Published date: Oct 08 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference in Social Science (4th ICONISS): Governance and Poverty Alleviation

Pages: 61–75

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i27.17091

Puguh Wiji Pamungkassayyafazzam2@gmail.comSocial Sciences Doctoral Program, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Identity politics is a threat to democracy in many countries, including Indonesia. At the same time, in Indonesia, the number of Muslim voters reached 80%. Muslim voters are the majority group and are vulnerable to identity politics, given their character that is easily influenced to follow certain behaviors. This research has an urgency to reveal how big the threat of identity politics is to Muslim voters, especially in Malang Regency, East Java. The choice of Malang Regency, East Java, as the object of the research is attributed to the fact that the majority of the population in that location are traditional Muslims, and Muslim educational institutions, such as Islamic boarding schools and Muslim schools, are the most numerous in East Java. This research uses a qualitative analytical approach to reveal the phenomenon of identity politics among Muslim voters carried out by political parties. The findings of this research revealed that identity politics is strengthening among Muslim voters, driven by three factors: political elites, mass media, and institutions. This is relevant to the theory put forward by Theresia Kuhn. However, there are other factors that strengthen identity politics that are not put forward by Kuhn, namely, ideological factors. The ideology of the party is the same as the ideology of the majority of voters. This is a novelty in this study, which differs from Kuhn’s research and other studies.

Keywords: Muslim voters, identity politics in Indonesia, political parties

[1] Hidayaturrahman M, Ngarawula B, Sadhana K. Political investors: political elite oligarchy and mastery of regional resources in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics. 2022;7(2):269–81.

[2] Noury A, Roland G. Identity politics and populism in Europe. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2020;23(1):421–41.

[3] Marchlewska M, Cichocka A, Panayiotou O, Castellanos K, Batayneh J. Populism as identity politics: perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018;9(2):151–62.

[4] Kallis A. Populism, sovereigntism, and the unlikely re-emergence of the territorial nation-state. Fudan J Humanit Soc Sci. 2018;11(3):285–302.

[5] Petsinis V. Identity politics and right-wing populism in Estonia: the case of EKRE. Nationalism Ethn Polit. 2019;25(2):211–30.

[6] González-Ruibal A, González PA, Criado-Boado F. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity. 2018;92(362):507–15.

[7] Valbjørn M. What’s so sectarian about sectarian politics? Identity politics and authoritarianism in a new Middle East. Stud Ethn Natl. 2019;19(1):127–49.

[8] Kumar P. Rerouting the narrative: mapping the online identity politics of the Tamil and Palestinian diaspora. Soc Media Soc. 2018;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764429

[9] Mietzner M. Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization. 2020;27(6):1021–36.

[10] Hadiz VR, Chryssogelos A. Populism in world politics: a comparative cross-regional perspective. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2017;38(4):399–411.

[11] Börzel TA, Risse T. From the Euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. J Eur Public Policy. 2018;25(1):83–108.

[12] Agur I. Populism and central bank independence [comment]. Open Econ Rev. 2018;29(3):687–93.

[13] Hirvonen O, Pennanen J. Populism as a pathological form of politics of recognition. Eur J Soc Theory. 2019;22(1):27–44.

[14] McCall L, Orloff AS. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. presidential election of 2016. Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68(S1 Suppl 1):S34–56.

[15] Bang H, Marsh D. Populism: a major threat to democracy? Policy Stud. 2018;39(3):352–63.

[16] Lestari YS. Politik identitas di Indonesia: antara nasionalisme dan agama. Journal of Politics and Policy. 2018;1(1):19–28.

[17] Renhoard JM. Politik identitas era orde baru di Indonesia memasuki era reformasi. Menyambut Pesta Demokrasi. 2019;6(1):115–31.

[18] Saputro A. Agama dan negara: politik identitas menuju pilpres 2019. Asketik: Jurnal Agama dan Perubahan Sosial. 2023;2(2): 111–119.

[19] Kiftiyah A. Reconciliation efforts of identity politics post of election 2019 in Indonesia. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan. 2019;3(1):63–74.

[20] Samosir O, Novitasari I. Hak politik warga negara dalam cengkeraman politik identitas: refleksi menuju pemilu serentak nasional tahun 2024. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora dan Politik. 2022;2(3):332–46.

[21] Soenjoto WP. Eksploitasi isu politik identitas terhadap identitas politik pada generasi milineal Indonesia di era 4.0. Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities. 2019;4(2):187–217.

