Published date:Jan 12 2020

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries

Pages:286–300

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i1.5995

Stefania Cristina Curealucian.belascu@ulbsibiu.roBucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piata Romana, Bucharest, Romania

Lucian BelascuLucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 17 Calea Dumbravii, Sibiu, Romania

Ana-Maria BarsanUniversity of Bucharest, 59 Calea Plevnei, Bucharest, Romania

Our research investigates the performance of companies from Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries in the period after the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2009 with the aim of identifying the driving factors behind accounting- and market-based performance. We include in the analysis companies from various industries in CEE countries that are European Union members and we study their performance between 2008-2016 over the following areas of performance:  liquidity,  solvency and indebtedness, operational profitability, global performance (through Return on assets and Return on equity), returns available to shareholders and market-based performance (through price/book value and Tobin Q ratio). Employing the hierarchical and non-hierarchical k-means cluster analysis companies are segmented into various homogeneous groups using various financial performance indicators as variables, Euclidian distances and the Ward amalgamation method. Furthermore, the resulting clusters have been grouped according to the country of origin and industry. Our findings show that specific groups of companies in these countries share common attributes, as evidenced by their performance indicators, which do not seem to be entirely based on their countries of origin and industry. Moreover, our exploration of CEE companies’ performance dynamics after 2008 evidences the increased competition in all industries particularly after 2009, as well as businesses’ need to adjust their activities after the losses incurred during the crisis period, but these phenomena is present with different intensities depending on country of origin and industry. At the same, we note the enhancement of global performance through improvements in the operational performance instead of financial leverage and indebtedness, which is a sound business approach by CEE companies.

Keywords: financial performance, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), statistical cluster analysis, return to investors

[1] Sueyoshi, T. (2005). Financial Ratio Analysis of the Electric Power Industry. Asia- Pacific Journal of Operational Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 349-376.

[2] Horobet, A., Joldes, C. and Dumitrescu, D.G. (2008). A Cluster Analysis of Financial Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Ştiinţe economice, Tom XVII, vol. III – “Finances, Banks and Accountancy“, pp. 301-306.

[3] Dikova, D. (2009). Performance of foreign subsidiaries: Does psychic distance matter? International Business Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp.38-49.

[4] Santi, S. (2012). Using cluster analysis study to examine the successful performance entrepreneur in Indonesia. Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 4, pp. 286-298.

[5] Szabo, Z.K. and Herman, E. (2014). Productive entrepreneurship in the EU and its barriers in transition economies: A cluster analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 73-94.

[6] Hanousek, J. and Kochanova, A. (2016). Bribery environments and firm performance: Evidence from CEE countries. European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 43, issue C, pp. 14-28.

[7] Ta, V. and Liu, C.M. (2016). Stock market analysis using clustering techniques: the impact of foreign ownership on stock volatility in Vietnam. Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, pp. 99-106.

[8] Hartigan, J. A. and Wong, M. A. (1979). A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 100-108

[9] Witten, D. (2011). Classification and clustering of sequencing data using a Poisson model. The Annals of Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2493-2518.