Published date:Feb 18 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 2024 AAPA-EROPA-AGPA-IAPA Joint Conference

Pages:245 - 261

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i4.18039

Asti Amelia Novitaasti@ub.ac.idUniversitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

The decline in the Environmental Quality Index (IKLH) in Malang City highlights worsening environmental conditions, particularly in water quality, which saw a drastic reduction from 69.26 in 2020 to 29.26 in 2022. This significant drop reflects the ineffective management of natural resources, including water, land cover, and air quality. With Malang’s IKLH standing at 56.31 in 2022, the need for urgent improvement is clear. Addressing this requires concrete actions, starting with an analysis of environmental governance that engages key stakeholders such as the environmental agency, health agency, public works and spatial planning agency, and local environmental communities. A collaborative governance approach, grounded in the Green Economy Index (GEI), is proposed, integrating social, economic, and environmental dimensions. This study utilizes soft systems methodology and Penta helix analysis, incorporating perspectives from the government, community, academia, the private sector, and media. The aim is to develop an integrated governance model to enhance Malang’s environmental quality. The analysis underscores a lack of coordination between government agencies, environmental groups, and the public, which hampers effective environmental management. By implementing the GEI framework, the proposed model seeks to address these gaps and optimize Malang City’s environmental quality.

Keywords: environmental quality index, collaborative governance, pentahelix, green economy index

[1] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. Indeks kualitas lingkungan hidup. Jakarta; 2023.[[cited 2024 Jul 10]].

[2] Perwira IY. Tingkat dan laju penurunan kualitas air di DAS Brantas Malang Raya. Journal of Marine and Aquatic Sciences. 2019;5(2):185–91.

[3] Triwanda D, Sholichin M, Yuliani E. Studi analisa kualitas air hulu Sungai Brantas ruas Kota Malang menggunakan program QUAL2Kw. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya Air. 2023;3(2):550–63.

[4] Djoharam, V., Riani, E., & Yani, M. (2018). Analisis kualitas air dan daya tampung beban pencemaran Sungai Pesanggrahan di wilayah Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 8(1), 127-133.. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.8.1.127-133.

[5] Sofiana M, Kadarsah A, Sofarini D. Kualitas air terdampak limbah sebagai indikator pembangunan berkelanjutan di Sub DAS Martapura Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan. 2022;8(1):18–31.

[6] Sasongko EB, Widyastuti E, Priyono RE. Kajian kualitas air dan penggunaan sumur gali oleh masyarakat di sekitar Sungai Kaliyasa Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan. 2021;12(2):72–82.

[7] Ummiyati IR, Latifah S, Hidayati E. Kualitas air di berbagai klasifikasi tutupan lahan Taman Nasional Meru Betiri Desa Sanenrejo Kecamatan Tempurejo Kabupaten Jember Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Hutan Tropical. 2024;8(1):99–110.

[8] United Nations Statistics Division. (2023). The framework for the devel opment of environment statistics. New York. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envstats/fdes.cshtml

[9] Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide Soft Systems Methodology.

[10] Hardjosoekarto S. Construction of social development index as a theoretical research practice in action research by using soft systems methodology. Syst Pract Action Res. 2012;25(6):493–509.

[11] Hadi W, Prasetyo AK, Saraswati KA. Kajian beban pencemaran air sungai di Kota Malang dari aspek kualitas air, tata guna lahan, dan aspek kelembagaan. Seminar Teknologi Perencanaan, Perancangan, Lingkungan dan Infrastruktur II. FTSP I; 2021.

[12] Balqis, A., Siswoyo, H., & Yuliani, E. (2023). Penilaian kualitas air tanah dan pengaruhnya terhadap kesehatan masyarakat di Kecamatan Sukun Kota Malang. Jurnal Sains dan Edukasi Sains, 6(2), 65-74.. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v6i2p65 74.

[13] Kementrian Perencanaandan Pembangunan. (2022). Green Economy Index. Jakarta. Accessed July 13, 2024..

[14] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.

[15] Henderson A, Trede F. Strengthening attainment of student learning outcomes during work-integrated learning: A collaborative governance framework across academia, industry, and students. Asia-Pac J Coop Educ. 2017;18(1):7.

[16] Tuurnas S, Stenvall J, Virtanen PJ, Pekkola E, Kurkela K. Towards collaborative development culture in local government organisations. Int J Public Sector Management. 2019;32(6):582–99.

[17] Ovseiko, P. V., O’Sullivan, C., Powell, S. C., Davies, S. M., & Buchan, A. M. (2014). Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: Evidence from the National Health Service in England. BMC Health Services R.

[18] Jackson M, Stewart RA, Beal CD. Identifying and overcoming barriers to collaborative sustainable water governance in remote Australian indigenous communities. Water. 2019;11(11):2410.

[19] Rubasundram GA, Rasiah R. Corruption and good governance: an analysis of ASEAN’s e-governance experience. J Southeast Asian Econ. 2019;36(1):57–70.

[20] Fadhilah A, Haribowo R. AnalisisKualitas Air berdasarkanTata Guna Lahan di Sungai Bango. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya Air. 2023;3(2):104–12.

[21] Hasan H, Sasongko I, Poerwati T. Konsep Penanganan Sanitasi Permukiman Kumuh di Kecamatan Lowokwaru, Kota Malang. TATALOKA. 2020;22(1):83–93.