Published date: Jan 24 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 6th International Research Conference on Economics and Business (6th IRCEB)

Pages: 639–647

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i4.15107

Linda SeprillinaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Malang

Vika Annisa Qurratavika.annisa.fe@um.ac.idDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Malang

Wen-Chi HuangDepartment of Agribusiness Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology Taiwan

Ermita YusidaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Malang

Vidya PurnamasariDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Malang

The informal sector had become an essential pillar that takes over the economy of Indonesia. While the pandemic is dragging the economy to a low level, the informal sector needs more attention from the government. Bad governance of the informal sector will lead to the creation of an underground economy that impedes economic potential. In contrast, good governance will create more massive economic growth, which will lead to the development of the formal sector. The informal sector supports the economy of low and middle-income countries than the high-income country. That statement is also shown by the data that the informal sector support 8.33% of Indonesian gross domestic product (GDP). This research aims to measure the impact of the pandemic on the inclusive and underground economy from two different perspectives, owners and workers in the underground economy system. This research was conducted by using descriptive and quantitative analysis involving a dummy variable to capture the difference between before and during the pandemic. Using time-series data, this research shows that there are significant effects of the pandemic on the changing of income, consumption, and saving for both owners and workers. Moreover, some informal activists shift to different jobs to keep the proper way of living during the pandemic. The changing of four different aspects, certainly brings society’s prosperousness to a low level.

Keywords: inclusive growth, pandemic era, underground economy

[1] Radulescu I, Popescu C, Matei M. The dark side of global economy. In: Reynolds P, Bygrave W, Autio E, Hay M, editors. Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2002 Executive Monitor. London: London Business School; 2010.

[2] Schneider F, Buehn A, Montenegro C. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. Int Econ J. 2010;24(4):443–461.

[3] Aschauer DA. Is public expenditure productive? J Monet Econ. 1989;23(2):177–200.

[4] De Soto H. The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Harper Collins; 2000.

[5] Feige EL. “Underground activity and institutional change: Productive, protective and predatory behavior in transition economies” in transforming post communist political economies. In: Nelson, Tilly and Walker (eds) National Academy. In Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies. Washington: National Academy. 1997.

[6] Gujarati D. Ekonometri Dasar. Terjemahan. Sumarno Zain ( Jakarta): Erlangga; 2003.

[7] Kiani M, Ahmed A and Zaman K. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches for measuring underground economy in Pakistan. Quality and Quantity Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014;49(1):295-317.

[8] Esfahani HS, Ramirez MT. Institutions, infrastructure, and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics. 2003;70:443-477.

[9] Fugazza M, Francois JJ. Labor market institutions, taxation, and the underground economy. Journal of Public Economics. 2004;88(1-2).

[10] Lippert O, Walker M. The underground economy: Global evidences of its size and impact. Vancouver: The Frazer Institute; 1997

[11] Bajada C. Unemployment and the underground economy in Australia. Journal Applied Economics; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000291335.

[12] Voicu C. Economics and “underground” economy theory. Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2012;19(7).