KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Online Paraphrasing Practices for Academic Writing in Indonesian Higher Education

Published date: Jul 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Joint Seminar on Education, Social Science and Applied Science (IJESAS)

Pages: 263–272

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i19.16506

Authors:

Fitriani ‎ fitri.marsude@ypup.ac.idEnglish Department, STKIP YPUP MAKASSAR

Adriani JihadEnglish Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Andi Haeriati AlimuddinEnglish Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar

M Dahlan BahangEnglish Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Abstract:

This research aims to examine how higher education students paraphrase their academic writing to reduce high Turnitin similarity scores. The research uses a descriptive–qualitative research design. Data were collected through observations and in-depth interviews. The observation was conducted by analyzing 20 higher education students’ theses in terms of paraphrasing practices. The in-depth interviews with five selected participants were conducted by asking some questions related to the observation results about paraphrasing practices. Based on the observation and the in-depth interviews, the researcher found that most of the students prefer to do paraphrasing practices online compared to paraphrasing practices manually. In addition, most students already know the meaning of paraphrasing but some students have not applied it adequately. The researchers conclude that online paraphrasing is a great idea that can be used to simplify paraphrasing activities. However, the students need to re-read the results of the paraphrase from the online paraphrase to be analyzed and revised if needed. It is crucial to focus on the overall quality of the paraphrased results, making sure to check for proper word choice and grammar. In addition, further research is required to determine the extent to which the text’s original context and meaning have been successfully maintained.

Keywords: academic writing, paraphrasing, online paraphrasing tool, Turnitin, higher education

References:

[1] Fatimah N. Students’ Needs for Academic Writing at the English Education Department [ELTEJ]. English Language Teaching Educational Journal. 2018;1(3):161– 75.

[2] S. Kongpetch, “Use of Citation Forms in Academic Writing of Thai Undergraduates.,” International Journal of Language and Literature. vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v9n1a1.

[3] Patak AA, Naim HA. “ESL/EFL Students Attitude toward Research Report Writing in Higher Education: A Literature Review.,” SSRN Electronic Journal. p. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2119602.

[4] A. Haliq and P. Wiedarti, “Self-Acces in Digital Literacy: Evaluating the Quality of Information and Reliability of Sources in Writing Academic Essay.,” INTERFERENCE: Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistics. vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2023. https://doi.org/10.26858/interference.v4i1.44561.

[5] Ludovico C, Wittig C. A Universe of Information, One Citation at a Time: How Students Engage with Scholarly Sources. J Libr Inf Serv Distance Learn. 2015;9(1–2):30–9.

[6] Thompson C, Morton J, Storch N. Where from, who, why and how? A study of the use of sources by first year L2 university students. J Engl Acad Purposes. 2013;12(2):99– 109.

[7] Gopee N, Deane M. Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Dec;33(12):1624–31.

[8] Agu N, Olibie E. “Evaluating Students’ Plagiarism in Higher Education Institutions,” African Research Review. vol. 3, no. 4, p. 2009. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v3i4.47571.

[9] Raihanah MM, Hashim RS, Zalipour A, Mustaffa MA. Developing a Critical Response, Avoiding Plagiarism among Undergraduate Students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;18:517–21.

[10] Rafiqa M. Taufiq Hidayat Pabbajah, R. Asfihana, R. Nazaruddin, and Latifah, “The Effect of Paraphrasing on Efl Students’ Writing at Indonesian Higher Education,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching. vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 335–345, 2023.

[11] Saglam AL, Tsagari D. “Evaluating Perceptions towards the Consequential Validity of Integrated Language Proficiency Assessment.,” Languages. vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2022.

[12] Bronshteyn K, Baladad R. Perspectives on … Librarians as Writing Instructors: Using Paraphrasing Exercises to Teach Beginning Information Literacy Students. J Acad Librariansh. 2006;32(5):533–6.

[13] Roig M. Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors. Ethics Behav. 2001;11(3):307–23.

[14] Keck C. Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A reexamination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. J Second Lang Writ. 2014;25(9):4– 22.

[15] Made HH, Yulia F. “Students’ Problems in Writing Paraphrases in Research Paper Writing Class.” LLT JOURNAL. vol. 15, no. 1, p.

[16] Shi L, Fazel I, Kowkabi N. Paraphrasing to transform knowledge in advanced graduate student writing. Engl Specif Purposes. 2018;51:31–44.

[17] Hirvela A, Du Q. Q.D.-J. of E. for A. Purposes, and undefined 2013, “‘Why am I paraphrasing?’: undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading,”. J Engl Acad Purposes. 2013;12(2):87–98.

[18] K.Y.- System and undefined 2003, “What prevents ESL/EFL writers from avoiding plagiarism?: Analyses of 10 North-American college websites.,” Elsevier. p.

[19] Shi L, Fazel I. N.K.-E. for S. Purposes, and undefined 2018, “Paraphrasing to transform knowledge in advanced graduate student writing. Volume 51. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 31– 44.

[20] Wilhoit S. “A brief guide to writing from readings.,” cir.nii.ac.jp. p. 2011.

[21] Prentice FM, Kinden CE. “Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: An exploratory study.,” International Journal for Educational Integrity. vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2018.

[22] Dale R. “Natural language generation: The commercial state of the art in 2020.,” cambridge.orgR DaleNatural Language Engineering, 2020cambridge.org. vol. 26, pp. 481–487, 2020.

[23] Kinga S. “Platforms: As foundation of sharing economy.,” indianjournals.comS Kinga, GS GuptaDelhi Business Review, 2021indianjournals.com. vol. 22, no. 1, p. 2021.

[24] Rogerson AM, McCarthy G. “Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?” International Journal for Educational Integrity. vol. 13, no. 1, p. 2017.

[25] Ansorge L, Ansorgeová K. M.S.- Publications, and undefined 2021, “Plagiarism through paraphrasing tools—the story of one plagiarized text.,” mdpi.comL Ansorge, K Ansorgeová, M SixsmithPublications, 2021mdpi.com. vol. 9, no. 4, p. 2021.

[26] Fitria TN. undefined Education, undefined and, and undefined 2021, “QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing,” jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.idTN FitriaEnglisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 2021jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id. vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 183–196, 2021.

[27] Lichtman M. “Understanding and evaluating qualitative educational research.,” p. 2010.

[28] Huberman M, Miles MB. “The qualitative researcher’s companion,” p. 2002. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274.

[29] S. Drivoka Sulistyaningrum, Utilizing Online Paraphrasing Tools to Overcome Students’ Paraphrasing Difficulties in Literature Reviews., 2021. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v6i2.11582.

[30] Rossi SL, Rossi SL. Revisioning Paraphrasing Instruction. 2022. pp. 411–29.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

142 Abstract Views

110 PDF Downloads