Published date: Jun 21 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 4th International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 1–30

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i11.13537

Rosita Novi Andarirositanovi@gmail.comResearch Center of Community Welfare, Village and Connection, National Institute of Research and Innovation Agency

Rizky FitriaNational Institute of Public Administration

”End poverty in all its forms everywhere” is the ultimate goal and crucial element of the world’s SDGs 2030 transformative agendas, as well as in Indonesia. The COVID-19 pandemic has hindered Indonesia from achieving its SDGs targets and reducing poverty, including rural poverty. The village funds policy sourced from the state budget is one of the policies that aims to alleviate rural poverty; thus, there will be a reduction of disadvantageous villages and an enhancement of self-sustained villages in Indonesia. This study aims to investigate the impact of village funds on the improvement and autonomy status of villages in Indonesia. It utilizes a quantitative method, namely linear regression of panel data using the Village Building Index (VBI) as the dependent variable and village funds as the independent variable over 2018-2021 in each regency/city in Indonesia. The result suggests that the village fund policy, through the 10% allocation of the state budget, has a positive and significant effect on changes in the improvement and autonomy status of the villages in Indonesia. The finding using the model (lin-log) tells us that a 1% increase in village funds will raise the VBI by 0.0013. This indicates that the village funds policy has contributed to the achievement of rural poverty alleviation goals, or it could be a pro-poor policy in order to achieve the purpose of the 1st SDGs goal.

Keywords: SDGs, poverty, village funds policy, improvement and autonomy status of villages

[1] Sobczak E, Bartniczak B, Raszkowski A. Implementation of the no poverty sustainable development goal (SDG) in visegrad group (v4). Sustain. 2021;13(3):1–21.

[2] Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP. A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth’s Futur. 2017;5(11):1169–1179.

[3] Leal Filho W, Lovren VO, Will M, Salvia AL, Frankenberger F. Poverty: A central barrier to the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Environ Sci Policy [Internet]. 2021;125(August):96–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.020

[4] Fenner R, Cernev T. The implications of the Covid-19 pandemic for delivering the Sustainable Development Goals. Futures [Internet]. 2021;128( July 2020):102726. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102726

[5] Fonseca LM, Domingues JP, Dima AM. Mapping the sustainable development goals relationships. Sustain. 2020;12(8):1–15.

[6] Yang S, Zhao W, Liu Y, Cherubini F, Fu B, Pereira P. Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert’s knowledge evaluation. Geogr Sustain [Internet]. 2020;1(4):321–330. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004

[7] Sebestyén V, Domokos E, Abonyi J. Focal points for sustainable development strategies—Text mining-based comparative analysis of voluntary national reviews. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2020;263:110414. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110414

[8] Yu Y, Huang J. Poverty reduction of sustainable development goals in the 21st Century: A bibliometric analysis. Front Commun. 2021;6(October):1–15.

[9] Zhou Y, Liu Y. The geography of poverty: Review and research prospects. J Rural Stud [Internet]. 2022;93:408–416. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/ inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060854799&doi=10.1016{%}2Fj.jrurstud.2019.01. 008&partnerID=40&md5=142efeecadd1bc8d1b588587ae0cbb42

[10] Hanandita W, Tampubolon G. Multidimensional Poverty in Indonesia: Trend Over the Last Decade (2003–2013). Soc Indic Res. 2016;128(2):559–587.

[11] Hadi SP, Mohd Ibrahim H, Bulan P, Suryoko S. Pandemic, SDGs, and CSR: Case study of Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2020;202:1–5.

[12] BPS-Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Indonesia 2020. Jakarta: BPS-Statistics Indonesia; 2020. p. 255–256.

[13] BPS-Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: BPS-Statistics Indonesia; 2022. 274–275 p.

[14] Andari RN. Kebijakan Pendapatan Desa Yang Bersumber Dari Alokasi Apbn (Dana Desa) di Indonesia Masa Reformasi 1999-2015 (Studi tentang Perubahan Kebijakan Pendapatan Desa yang Bersumber dari Alokasi APBN/Dana Desa). Responsive. 2018;1(1):12.

[15] Imanuddin, Mulyono, Nasrullah, Riyadi S, Prianto A, Devi AL. Buku Pintar Dana Desa (Dana Desa untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat) [Internet]. Proposal SIMLITAMAS. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan; 2019. Available from: https://drive.google.com/u/0/uc?id=1Cfi3P2BhcwRAWB- _TCK3SmQbCRspzfwS&export=download

[16] Sigit TA, Kosasih A. Pengaruh Dana Desa terhadap Kemiskinan: Studi Tingkat Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia. Indones Treas Rev J Perbendaharaan Keuang Negara dan Kebijak Publik. 2020;5(2):105–119.

