Published date:Feb 19 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Economic and Sustainable Development (ICESIDE)

Pages:147 - 157

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i5.18110

Jakfar Sadikjakfar.sadik@trunojoyo.ac.idDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, Trunojoyo Madura University

Crisanty Sutristyaningyas TitikDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, Trunojoyo Madura University

Ni Made SukartiniDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, Airlangga University

Akhmad Ricky RevanandaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, Trunojoyo Madura University

The research objectives of this study are: 1) knowing the variety of stakeholders in marine fisheries cultivation, 2) knowing the role and profile of marine fisheries cultivation stakeholders, and 3) the level of importance and influence of stakeholders in marine fisheries cultivation. The method used in this research is stakeholder analysis. Stakeholder analysis is used to identify all parties that meet the definition of stakeholders including parties that may be influenced or affect the results of marine fisheries cultivation activities in Sapeken District. The results showed various stakeholders namely fishing communities (actors), government, entrepreneurs and academics with their level of interest and influence in aquaculture through floating cages. This research is expected to contribute to the development of the concept of coastal and small island economies.

Keywords: stakeholders, floating cage, archipelagic region

[1] Aftabuddin S, Hussain G, Mamun A, Failler P, Drakeford B. On the potential and constraints of mariculture development in Bangladesh. Aquacult Int. 2021;29(2):575– 93.

[2] Aivaz KA, Stan MI, Vintilă DF. Why Should Fisheries and Agriculture Be Considered Priority Domains for Maritime Spatial Planning in the Black Sea? A Stakeholder Perspective. Ovidius University Annals. Economic Sciences Series. 2021;21(2):12– 20.

[3] Bendtsen EB, Clausen LP, Hansen SF. A review of the state-of-the-art for stakeholder analysis with regard to environmental management and regulation. J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb;279:111773.

[4] Bjørkan M, Billing SL. Commercial seaweed cultivation in Scotland and the social pillar of sustainability: a Q-method approach to characterizing key stakeholder perspectives. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;6(1):795024.

[5] Galparsoro I, Murillas A, Pinarbasi K, Sequeira AM, Stelzenmüller V, Borja Á, et al. Global stakeholder vision for ecosystem-based marine aquaculture expansion from coastal to offshore areas. Rev Aquacult. 2020;12(4):2061–79.

[6] Malizia, Emil, Renski, and Drucker. Understanding local economic development. Taylor & Francis: 2021.

[7] Mitincu CG, Niţă MR, Hossu CA, Iojă IC, Nita A. Stakeholders’ involvement in the planning of nature-based solutions: A network analysis approach. Environ Sci Policy. 2023;141:69–79.

[8] Noor M, Fourqoniah F, Aransyah MF. Local government policy analysis in implementing strategic roles of marine and fisheries development in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Aquacult Aquarium Conserv Legis. 2022;15(1):502–9.

[9] Rahimi F, Yazdanpanah M, Gholamrezai S, Ahmadvand M. An analysis of the stakeholders of groundwater resources management in Iran. Environ Sci Policy. 2022;136:270–81.

[10] Salas LE, Vieira LR, Guilhermino L. Sustainable fishing and aquaculture activities in the Atlantic coast of the Portuguese North Region: multi-stakeholder views as a tool for maritime spatial planning. Sustainability (Basel). 2021;13(2):663–78.

[11] Syandri, Hafrijal, and Munzir, A. Floating cage aquaculture production in Indonesia: assessment of opportunities and challenges in Lake Maninjau. AIMS Environ Sci. 2022;9(1):223–35.

[12] Yu J, Liu J. Policies in the development of offshore cage aquaculture in China: evolution, performance, and prospects. Rev Fish Sci Aquacult. 2023;31(2):216–32.

[13] Yu J, Yin W. Exploring stakeholder engagement in mariculture development: challenges and prospects for China. Mar Policy. 2019;103(1):84–90.