share of autonomous learning activities in the paradigm of mobility, interactivity and edutainment.

Keywords: information culture and education, multimodal media and information literacy, teacher’s mission, transdisciplinarity

[1] Frumin, I. D., et al. (2018). Universal’nye kompetentnosti I novaya gramotnost’: chemu uchit’ segodnya dlya uspeha zavtra. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya, vol. 2, issue 19, p.28.

[2] Buckingham, D. (1993). Towards New Literacies, Information Technology, English and Media Education. The English and Media Magazine, summer issue, p. 20-25.

[3] Passov, E. I. and Kuzovleva, N. E. (2010). Urok inostrannogo yazyka. Rostov: Glossa-Press, p. 640.

[4] Korneenko. T. N. (2016). Pedagogicheskoe vzaimodejstvie so studentom v usloviyah novoj obrazovatelnoj paradigm. Izvestiya Volgogr. gos. ped. un-ta, Ser.: Pedagogicheskie nauki, vol. 7, issue 111, p. 12.

[5] Malinetskii, G. G. (2010). Kognitivnyj vyzov i informacionnye tehnologii. Preprinty IPM im. M.V.Keldysha, issue 46, p. 28. Retrieved from https://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2010-46.

[6] Romm, T. A. (2010). Socialnost sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Idei i idealy, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 80 – 87.

[7] Sheler, M. (1994). Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Izdatelstvo «Gnosis». P. 21. (in Russian).

[8] Gendina, N. I. (2012). Formirovanie informacionnoj i mediagramotnosti v usloviyah informacionnogo obshestva: novaya iniciativa YuNESKO i problemy rossijskogo informacionnogo obrazovaniya. Pedagogika. Psihologiya, issue 1, p. 144.

[9] E-learning market-trends and forecast. (2016). A report by Docebo. Retrieved from https://www. academia.edu/31610714/E Learning_Market_Trends_and_Forecast_2014_-2016_Report

[10] Golitsyna, I. N. (2014). Tehnologiya Obrazovanie 3.0 v sovremennom uchebnom processe. Obrazovatelnye tehnologii i obshestvo, vol. 14, p. 652. Retrieved from http://ifets.ieee.org/russian/ depository/v17_i3/pdf/18.pdf.

[11] Keats, D. and Schmidt, J. (2007). The Genesis and Emergence of Education 3.0 in Higher Education and its Potential for Africa. First Monday, vol. 12, issue 3, p. 3. doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i3.1625.