Published date: Oct 02 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference in Social Science (4th ICONISS): Urban Innovation

Pages: 122–132

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i26.17078

Rini Hakimirinihakimi@agr.unand.ac.idDepartment of Economic Society, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang City

Dian HafizahDepartment of Economic Society, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang City

Widya FitrianaDepartment of Economic Society, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang City

The development of local paddy varieties involves many stakeholders. Each stakeholder has a different role ranging from the socialization and farming to the marketing of local rice varieties. This research aims to identify stakeholders and analyze their role in developing local paddy varieties using a descriptive qualitative method. The respondents in this research are stakeholders involved in the development of local paddy varieties in Padang City. The results show that the stakeholders involved are the Padang City Agriculture Office, Agricultural Extension Center, farmers, farmer groups, landowners, seed breeders, production facilities providers, agricultural labor, rice milling units, collecting traders, colleges, sub-district administration, urban village administration, financial institutions, the Regional People’s Representative Council, retailers, and consumers. Classifications of stakeholders show that the Padang City Agriculture Office, the Agricultural Extension Center, farmers, and farmer groups have high influence and interest. These stakeholders are classified as key players. Meanwhile, sub-district administration, urban village administration, financial institutions, and Regional People’s Representative Council have low influence and interest. They are classified as the crowd. All of the stakeholders mentioned that roles play their position as policymakers, coordinators, facilitators, implementers, and accelerators.

Keywords: paddy, stakeholders, interest, power, role

[1] Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik Indonesia 2023. Jakarta. 2023.

[2] Kementerian Pertanian. Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2020- 2024. 2021.

[3] Satria B, Harahap EM. Peningkatan Produktivitas Padi Sawah (Oryza sativa L.) Melalui Penerapan Beberapa Jarak Tanam dan Sistem Tanam: the increased productivity of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) by application some distance planting and cropping system. Jurnal Agroekoteknologi ( JOA). 2017;5(3):629–37.

[4] Nurnayetti N. Keunggulan kompetitif padi sawah varietas lokal di sumatera barat. Jurnal pengkajian dan pengembangan teknologi pertanian. 2013;16(2):139809.

[5] Ricart S, Gandolfi C. Balancing irrigation multifunctionality based on key stakeholders’ attitudes: lessons learned from the Muzza system, Italy. Land Use Policy. 2017;69:461–73.

[6] Voegeli G, Finger DC. Disputed dams: mapping the divergent stakeholder perspectives, expectations, and concerns over hydropower development in Iceland and Switzerland. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021;72:101872.

[7] Sareen S. Energy distribution trajectories in two Western Indian states: comparative politics and sectoral dynamics. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;35:17–27.

[8] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Mixed methods procedures. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2009;3:203-225.

[9] Miles MB, Michael HA, Johnny S. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 2014.

[10] Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, et al. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1933–49.

[11] Ackermann F, Eden C. Strategic management of stakeholders: theory and practice. Long Range Plann. 2011;44(3):179–96.

[12] Rieznik S, Beom LH. The role of government in agricultural and rural development: review of agricultural policies in Ukraine after independence with a look at the EU and South Korea experience. Asian J Agric Rural Dev. 2018;8(2):132–45.

[13] Rafael BM. The importance of agricultural development projects: a focus on sustenance and employment creation in Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Rwanda, and Uganda. J Agric Chem Environ. 2023;12(2):152–70.

[14] Maryono M, Killoes AM, Adhikari R, Aziz AA. Agriculture development through multistakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Agric Syst. 2024;213:103792.

[15] Hamasalih CM, Layeeq TM. THE IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROGRAM IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FOR RURAL FARMERS: A REVIEW. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023;50(3):387–94.

[16] Shangshang S, Dan Y, Xiaojie L. Achieving coordinated development of multifunctional urban agriculture in Xiamen, China. Sustain Cities Soc. 2024;101:105070.