[17] Jumiati E, Adam D. Pengaruh Program Dana Desa Terhadap Perekonomian Masyarakat, Perluasan Lapangan Kerja dan Peluang Usaha Masyarakat Desa (Studi Deskriptif Korelasi pada 10 Desa di Kabupaten Purwakarta). Lisyabab J Stud Islam dan Sos [Internet]. 2020;1(2):2722–8096. Available from: https://lisyabab-staimas.ejournal. id/lisyabab

[18] Arfiansyah MA. Dampak Dana Desa Dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Di Jawa Tengah. J Stud Islam dan Sos [Internet]. 2020;1(c):91–106. Available from: https://lisyabab-staimas.e-journal.id/lisyabab%0ADampak

[19] Faoziyah U, Salim W. Seeking prosperity through village proliferation: An evidence of the implementation of village funds (Dana Desa) in Indonesia. J Reg City Plan. 2020;31(2):97–121.

[20] Gusti Y, Agustar A, Osmet. Pemanfaatan Dana Desa dan Kaitannya dengan Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. J Ilm MEA (Manajemen, Ekon dan Akuntansi). 2020;4(2):265–285.

[21] Hastono T, Syah F. Alternative solutions for determining village funds using weight product method. In: RR, editor. 7th International Conference on DV-Xa Method: The Advances-Related Experiments and Theories on Material Science, ICDM 2019 [Internet]. Universitas Pgri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing; 2020. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085660576&doi= 10.1088{%}2F1757-899X{%}2F835{%}2F1{%}2F012029&partnerID=40&md5= 801cfcc0e3c65573c4d71edd96c51ed7

[22] Ernawati E, Tajuddin T, Nur S. Does government expenditure affect regional inclusive growth? An experience of implementing village fund policy in Indonesia. Economies [Internet]. 2021;9(4). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid= 2-s2.0-85119055882&doi=10.3390{%}2Feconomies9040164&partnerID=40&md5= d41898afd7e2f185745a524b5cbde64a

[23] Yulitasari Y, Tyas WP. Dana Desa dan Status Desa di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. J Reg Rural Dev Plan. 2020;4(2):74–83.

[24] Arina AIS, Masinambow V, Walewangko EN. Pengaruh Dana Desa Dan Alokasi Dana Desa Terhadap Indeks Desa Membangun Di Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara. Pembang Ekon dan Keuang Drh. 2021;22(3):22–41.

[25] Kharisma B, Taifur WD, Muharja F. Dampak Anggaran, Kesulitan Geografis, dan Rumah Tangga Desa terhadap Status Desa di Provinsi Riau. J Reg Rural Dev Plan. 2021;5(3):187–202.

[26] Iftitah AE, Wibowo P. Pengaruh Dana Desa, Alokasi Dana Desa, Dan Pendapatan Asli Desa Terhadap Indeks Desa Membangun Di Kabupaten Gowa. J Ilmu Pemerintah Widya Praja. 2022;48(1):17–36.

[27] Alhaqi RN. Pengaruh Dana Desa Terhadap Perkembangan Kemandirian Desa di Kecamatan Gantung. J Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Ekon. 2022;3(2):75–97.

[28] Adekayanti N, Achyani F. Pengaruh Dana Desa terhadap Kemandirian Wilayah dan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah pada Tahun 2016-2020. In: Webinar Nasional Dewan Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Alumni Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta dalam Rangka Dies Natalis ke-58 UNY. 2022. p. 25–32.

[29] Artha DRP, Dartanto T. The Multidimensional Approach to Poverty Measurement in Indonesia: Measurements, Determinants and Its Policy Implications. J Econ Coop Dev. 2018;39(3):1–38.

[30] Leal Filho W, Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio J, Dinis MAP, Sharifi A, Venkatesan M, Donkor FK, et al. Transient poverty in a sustainable development context. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 2022;29(5):415–428.

[31] Chaudhry I, Malik S, Faridi MZ. Factors Affecting Rural Poverty : A Qualitative Approach. JHSS. 2007;XV(March):107–109.

[32] Sumner A. Meaning versus measurement: Why do “economic” indicators of poverty still predominate? Dev Pract. 2007;17(1):4–13.

[33] Sompolska-Rzechula A, Kurdys-Kujawska A. Assessment of the Development of Poverty in EU Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7).

