KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Nov 03 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 8th Legal International Conference and Studies (LICS 2025): Justice, Human Rights, and Law—Protecting Vulnerable Communities

Pages: 316 - 323

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i28.20126

D. Djunaedid.djunlawyer@unissula.ac.idFaculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang

The right to immunity is a form of legal protection for advocates that guarantees that advocates as legal defenders cannot be prosecuted criminally, civilly, and administratively in carrying out their duties. However, several recent cases have highlighted the application of advocate immunity rights that show inconsistencies with the regulations. The research method used in this paper is normative juridical and data were collected through literature studies. The results of the study indicate that there is state recognition of the right to immunity for advocates through regulations in several laws and regulations. An example is the determination of a suspect by the Yogyakarta Regional Police against Meila, an advocate who was defending the rights of her client who was a victim of sexual violence, and questions regarding the limitations of the use of immunity rights in the case of Fredrich, former attorney for Setya Novanto who was involved in the e-KTP corruption case and was considered to have attempted to obstruct the investigation. These cases reflect the confusion of the concept of the application of immunity rights in Indonesia. This study aims to discuss the provisions of Indonesian law regarding the right to immunity for advocates and the role of immunity rights in supporting advocates in carrying out their professional responsibilities as law enforcers. In addition, this study examines the important role of immunity rights in supporting the legal process to run in an orderly manner in accordance

Keywords: advocate, immunity, legal, protection

[1] Hidayat, R. & Sari, A. Peran Advokat dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan; 2023.

[2] Nugroho, D. Hak Imunitas Advokat: Peran dan Batasannya dalam Praktik Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; 2021.

[3] Kurniawan, B. Kebebasan Advokat dalam Membela Klien di Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat; 2020.

[4] Rahardjo, S. Peran Advokat dalam Menegakkan Prinsip Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia; 2019.

[5] Wijaya T. Kode Etik Advokat dalam Penerapan Hak Imunitas di Indonesia. Jurnal Profesi Hukum; 2020.

[6] Wulandari T. Kebebasan Advokat dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; 2023.

[7] Haryono, A. Perlindungan Hak Imunitas Advokat dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia; 2019.

[8] Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia disahkah pada tanggal 23 May 2002

[9] Miangsari, Suryani Skripsi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Advokat Di Indonesia; 2018.

[10] Rahardjo S. Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban. Jakarta: Koran Kompas; 2006.

[11] Setiawan D. Hak Imunitas Advokat dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: Lembaga Studi Hukum; 2022.

[12] Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates.

[13] Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions

[14] Number L. 12 of. Concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence; 2022.

[15] Pers Rilis YLBHI-LBH Yogyakarta. “Upaya dan Desakan Bersama Berhasil, Polda Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta menghentikan Penyidikan Terhadap Meila, Advokat LBH Yogyakarta/YLBHI Pendamping Korban Kekerasan Seksual” https://ylbhi.or.id/informasi/upaya-dan-desakan-bersama-berhasil-polda-daerahistimewa- yogyakarta-menghentikan-penyidikan-terhadap-meila-advokat-lbhyogyakarta- ylbhi-pendamping-korban-kekerasan-seksual/ Accessed on 10 October 2024 at 12.16 WIB.

[16] Aulia, M. Z. Hukum Pembangunan dari Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja: Mengarahkan Pembangunan atau Mengabdi pada Pembangunan? Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2); 2019. 363–392. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.363-392

[17] Bernstein, A. Minding the gaps in lawyers’ rules of professional conduct. Oklahoma Law Review, 72(1); 2019. 125–148.

[18] Calvin, J., & Pratiwi, M. G. Dalam Melakukan Pekerjaan. 2(2); 2018. 691–699

[19] Disemadi, H. S. Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2); 2022. 289. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280

[20] Efendi, Aan; Susanti, D. O. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Quo Vadis Perlindungan Konsumen Pangan Rekayasa Genetika. RajaGrafindo Persada; 2022.