KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Oct 13 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference of Psychology 2025 (IcoPsy 2025)

Pages: 462 - 477

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i25.19922

Yudi Tri Harsonoyudi.tri.fppsi@um.ac.idUniversitas Negeri Malang, Faculty of Psychology

Asaa Mawaddatan NuzulaUniversitas Negeri Malang, Faculty of Psychology

Maharani GynantiUniversitas Negeri Malang, Faculty of Psychology

Femmi NurmalitasariUniversitas Negeri Malang, Faculty of Psychology

Dagna KocurUniversity of Silesia, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Katowice

This study aims to adapt the scale of spousal social support constructed by Dorio for use by married early adult women. This study involved 150 women aged 18-25 years as respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to determine evidence of validity based on its internal structure using the Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistic Program (JASP) 0.19.0.30 application. The reliability of the spousal social support scale using construct reliability (CR) as part of the CFA analysis. The results showed a fit model with CFI=0.920; TLI=0.911; PNFI=0.735; IFI=0.921; RMSEA=0.666; SRMR=0.053 consisting of 20 items. This adapted spousal support scale can be used as a valid measuring instrument based on its internal structure and is reliable for future research on married early adult women. However, further improvements and adjustments still need to be made to make it a more reliable instrument.

Keywords: spousal social support, married woman, early adulthood

[1] Santrock JW. Life-Span Development. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2006.

[2] Hurlock EB. Developmental Psychology: A Lifespan Approach. 5th ed. McGraw- Hill; 1980.

[3] Okin SM. (2015). Justice, Gender, and The Family. In D. Engster & T. Metz (Eds.), Justice, Politics, and The Family (pp. 63–87). Routledge.

[4] Badan Pusat Statistik. Jumlah Penduduk Berumur 10 Tahun ke Atas menurut Kelompok Umur, Jenis Kelamin, dan Status Perkawinan, INDONESIA, Tahun 2022. 2023. Available from: https://sensus.bps.go.id/topik/tabular/sp2022/193/1/0

[5] Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Indonesia 2024. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id

[6] Santrock JW. Life-Span Development Perkembangan Masa-Hidup, jilid 1, Terj. Benedictine Wisdyasinta, Jakarta, Erlangga. 2011.

[7] Taormina RJ, Gao JH. Maslow and the motivation hierarchy: measuring satisfaction of the needs. Am J Psychol. 2013;126(2):155–77.

[8] Muhardeni R. Peran Intensitas Komunikasi, Kepercayaan, dan Dukungan Sosial Terhadap Kebahagiaan Perkawinan pada Istri Tentara Saat Menjalani Long Distance Marriage (LDM) di Batalyon Infanteri 407/Padmakusuma Kabupaten Tegal. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial. 2018;16(1):34–44.

[9] Chen Y, Feeley TH. Social Support, Social Strain, Loneliness, and Well-Being Among Older Adults: An analysis of the Health and Retirement Study. J Soc Pers Relat. 2014;31(2):141–61.

[10] Sarafino EP. Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Interactions. 6th ed. United States: JohnWilley & Sons, Inc.; 2008.

[11] Tentama F. Dukungan Sosial dan Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder pada Remaja Penyintas Gunung Merapi. Jurnal Psikologi Undip. 2014;13(2):133–8.

[12] Rif’ati MI, Arumsari A, Fajriani N, Maghfiroh VS, Abidi AF, Chusairi A, et al. Konsep Dukungan Sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Airlangga; 2018.

[13] House JS. Work Stress and Social Support. Addison-Wesley; 1981.

[14] Thoits PA. Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;35(Spec No):53–79.

[15] Santoso MDY. Dukungan Sosial dalam Situasi Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati: Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan.2021;5(1):11-26.

[16] Dorio JM. The Provision of Spousal Support: Antecedents, Consequences, and Crossover Effects. University of South Florida; 2009.

[17] Nugraha W, Malueka N. Peran Intensitas Komunikasi dan Dukungan Sosial Pasangan Terhadap Kepuasaan Perkawinan Suami/Istri Ditinjau Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. Jurnal Consulenza : Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling dan Psikologi. 2023;6(1):97– 108.

[18] Setyowati E, Pradhanawati A. Konflik Peran, Dukungan Sosial Pasangan, dan Prestasi Kerja di PT. Sariwarna Asli Textile Boyolali. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis. 2018;8(1):80–7.

[19] Sasongko B, Mariyant S, Safitri S. Hubungan Dukungan Sosial dengan Resiliensi pada Perempuan yang Mengalami Infertilitas. JCA of Psychology. 2020;1(02).

[20] Santini ZI, Koyanagi A, Tyrovolas S, Mason C, Haro JM. The association between social relationships and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr;175:53–65.

[21] Cutrona CE, Suhr JA. Social Support in Marriage: The Role of Emotional and Instrumental Support. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;65(3):516–29.

[22] Bradbury TN, Fincham FD, Beach SR. Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62(4):964–80.

[23] Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):472–503.

[24] Widodo S, Ladyani F. Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian. CV Science Techno Direct. 2023

[25] Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1994.

[26] Trisnawati I. (2021). Pengaruh Dukungan Pasangan dan Dukungan Rekan Kerja Terhadap Work-to-family Enrichment pada Wanita Dual Karir (Doctoral Dissertation). Universitas Islam Riau.

[27] Nugraha MB. Hubungan Antara Dukungan Pasangan dan Work Engagement pada Karyawan PT. Pusri Palembang. Universitas Islam Indonesia; 2018.

[28] Umar J, Nisa YF. (2020). Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 2020, 1-11. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/62656

[29] Matondang Z. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal tabularasa. 2009;6(1):87-97.

[30] Kim HS, Sherman DK, Taylor SE. Culture and social support. Am Psychol. 2008 Sep;63(6):518–26.

[31] Sukmawati R, Rahmawati H, Yuliyanti I. Adaptasi dan Validasi Alat Ukur Psikologi dalam Konteks Budaya Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat. 2021;8(2):223–37.

[32] Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1–4.

[33] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2017.

[34] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Cengage Learning; 2019.

[35] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000 Dec;25(24):3186–91.

[36] Hambleton RK, Merenda PF, Spielberger CD. Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.

[37] Aiken LR. Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educ Psychol Meas. 1985;45(1):131–42.

[38] Azwar S. Reliabilitas dan validitas, edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2019.

[39] Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: new developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412–27.

[40] Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.

[41] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. JMR. 1981;18(1):39–50.