KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Optimizing Rural Funds for Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Rural Areas

Published date: Sep 16 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The Mercu Buana Ecobiz Energy International Conference: Sustainability and ESG Reporting in the Energy Sector

Pages: 37 - 50

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i21.19688

Authors:

Rien Agustin Fadjarenieagustin.fadjarenie@mercubuana.ac.idDepartment of Accounting, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

Deden TarmidiDepartment of Accounting, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

Sely Megawati WahyudiDepartment of Accounting, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

Zuha Rosufila Bt Abu HasanFaculty of Business, Economic and Social Development, University Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu

Nila KencanaDepartment of Accounting, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

Abstract:

Rural communities in Indonesia face significant challenges in managing rural funds effectively, particularly in solid waste management. Rural-owned enterprises (BUMDes) Panggung Lestari in Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, play a vital role in local development but often struggle to optimize fund utilization for sustainable waste management. This research examines optimal rural fund management practices for solid waste management, focusing on cost-quality studies and innovative waste collection strategies to reduce costs. We use a qualitative case study approach, collecting data through semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observations. The findings highlight specific cost reduction strategies, such as the mechanization of waste collection processes, which reduced operational costs by twelve percent, and the implementation of community engagement initiatives, which enhanced waste collection efficiency. Additionally, financial management training and collaboration with local governments for strategic fund allocation further optimized resource usage. The novelty of this study lies in integrating solid waste management insights with rural fund utilization through a cost-of-quality perspective, improving financial decision-making and operational efficiency, and promoting sustainable waste management in rural communities.

Keywords: rural funds, sustainable solid waste management, cost reduction, cost of quality, rural-owned enterprises

References:

[1] Olmedo L, O’Shaughnessy M. Community-based social enterprises as actors for neo-endogenous rural development: a multi-stakeholder approach☆. Rural Sociol. 2022 Dec;87(4):1191–218.

[2] Aritenang A. The role of social capital on rural enterprises economic performance: a case study in indonesia villages. SAGE Open. 2021 Sep;11(3):21582440211044178.

[3] Apostolopoulos N, Liargovas P, Stavroyiannis S, Makris I, Apostolopoulos S, Petropoulos D, et al. Sustaining rural areas, rural tourism enterprises and EU development policies: A multi-layer conceptualisation of the obstacles in Greece. Sustainability (Basel). 2020 Sep;12(18):7687.

[4] Khartishvili L, Muhar A, Dax T, Khelashvili I. Rural tourism in Georgia in transition: challenges for regional sustainability. Sustainability (Basel). 2019 Jan;11(2):410.

[5] Dax T, Fischer M. Challenges for rural development in Europe: reassessing the contribution of rural enterprises to regional growth. Eur Plann Stud. 2018;26(2):241– 62.

[6] Kaza S, Yao L, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F. What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications; 2018 Dec 12.

[7] Díaz R, Medina-Mijangos R, Santos A. Technological innovations for solid waste management in low-income countries: A review. Waste Manag. 2020;102:487–95.

[8] Mihai FC, Grozavu A. Role of waste collection efficiency in providing a cleaner rural environment. Sustainability (Basel). 2019 Dec;11(23):6855.

[9] Rachman I, Soesanto QM, Khair H, Matsumoto T. Participation of leaders and community in solid waste management in indonesia to reduce landfill waste load. Journal of Community Based Environmental Engineering and Management. 2020 Nov;4(2):75–84.

[10] Rammohan A, Tohari A. Rural poverty and labour force participation: evidence from Indonesia’s Village fund program. PLoS One. 2023 Jun;18(6):e0283041.

[11] Rao PS, Refeq A. Application of cost of quality in the waste management industry: A conceptual review. Int J Environ Stud. 2021;78(3):409–21.

[12] Viljoen JM, Schenck CJ, Volschenk L, Blaauw PF, Grobler L. Household waste management practices and challenges in a rural remote town in the Hantam Municipality in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Sustainability (Basel). 2021 May;13(11):5903.

[13] Borchard R, Zeiss R, Recker J. Digitalization of waste management: insights from German private and public waste management firms. Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jun;40(6):775–92.

[14] Sarc R, Curtis A, Kandlbauer L, Khodier K, Lorber KE, Pomberger R. Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management - A review. Waste Manag. 2019 Jul;95:476–92.

[15] Kurniawan TA, Liang X, O’Callaghan E, Goh H, Othman MH, Avtar R, et al. Transformation of solid waste management in China: moving towards sustainability through digitalization-based circular economy. Sustainability (Basel). 2022 Feb;14(4):2374.

[16] Abdallah M, Abu Talib M, Feroz S, Nasir Q, Abdalla H, Mahfood B. Artificial intelligence applications in solid waste management: A systematic research review. Waste Manag. 2020 May;109:231–46.

[17] Wakabayashi Y, Peii T, Tabata T, Saeki T. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costs for pre-disaster waste management systems. Waste Manag. 2017 Oct;68:688–700.

[18] Hou C, Sarigöllü E. Waste prevention by consumers’ product redistribution: perceived value, waste minimization attitude and redistribution behavior. Waste Manag. 2021 Aug;132:12–22.

[19] Llatas C, Bizcocho N, Soust-Verdaguer B, Montes MV, Qui nones R. An LCA-based model for assessing prevention versus non-prevention of construction waste in buildings. Waste Manag. 2021 May;126:608–22.

[20] Corsini F, Gusmerotti NM, Testa F, Iraldo F. Exploring waste prevention behaviour through empirical research. Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:132–41.

[21] Johansson N, Corvellec H. Waste policies gone soft: an analysis of European and Swedish waste prevention plans. Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:322–32.

[22] Ribeiro-Rodrigues E, Bortoleto AP, Costa Fracalanza B. Exploring the influence of contextual and sociodemographic factors on waste prevention behaviour - the case of Campinas, Brazil. Waste Manag. 2021 Nov;135:208–19.