[22] Alfaqi MZ. Memahami Indonesia melalui prespektif nasionalisme, politik identitas, serta solidaritas. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. 2015;28(2): 113–14.

[23] Wingarta IP, Helmy B, Hartono D, Mertadana IW, Wicaksono R. The influence of identity politics on Indonesian democracy. Jurnal Lemhanas RI. 2021;9(4):121.

[24] Sosiawan EA, Wibowo R. Kontestasi berita hoax pemilu presiden tahun 2019 di media daring dan media sosial. JIK: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 2019;17(2):133–4.

[25] Prasetia AR. Pengaruh politik identitas melalui media sosial terhadap generasi milenial dan pelaksanaan pemilu. In: Conference On Communication and News Media Studies, Vol. 1; 2019. p. 21.

[26] Mayrudin YM. The political struggle for the identity of Islamic political parties: a study of PAN, PKB and PKS. MADANI: Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan. 2019;11(2):172–83.

[27] Oppermann M. Triangulation methodological discussion. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2000;2(2):142–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522- 1970(200003/04)2:2<141::AID-JTR217>3.0.CO;2-U

[28] Hussein A. The use of triangulation in social sciences research: can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work. 2009;4(1):5–8.

[29] Miles M, Huberman M, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. California: Sage; 2014.

[30] Hill J, Wilson T. Identity politics and the politics of identities. Identities (Yverdon). 2003;10(1):1–8.

[31] Bernstein M. Identity politics. Annu Rev Sociol. 2005;31(1):47–74.

[32] Sosiawan EA, Wibowo R. Representation of identity politics in online campaigns for party legislative candidates political participants in the 2014 election. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 2015;13(3):239–40.

[33] Yehezkiel PW, Takalamingan M. The role of political parties overcoming identity politics in elections. Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia. 2023;4(2):257–68.

[34] Huda IWAU, Hulhak Z, Bajuri A. Masyumi party: a beacon of understanding positive identity politics in Indonesia. HISTORIA; Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah. 2023;6(1):25–34.

[35] Kabir NA. Identity politics in India: Gujarat and Delhi Riots. J Muslim Minor Aff. 2020;40(3):395–409.

[36] Porat GB, Filc D. Remember to be Jewish: religious populism in Israel. Politics Relig. 2022;15(1):61–84.

[37] Saada N, Gross Z. Why don’t you become Jewish: identity politics in the encounter between Arab teachers and Jewish students in Israel. Res Pap Educ. 2021;36(4):423– 38.

[38] Siddiqi FH. Intra-ethnic fissures in ethnic movements: the rise of Mohajir identity politics in post-1971 Pakistan. Asian Ethn. 2010;11(1):25–41.

[39] Verkaaik O. Violence and ethnic identity politics in Karachi and Hyderabad. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies. 2016;39(4):841–54.

[40] Kuhn T. Grand theories of European integration revisited: does identity politics shape the course of European integration? J Eur Public Policy. 2019;26(8):1213–30.

[41] Mosca G. On the ruling class. In: Parsons T, editor. Theories of society: foundations of modern social theory. New York: Free Press; 1961.

[42] Friedrich CJ. A critique of Pareto’s contribution to the theory of a political elite. Cah Vilfredo Pareto. 1965;3(5):259–67.

[43] Warren M. Max Weber’s liberalism for a Nietzschean world. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1988;82(1):31–50.

[44] Lee EJ. Effectiveness of politicians’ soft campaign on Twitter versus TV: cognitive and experiential routes. J Commun. 2013;63(5):953–74.

[45] Mullins WA. On the concept of ideology in political science. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1972;66(2):498–510.

[46] Keane W. On semiotic ideology. Signs Soc (Chic). 2018;6(1):65–8.

[47] Jost JT. The end of ‘the end of ideology’. Am Psychol. 2006 Oct;61(7):651–70.

[48] Higley J. Elite theory and elites. Handbooks of sociology and social research. New York: Springer; 2010.

[49] Marcos-Marne H, Plaza-Colodro C, Freyburg T. Who votes for new parties? Economic voting, political ideology and populist attitudes. West Eur Polit. 2020;43(1):1–21.

[50] Kölln AK, Polk J. Emancipated party members: examining ideological incongruence within political parties. Party Polit. 2017;23(1):18–29.

[51] Ahler DJ. The group theory of parties: Identity politics, party stereotypes, and polarization in the 21st century. Forum (Germany). 2018;16(1): 3–22.