Published date: May 26 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI)

Pages: 187–197

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i9.13331

Miki Tjandramiki.tjandra@art.maranatha.eduUniversitas Kristen Maranatha

Seriwati GintingUniversitas Kristen Maranatha

Abdul Rahmat .Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Currently Pancasila and its values are being ignored. There are indications to reject Pancasila after the reformation. Nationalism as the unifier in diversity began to evaporate. Various problems related to ideological, political, legal, economic, religious issues came to the surface. All of this needs to be considered as a threat to national harmony. What has happened to the Dayak and Madura tribes is one proof that the problem of ethnocentrism exists and will arise if we are not aware of it. The role of civic education, especially at the university level, needs to be studied whether it still functions as social control or only as a formality. The method in this study uses sequential explanatory mixed methods. Through this research, civic education learning will be traced and analyzed more in-depth at the university level in terms of the material provided, whether it is still one-way in nature, or it is applicable related to real phenomena in students, by focusing on their life experiences.

Keywords: civic education, nationalism, Pancasila, social control, university

[1] Budimansyah D. Pendidikan Karakter: Nilai Inti Bagi Upaya Pembinaan Kepribadian Bangsa. Bandung: Widaya Aksara Press dan Laboratorium PKn UPI; 2011.

[2] Sukino JA, Sulha. Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan di Perguruan Tinggi (Cet. 2). Depok: Rajawali Pers; 2020.

[3] Winarno. Paradikma Baru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Panduan Kuliah di Perguruan Tinggi. Surakarta: Bumi Aksara. 2009.

[4] Isra S. Pemilu dan Pemulihan Daulat Rakyat. Themis Books; 2017.

[5] Cholisin. Ilmu Kewarganegaraan. Yogya karta: Ombak; 2016.

[6] Syaifullah WS. Ilmu Kewarga negaraan (Civics). Bandung: Penerbit Labolatorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan; 2008.

[7] Erwin M. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama; 2017.

[8] Kalidjernih FK. Puspa Ragam Konsep dan Isu Kewarganegaraan. Bandung: Widya Aksara Press; 2009.

[9] Driyarkara. Karya Lengkap Driyarkara: Esai-Esai Filsafat Pemikir yang Terlibat Penuh dalam Perjuangan Bangsanya. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2006.

[10] Soebhan, S. R. dkk. (2017). Relasi Nasionalisme dan Globalisasi Kontemporer: Sebuah Kajian Konseptual. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

[11] Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta

[12] Kristiadi, J. dkk. (2020). Ancaman Radikalisme dalam Negara Pancasila. Jakarta: Kanisius

[13] Sunatra. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter: Nilai Inti Bagi Upaya Pembinaan Kepribadian Bangsa: Internalisasi Karakter Bangsa Perkokoh Kepribadian dan Identitas Nasional. Bandung: Widya Aksara Press & Laboratorium PKn UPI

[14] Ginting, S. (2020). Dosen Penggerak dalam Era MBKM: Peran Dosen dalam Membangun Karakter dan Menumbuhkan Eksistensi Nasionalisme Era Milenial. Gorontalo: Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri

[15] Isnarmi, I. (2011). Pendekatan Kritis-Transformatif dalam PKn: Sebuah Upaya Pengembangan Karakter (Good Character).

[16] Setiawan, Y. B. (2018). Kontestasi Isu Kebhinekaan dalam Media Sosial.

[17] Ambarudin, R. I. (2016). Pendidikan multikultural untuk membangun bangsa yang nasionalis religius. Jurnal Civics, 13(1), 28-45.

[18] Yewangu, A. A. (2011). Agama dan Kerukunan. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia