KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Model for Participatory Planning Digital Transformation of Local Economic Development

Published date:Feb 19 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Economic and Sustainable Development (ICESIDE)

Pages:184 - 195

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i5.18113

Authors:

Kurniyati Indahsarikurniyati.indahsari@trunojoyo.ac.idDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Yufita ListianaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Abstract:

Planning process digitization is widely used in Indonesia’s national and regional development. However, the local economic development, characterized by participation and empowerment, has not matched the implementations. This study argues that the participatory planning process for local economic development should be standardized and digitized. The argument is based on the results of the literature regarding development stages, procedures, the characteristics and cycles of information system designs, and various digitizing participatory planning practices in various countries. In-depth interviews were conducted with local economic development planners/facilitators and other parties involved in planning, such as information system analysts and designers. The results showed that the stages and instruments in the participatory local economic planning process could be standardized and digitized. However, digital systems cannot replace all stages due to the varied contexts of action plans’ problems.

Keywords: local economic development, participatory planning, digitization of the planning process

References:

[1] Loonam J, Eaves S, Kumar V, Parry G. Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned from traditional organizations. Strateg Chang. 2018;27(2).

[2] Khashman IM, Khashman AM. The Impact of Human Resource Information System (HRIS) Applications on Organizational Performance (Efficiency and Effectiveness) in Jordanian Private Hospitals. J Manag Res. 2016;8(3):31.

[3] Purwanto R. PENERAPAN SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK (SIA) SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN EFEKTIFITAS DAN EFISIENSI PENGELOLAAN AKADEMIK SEKOLAH. JTT ( Jurnal Teknol Ter. 2017;3(2).

[4] Jiang N, Zhao X, Zhang J. An empirical study on the impact of information system absorption on the performance of troops’ logistics organization. Cluster Comput. 2019;22 S2:22.

[5] Ahmad MA, Al-Shbiel SO. The Effect of Accounting Information System on Organiza- tional Performance in Jordanian Industrial SMEs: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2019;10(3). https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v10n3p9.

[6] Ghafoor Awan A, Multan Fahad-Ul-Haq Khan P. Impact of Management Information System on the Performance of the Organization (Profitability, Innovation, and Growth). An Int Peer-reviewed J. 2016;21.

[7] Sudianing NK dan KAS. Peran sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah dalam Menunjang Peningkatan Kualitas Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah. Locus Maj Ilm FISIP. 2019;Vol 11(No. 2).

[8] Jamal AL. KAJIAN TENTANG FUNGSI SISTEM INFORMASI PERENCANAAN PEM- BANGUNAN DAERAH (SIPPD) DALAM PROSES PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DI KABUPATEN POSO. Katalogis. 2016;4(1).

[9] Husaini Y. SISTEM INFORMASI PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH BERBA- SIS WEB. J Sos Hum Sigli. 2019;2(2):65–8.

[10] Indahsari K. URGENSI PERENCANAAN PARTISIPATIF DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DESA (STUDI KASUS PEMBERDAYAAN KELOMPOK PEREMPUAN DESA PENDABAH). Media Trend. 2020;15(1).

[11] Sonbait LY, Wambrauw YL. Permasalahan dan Solusi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Program Biogas Sebagai Energi Alternatif di Kabupaten Manokwari Papua Barat (Problems and Solutions Program for Community Empowerment through Biogas as an Alternative Energy at Manokwari Regency West Papua). Vol. 11. 2011.

[12] Toun RN, Candra ES. Model Perumusan Kebijakan Elit Transformasional Pada Perencanaan Pembangunan Masyarakat (Studi Perencanaan Pembangunan Di Desa Tumbang Liting). J Ilmu Adm Negara. 2016;3(2).

[13] Muslim A. PENDEKATAN PARTISIPATIF DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN MASY ARARAT. 2017.

[14] Gedikli B. The role of leadership in the success of participatory planning processes: experience from Turkey. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2009;16(2):115–30.

[15] Hämäläinen RP, Miliszewska I, Voinov A. Leadership in participatory modelling – Is there a need for it? Environ Model Softw. 2020;:133.

[16] Andriany D. Pengembangan Model Pendekatan Partisipatif Dalam Memberdayakan Masyarakat Miskin Kota Medan Untuk Memperbaiki Taraf Hidup [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://fe.unp.ac.id/

[17] Astuti W, Hardiana A. Perencanaan Partisipatif pada Tingkat Kelurahan Sebagai Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan pada Permukiman Kumuh Perkotaan. J Reg City Plan. 2009;20(2):146–54.

