Published date: May 26 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI)

Pages: 1038–1046

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i9.13418

M. Syafi'ie154101314@uii.ac.idDepartment of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia,

The community of persons with disabilities currently disputes the regulation on amnesty. Amnesty is considered discriminatory and violates the rights of persons with disabilities, especially those with mental disabilities. The amplification rule, which means that persons with disabilities do not have legal capacity, is considered inconsistent with the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (CRPD), which substantively stipulates that persons with disabilities do have the legal capacity and that the government is obliged to take measures to provide access to the necessary support that is needed, known as the supportive decision-making system.

Keywords: Persons with Disabilities, Amnesty, Supportive Decision Making

[1] S. M. Difabel Mental dan Hukum. Republika; 2021.

[2] W. J. Zulhendra S. Syafi’ie M, Kapasitas Hukum : Diabel Sebagai Subyek Perdata dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: SIGAB; 2008.

[3] D. II. Pelaksanaan Hak dan Kewajiban Perdata Orang yang Tidak Cakap Hukum di Kabupaten Sleman Mimb Huk.2008;20(3).

[4] Damayanti YR. Training Piloting Jaksa tentang Peradilan yang Fair (Fair Trial) bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Berhadapan Hukum.

[5] O. Y. Ikhtiar H, “Naskah Laporan Penelitian Gambaran Disabilitas Psikososial di Indonesia: Pemetaan Isu-Isu Strategis,” 2021.

[6] Wahjono P. Indonesia berdasarkan atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia; 1986. 7. R. M. A Training Manual on International Human Rights Law. London; 2021.

[7] G. KB, “Supported Decision-Making and the Human Right of Legal Capacity,” 2015.

[8] G. P, “Supported Decision Making : A Rights Based Disability Concept and Its Implication for Mental Health,”. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2013.

[9] Z. S. Widijantoro J, Syafi’ie M, Wahyu T, “Analisis Putusan Difabel.”

[10] S. G. Devi N. Jerome, “Moving Toward Subsititued or Supported Decision Making? Article 12 of the Convention on The Rights of Persons With Disabilities. Volume 5. ALTER, Eur J Disabil Res; 2011.

[11] S. M. Salim I. Hidup dalam Kerentanan : Narasi Kecil Keluarga Difabel Yogyakarta, 2015.

[12] Ro’fah. Teori Disabilitas : sebuah review literatur. J Difabel. 2015;2(2).

[13] U. R. Kapasitas Hukum: Difabel sebagai Subyek Hukum Perdata dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2020.

[14] T. E. Harding R. Supported Decision Making From Theory to Practice: Implementing the Right to Enjoy Legal Cakacity. Societas. 2018.

[15] S. C. Devi N, Bickenbach J. Moving Toward Substituted or Supported Decision Making? Article 12 of the Convention on The Rights of Persons with Disabilities ScienceDirect.

[16] R. G. Mental Disabilities and the Law: From Substitute to Supported Decision- Making? Curr Leg Probl. 2012.

[17] A.-K. A. Future Direction in Supported Decision Making. Disabil Stud Q. 2017;37(1).