Published date:Oct 08 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference in Social Science (4th ICONISS): Governance and Poverty Alleviation

Pages:295–301

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i27.17112

Achmad Fauzi Wongsojudowabiqail@gmail.comDepartment Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Bonaventura NgarawulaDepartment Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Sukardi ‎ Department Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

The local government’s policy on providing rice for Civil Servants (ASN) in Sumenep Regency expresses a commitment to supporting local farmers by purchasing agricultural products as a gesture of appreciation. This study aims to assess the impact of the rice provision policy for ASN in the Sumenep Regency Government. Employing a qualitative research methodology, data collection focuses on social phenomena. Grounded in constructivist philosophy, the qualitative approach explores natural settings, with the researcher as the primary instrument. Data sources are purposively sampled using a snowball technique, employing triangulation in data collection. Inductive and qualitative data analysis, emphasizing the generalizability of meaning, reveals that the policy can boost local rice demand, providing opportunities for farmers to increase sales and income. The program’s implementation has potential social and political implications. A successful and positively received program can enhance the regional government’s image and garner political support. However, disparities exist in benefits received by government departments (OPD) and Civil Servants (ASN) under the rice provision policy.

Keywords: Civil Servants (ASN), policy implementation, local government

[1] Howlett M. Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy Adm. 2019;34(4):405–30.

[2] Terpstra J, Fyfe NR. Mind the implementation gap? Police reform and local policing in the Netherlands and Scotland. Criminol Crim Justice. 2015;15(5):527–44.

[3] Paudel NR. A critical account of policy implementation theories: status and reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance. 2009;25(2):36– 54.

[4] Howlett M, McConnell A, Perl A. Moving policy theory forward: connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis. Aust J Public Adm. 2017;76(1):65–79.

[5] Pressman J, Wildavsky A. Implementation. California: University of Cal Press; 1973.

[6] Creswell JW. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (edisi terjemahan). 4th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2016.

[7] Dunn WN. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Edisi Terjemahan). 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2003.

[8] Wibawa S. Kebijakan Publik :Proses dan Analisis, Cet.Ke-1. Jakarta: Intermedia; 1994.

[9] Jatmikowati S, Dinata C, Noorsetya B. Governance Autonomy to Improve Service Quality with Dynamic Linkage of Civil Society Organizations in Development Policy. In: Proceedings of the 1st Tidar International Conference on Advancing Local Wisdom Towards Global Megatrends, TIC 2020, 21-22 October 2020, Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 2021 Nov 4.