[18] Afzalan N, Muller B. Online Participatory Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges for Enriching Participatory Planning. J Am Plann Assoc. 2018;84(2):162– 77.

[19] Geertman S. Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environ Plan B Plan Des. 2002;29(1):21–35.

[20] Kangas J, Store R. Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management. Landsc Urban Plan. 2003;62(2):89–101.

[21] Hanzl M. Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials. Des Stud. 2007;28( 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003.

[22] Livengood A, Kunte K. Enabling participatory planning with GIS: A case study of settlement mapping in Cuttack, India. Environ Urban. 2012;24(1):77–97.

[23] Yates KL, Schoeman DS. Spatial access priority mapping (SAPM) with fishers: a quantitative GIS method for participatory planning. PLoS One. 2013 Jul;8(7):e68424.

[24] Zhang L, Geertman S, Hooimeijer P, Lin Y. The usefulness of a Web-based Participatory Planning Support System in Wuhan, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2019;74:74.

[25] Fuldauer LI, Ives MC, Adshead D, Thacker S, Hall JW. Participatory planning of the future of waste management in small island developing states to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals. J Clean Prod. 2019;223:223.

[26] Chipeniuk R. Some tools for planning for amenity migration in remote rural settlements: lessons from participatory action. Community Dev J. 2008;43(2):222– 38.

[27] Pereverza K, Pasichnyi O, Kordas O. Modular participatory backcasting: A unifying framework for strategic planning in the heating sector. Energy Policy. 2019;124:124.

[28] Tippett J. Participatory planning in river catchments, an innovative toolkit tested in Southern Africa and North West England. Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(9):95–105.

[29] Evers J, Douven W, Van der Stroom J, Hasan S, Seijger C, Phi HL. A framework to assess the performance of participatory planning tools for strategic delta planning. J Environ Plann Manage. 2019;62(9):1636–53.

[30] Dennis A, Wixom BH, Roth RM. System Analysis and Design. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012.

[31] Hewitt RJ, Macleod CJA. What do users really need? Participatory development of decision support tools for environmental management based on outcomes. Environ - MDPI. 2017;4(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4040088.

[32] Betit BE. Participatory action planning: Integrating aspects of action research, organization development, and strategic planning (Order No. 3143957) [Internet]. 2004. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/participatory-action-planning-integrating-aspects/docview/305050101/se-2?accountid=49910

[33] Indahsari K. MENYUSUN RENCANA STRATEGIS PENYELENGGARAAN URUSAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH. 1st ed. feb UTM; 2018. 54 p.

[34] Light A, Akama Y. The human touch: Participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347645.

Recommendations
DESIGNING AN EDUCATIONAL AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AT UNIVERSITY 4.0 AS A MODEL OF A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY: STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS
L. Turarbekova, KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020
THE EFFECT OF THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL MEASUREMENT, THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE AND THE FIRM’S CAPITAL STRUCTURE ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Y. Sagara et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018
ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION GROWS SANTRI’S ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT (EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA’S ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL)
M. Hidayatulloh et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019
STUDY OF COPPER RECOVERY USING EMULSION LIQUID MEMBRANE UNDER TAYLOR-COUETTE COLUMN
A. Kusumastuti et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019
REGIONALISM AND CO-DESIGN APPROACH IN THE REDESIGN OF A LITERACY STAGE AT THE NGINDEN JANGKUNGAN HERBAL LIBRARY IN SURABAYA
Nathania Melissa Yuliani et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2022
SHIP ACCIDENT ANALYSIS IN TOBA LAKE
Aulia Ika Atika, KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2021
NON-OBSERVANCE OF MAXIMS IN INDONESIA CHICK LITERATURE WITH THE SPECIAL REFERENCE TO IKA NATASSA’S ARCHITECTURE OF LOVE
M. K. Wardana et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018
UNDERSTANDING HADITH ON NATURE CONSERVATION: AN EFFORT TO REINFORCE ECOLOGICAL PIETY
Salamah Noorhidayati et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2022
EFFECTS OF COMPANY SIZE, COMPANY AGE, AUDIT COMMITTEE, AND AUDITOR QUALITY ON SHARIA INFORMATION DISCLOSURE COMPLIANCE -AN INDONESIAN SHARIA ’FINANCIAL INDUSTRY EVIDENCE
Krismiaji et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019
KOTA TUA JAKARTA REVITALIZATION: AN EFFORT TO EMBODY HUMAN RIGHTS CITY IN RAILWAYS TRACK'S VICINITY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Ajitomo Wibowo et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2022
Powered by
Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

2 Abstract Views

8 PDF Downloads