[34] Osmani SR, Latif MA. The Pattern and Determinants of Poverty in Rural Bangladesh: 2000-2010. Bangladesh Dev Stud [Internet]. 2013;XXXVI(2):2000–2010. Available from: https://about.jstor.org/terms

[35] Wang Y, Jiang Y, Yin D, Liang C, Duan F. Examining Multilevel Poverty-Causing Factors in Poor Villages: a Hierarchical Spatial Regression Model [Internet]. Vol. 14, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. Springer Netherlands; 2021. p. 969–998. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-021-09388-1

[36] Zhang J, Zuo F, Zhou Y, Zhai M, Mei L, Fu Y, et al. Analyzing influencing factors of rural poverty in typical poverty areas of Hainan Province: A case study of Lingao County. Chinese Geogr Sci. 2018;28(6):1061–1076.

[37] UNDP, OPHI. Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2021 Unmasking Disparities by Ethnicity, Caste and Gender OPHI [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents//2021mpireportenpdf.pdf

[38] Firdausy CM, Budisetyowati DA. Variables, Dimensions, and Indicators Important to Develop the Multidimensional Poverty Line Measurement in Indonesia [Internet]. Vol. 162, Social Indicators Research. Springer Netherlands; 2022. p. 763–802. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02859-5

[39] DJPK Kementrian Keuangan. Rincian Alokasi Transfer ke Daerah dan Dana Desa (TKDD) dalam APBN Tahun Anggaran 2022 [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DBH-DAU-DIDOtsus- Dais-Dandes-TA-2022.pdf

[40] DJPK Kementrian Keuangan. Rincian Alokasi Transfer ke Daerah dan Dana Desa (TKDD) dalam APBN Tahun Anggaran 2021 [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Dana-Desa_rotated.pdf

[41] DJPK Kementrian Keuangan. Perubahan Rincian Dana Desa Menurut Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Tahun Anggaran 2018 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PMK-226- Tahun-2017-edit.pdf

[42] DJPK Kementrian Keuangan. Rincian Alokasi Transfer ke Daerah dan Dana Desa (TKDD) Dalam APBN Tahun Anggaran 2020 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/7.-DANA-DESA.pdf

[43] DJPK Kementrian Keuangan. Rincian Alokasi Transfer ke Daerah dan Dana Desa (TKDD) dalam APBN Tahun Anggaran 2019 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DANA-DESA-1.pdf

[44] Madjid T, Rachmawaty R, Fachri M, Agusta I, Hariyanti, Sukoyo, et al. Status Indeks Desa Membangun Provinsi Kabupaten Kecamatan Tahun 2019 [Internet]. DJPPMD Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi. 2019. p. 152–158. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qKPIXOpJLvSN8U6s8q_ PpmP8Umtuib_/view

[45] Direktorat Jenderal Pembangunan Desa dan Perdesaan. Peringkat Nilai Rata- Rata Indeks Desa Membangun Tahun 2022 [Internet]. Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi; 2022. p. 5–12. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-uatOklifanBRJ7WH58Vi1Y_5pfVDdpG/view

[46] Direktorat Jenderal Pembangunan Desa dan Perdesaan. Peringkat Indeks Desa Membangun Tahun 2021 [Internet]. Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi; 2021. p. 4–12. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ng9MJ2vlUjPceQ4f2pNKgWnmXy-eWe6Z/view

[47] Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi. Peringkat Indeks Desa Membangun Tahun 2018 [Internet]. Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi; 2018. p. 3–9. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YnruFhFeYanLEZ0e5XGxIbhuOdOoTX9r/view

[48] Madjid T, Rachmawaty R, Fachri M, Wikantosa B, Nagoro NS, Uguy LS, et al. Peringkat Status IDM Tahun 2020 [Internet]. Peringkat Status IDM Provinsi-Kabupaten-Kecamatan-Desa Tahun 2020. Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi; 2020. p. 4–12. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Rz5Qz-wWCY3_imH_FLom0ORFxYaLBe96/view

[49] Srihardiati M, Mustafid, Prahutama A. Metode Regresi Data Panel Untuk Peramalan Konsumsi Energi Di Indonesia. J Gaussian. 2016;5(3):475-485.

[50] Hoechle D. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J. 2007;7(3):281–312.

[51] Sitorus YM, Yuliana L. Penerapan Regresi Data Panel Pada Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Belanja Pemerintah Fungsi Kesehatan di Indonesia Tahun 2010-2014. Media Stat. 2018;11(1):1–15.

[52] Dewi SS. Analysis of the impact of village funds on regional development in Klaten Regency. Repos UMS [Internet]. 2021;(Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Available from: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/95305