Published date: Jun 21 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 4th International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 688–699

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i11.13582

Risky Yustianirisky.yustiani@gmail.comNIPA-School of Administration, Jakarta

Indonesia opened a new gas field in Kab. Banggai Province of Central Sulawesi withthe project name Donggi-Senoro. This LNG field project is the first project that uses adifferent system by separating owners and managers of the downstream and upstreamsections with an investment capital of $28 billion, where for the upstream regionIndonesia is represented by Pertamina also managing and owning a share capital of29%.In this study the authors tried to analyze the roles of the actors involved in the DSLNGproject development policy using policy response and public choice theory. This studyuses a case study approach in reconstructing the analysis based on data obtained inthe field, both primary and secondary data by conducting interviews and observations.The results of the study concluded that there were 3 major groups that became actorsand played a role in DSLNG project development activities, namely the governmentas policy makers and policy makers, the private sector as owners of capital and thecommunity and NGOs which were divided into groups that were pro and those whowere resistant to development policies. DSLNG project. The emergence of a responsethat is mostly resistant is a manifestation of the injustice of the policies and decisionsmade by the local government. The response given by the community was in theform of demonstrations, blocking roads and burning tires as a form of protest againstpolicies related to the construction of a DSLNG plant.

Keywords: public policy, public choice, policy response

[1] Keraf AS. Krisis dan Bencana Lingkungan Hidup Global. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2010.

[2] Nugroho, Riant D. Public Policy. Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo, 2009.

[3] Indiahono D. Public Disobdience: Telaah Penolakan Publik Terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2009.

[4] Putra F. Paradigma Kritis dalam Studi Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.

[5] Winarno BPM. Kebijakan Publik: Teori dan Proses. Yogyakarta: MedPress, 2005.

[6] Kusumanegara S. Model dan aktor dalam proses kebijakan publik. Gava Media 2010; 3: 53.

[7] Soeharto, Edi PD. Kebijakan Sosial Sebagai Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2007.

[8] Subakti R. Memahami Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Grasindo, 1992.

[9] Mas’oed M, Mc.Andrew C. Perbandingan Sistem Politik. 16th ed. Yogyakarta: UGM Press, 2010.

[10] Putra F. Kebijakan Tidak Untuk Publik. Yogyakarta: Resist Book, 2005.

[11] Tjokroamidjojo B. Pengantar Administrasi Pembangunan. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1995.

[12] Yustika AE. Ekonomi Politik (Kajian Teori dan Proses). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.

[13] Mosco V. The political economy of communication. SAGE Publications Inc., 2009. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2009. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279946.

[14] Grindle MS. Politics and Policy Implementation In The Third World. NewJersey Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.

[15] Rachbini DJ. Ekonomi Politik : Kebijakan dan Strategi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Granit, 2004.

[16] Capraso JA, Levine DP. Teori-Teori Ekonomi Politik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.

[17] Company Profile Donggi Senoro LNG.