KnE Social Sciences

Published date: Sep 16 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The Mercu Buana Ecobiz Energy International Conference: Sustainability and ESG Reporting in the Energy Sector

Pages: 127 - 137

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i21.19698

Sri Marti Pramudenadena_pramu@mercubuana.ac.idFaculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

The main goal of companies is to obtain the greatest possible profit. However, to achieve this goal, companies often ignore the social and environmental impacts that arise from economic activities or actions carried out by the company. Capital owners who are only oriented towards profit or material (single line), have damaged the balance of life by over-emphasizing human potential. Corporate responsibility no longer refers to the single bottom line, namely the company’s value reflected in financial conditions alone, but rather the company’s responsibility must implement triple bottom lines which include financial, social, and environmental aspects. This is because financial conditions alone are not enough to guarantee that the company’s value grows sustainably. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not there is an influence of ESG on the sustainability of corporate profits through the implementation of CSR. This study uses a quantitative method to test the established hypothesis by collecting data using research instruments, analyzing data in the form of numbers through statistical processing of certain populations and samples. The population used in this study were 193 manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. The sample determined is a company whose criteria provide CSR Reports during 2020-2022 as many as seven companies. The results state that there is an influence of profitability on ESG, an influence of CSR on ESG, and GCG does not strengthen the influence of profitability on ESG, and GCG is able to strengthen the relationship between CSR and ESG.

Keywords: profitability, CSR, ESG, GCG

[1] Kurniawan CC, Irawan JF. The Effect of Liquidity Ratio, Cost Ratio, Capital Adequacy, and Credit Risk as Moderation on Bank Profitability. E-Journal of Accounting. 2021;31(12):3178–94.

[2] Qodary HF, Tambun S. Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) dan retention ratio terhadap return saham dengan nilai perusahaan sebagai variabel moderating. Juremi. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi. 2021;1(2):159–72.

[3] Aldama RA, Herwiyanti E, Srirejeki K. Peran Mediasi Reputasi Pada Hubungan Pengungkapan Csr Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Di Asean Dari Perspektif Green Banking. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi. 2021;23(1):49–64.

[4] Erdianty RW, Bintoro I. Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Corporate Social Responsibility dan Good Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi (Studi Pada Perusahan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2014). Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis. 2015;6(2):376–96.

[5] Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Teori perusahaan: perilaku manajerial, biaya agensi dan struktur kepemilikan. Jurnal ekonomi keuangan. 1976;3(4):305-360.

[6] Akmalia A, Dio K, Hesty N. Pengaruh kinerja keuangan terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan corporate social responsibility dan good corporate governance sebagai variabel pemoderasi (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur di bursa efek indonesia periode 2010-2015). Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis. 2017;8(2):200–21.

[7] Rizki RDN, Saad B. Dampak Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2016-2018). Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan. 2021;18(1):45-56.