KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Oct 13 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference of Psychology 2025 (IcoPsy 2025)

Pages: 216 - 232

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i25.19896

Amalia Maslakha Aimmaamalia.maslakha.2008116@students.um.ac.idDepartment of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

Retno SulistiyaningsihDepartment of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

Puberty is a transition phase from childhood to adolescence that causes various changes in individuals, including those with special needs. These changes cause discomfort for special education teachers when assisting students with special needs of different genders during puberty. It causes special education teachers to be unable to provide maximum assistance. This study aimed to explore the prosocial behavior of special education teachers who assist students with special needs of different genders during puberty and to determine the factors that influence this behavior. This qualitative study used a case study model with observation and semi-structured interview data collection methods. Four subjects in this study were selected through purposive sampling techniques. Data were analyzed using six-step thematic analysis techniques, and validity was tested through data triangulation and interpretative methods. The study found that the prosocial behavior of special education teachers in assisting students with special needs is demonstrated in four aspects. The sharing aspect carried out by teachers is reflected in classroom learning activities. The four participants showed the aspects of caring and empathy in different ways according to the characteristics and challenges of the children. Meanwhile, helping behavior focuses on nonacademic assistance, such as assisting with toilet training and preventing inappropriate sexual behavior, such as masturbation at school and touching the chest and genital area of the opposite sex. Factors influencing this prosocial behavior include special interests, gender relations, competence of children with special needs, age, physical fitness, and social meaning.

Keywords: prosocial behavior, special education teachers, special needs children in puberty age

[1] Zakia DL. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Guru Pembimbing Khusus (GPK): Pilar Pendidikan Inklusi. Sukses Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Pendidikan Jurnal Bereputasi. Meretas Sukses Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Pendidikan Jurnal Bereputasi; 2015. pp. 110–6.

[2] Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Luar Biasa. Pedoman umum penyelenggaraan pendidikan insklusif. Departement Pendidikan Nasional; 2011. pp. 1–36.

[3] Rusmono DO. Optimalisasi Pendidikan Inklusi di Sekolah: Literature Review. Volume 7. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan; 2020. pp. 209–17.

[4] Wardah EY. Peranan Guru Pembimbing Khusus Lulusan Non-Pendidikan Luar Biasa (Plb) Terhadap Pelayanan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Sekolah Inklusi Kabupaten Lumajang. Vol. 2, JPI ( Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi). 2019. p. 93.

[5] Yusri N ’Aisyiah, Fauziah U. Penyimpangan Perilaku Seksual pada Remaja Tunagrahita [Internet]. Vol. 8, Jurnal Psikologi Islam Al-Qalb. 2017. p. 29–36. Available from: https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/alqalb/article/view/869

[6] Sari SG, Mudjiran M. Pentingnya Pemahaman Perbedaan Individual (Individual Differences) Bagi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Volume 8. Jurnal Cerdas Proklamator; 2020. pp. 54–63.

[7] Niman S, Budi Arianto A, Shinta Parulian T, Saputra AH. Masturbasi Dan Guilty Feeling Pada Remaja. Volume 10. Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan IMELDA; 2024. pp. 35–41.

[8] Karaben GA, Kustanti ER. Prososial Guru Di Slb Negeri Semarang. Volume 9. Jurnal Empati; 2020. pp. 294–9.

[9] Hanifah FD, Hamdan SR. Kontribusi Religiusitas terhadap Perilaku Prososial Guru Sekolah Inklusi.pdf. 2021.

[10] Farhaya TP, Wahyudi H. Studi deskriptif mengenai perilaku prososial pada guru di sekolah dasar negeri putraco indah bandung. Prosiding Psikologi; 2015. p. 58.

[11] Dayakisni T, Hudaniah. Psikologi sosial. 2009;

[12] Hanum Maloka Tiarani. Hubungan Empati dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Mahasiswa di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Volume 5. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2020. pp. 43–54.

[13] Caprara GV, Steca P, Zelli A, Capanna C. A New Scale for Measuring Adults’ Prosocialness. 2005.

[14] House BR. How do social norms influence prosocial development? Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Apr;20:87–91.

[15] Hruschka DJ, Henrich J. Prosocial Behaviour, Cultural Differences in. In: Second E, editor. Wright JDBT-IE of the S& BS. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. pp. 238–43., Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868241032

[16] Hanurawan fattah. Metode penelitian kualitatif untuk ilmu psikologi. pt rajagrafindo persada. 2016;

[17] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology_braun clarke 2006 copy. Vol. 3. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

[18] Prameswara GA. PERILAKU PROSOSIAL MAHASISWA PSIKOLOGI PADA MASA PANDEMI. 2020; Available from: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/56990

[19] Aldrup K, Carstensen B, Klusmann U. Is Empathy the Key to Effective Teaching? A Systematic Review of Its Association with Teacher-Student Interactions and Student Outcomes. Vol. 34. Educ Psychol Rev. 2022;34(3):1177–216.

[20] Baron R., Byrne D. Psikologi sosial. 2005;(. Edisi kesepuluh: jilid 2. Jakarta: erlangga.).

[21] Asih GY, Pratiwi MM. Perilaku Prososial Ditinjau Dari Empati Dan Kematangan Emosi [Internet]Volume I. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Muria Kudus; 2010. pp. 33–42., Available from http://eprints.umk.ac.id/268/1/33_-_42.PDF

[22] Faz GO, Hafid I. Guru Pembimbing Khusus (GPK) di Sekolah Inklusi Palangka Raya. Vol. 8, Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. 2023. p. 47–54.

[23] Kamiya M, Osawa A, Shinoda Y, Nishii H, Kondo I. The current state of family caregiver burden and support of toilet problems for elderly with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Urol. 2023 Jun;30(6):539–46.

[24] Wulandari RS, Hendriani W. kompetensi pedagogik gpk The current state of family caregiver burden and support of toilet problems for elderly with mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer’s disease. Int J Urol. 2020;30(6):539–46.

[25] Wijaya S, Supena A, Yufiarti. Yufiarti. Implementasi Program Pendidikan Inklusi Pada Sekolah Dasar di Kota Serang. J Educ FKIP UNMA. 2023;9(1):347–57.

[26] Santrock JW. Life-span development Sixteenth Edition. Life-span development, 7th ed. 2017. p. 1–626.

[27] Ulfah M, Karolina V. Ketimpangan Gender Guru di Taman Kanak-Kanak dan Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia. Vol. 7, Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 2023. p. 3407–17. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4530.

[28] Pancaningrum N. Pasiningsih. Persepsi Calon Guru dan Guru Laki-Laki sebagai Minoritas Gender di Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 2023. p. 1320–32.