Published date: May 16 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Learning Innovation and Research in Basic Education (ICLIRBE)

Pages: 299–311

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i8.13305

Fakhruddin .fakhruddin.z@lecturer.unri.ac.idUniversitas Riau, Indonesia

Yunita AyanaUniversitas Riau, Indonesia

Zulfarina .Universitas Riau, Indonesia

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the PhET- assisted argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model on students argumentation skills as an essential aspect of the skills needed by humans in the 21st century. The type of research used is quasi-experimental (quasi-research) with a posttest research design-only control group design. The research instrument uses test questions and information analysis techniques using an independent t-test. The results of the analysis show that there is effectiveness in the application of the argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model assisted by PhET on the argumentation ability of students on the material pressure of substances at SMPN 1 Koto Gasib as evidenced by the average score of the experimental class which is higher than the control class students, namely 59, 13 53. 15 and based on sig.(2- tailed) which is 0. 007< 0. 05, then there is a significant difference in the average value between the experimental and control classes. Based on the results of the information analysis, it was concluded that there was a substantial difference between the students argumentation skills in the experimental class and the control class. The results of this study indicate that the application of the PhETassisted argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model is very effective in developing students argumentation skills.

Keywords: effectiveness, argument-driven, inquiry argumentation

[1] Hidayah R, Salimi M, Susiani TS. Critical thinking skill: konsep dan inidikator penilaian. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-an. 2017;1(2):127-133.

[2] Handayani P. Analisis Argumentasi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Palembang dengan Menggunakan Model Argumentasi Toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika. 2015;2(1):60-68.

[3] Siregar N, Pakpahan RA. Kemampuan Argumentasi IPA Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI). LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA. 2020;10(2):94-103.

[4] Afisha HM, Jalmo T, Maulina D. Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah. 2015;3(5).

[5] Hidayah TL, Supeno S, Nuha U. Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Menggunakan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Edsuaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi. 2022;9(1):239-250.

[6] Deng Y, Wang H. Research on evaluation of Chinese Students’ competence in written scientific argumentation in the context of chemistry. Chem Educ Res Practice. 2017;18(1):127–150

[7] OECD. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.

[8] Imaniar BO, Supeno S, Lesmono AD. Argumentation of senior high school students on physics instruction based inquiry. Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika. 2020;7(1):35-47. Sudjana. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Sinar Baru Algensindo; 2015.

[9] Suraya, Setiadi AE, Muldayanti ND. Argumentasi Ilmiah dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Metode Debat. Edusains. 2019;11(2):233–241.

[10] Kurniasari IS, Setyarsih W. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika ( JIPF). 2017;6(3):171– 174.

[11] Dewa E, Mukin MUJ, Pandango O. Pengaruh pembelajaran daring berbantuan laboratorium virtual terhadap minat dan hasil belajar kognitif fisika. Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan ( JARTIKA). 2020;3(2):351-359.

[12] Fithriani SL, Halim A, Khaldun I. Penggunaan Media Simulasi PhET Dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Kalor di SMA Negeri 12 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia. 2016;4(2):45-52.

[13] Erika F, Prahani BK. Innovative chemistry learning model to improve argumentation skills and self-efficacy. Iosr J Res Method Educ (Iosrjrme). 2017;7(1):62-68.

[14] Marhamah OS, Nurlaelah I, Setiawati I. Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (Adi) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi. 2017;9(2):39-45.

[15] Sampson V, Grooms J, Walker JP. Argument?driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Sci Educ. 2011;95(2):217-257.

[16] Sampson V, Walker JP. Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write in chemistry. Int J Sci Educ. 2012;34(10):1443-1485.

[17] Neni H. ”The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models.” J Univ Teach Learn Practice. 2020;17(1):6.

[18] Ismail I, Permanasari A, Setiawan W. STEM-based virtual lab effectiveness in improving the scientific literacy of students with gender differences. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. 2016;2(2):190–201.

[19] Hasibuan FA, Abidin J. Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Berbasis PhET Simulation Mata Kuliah Fisika Modern. Eksakta: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran MIPA. 2020;5(1):81-86.

[20] Fatmawati ZA, Susilowati SME, Iswari RS. Effect of argument driven inquiry (ADI) with problem solving method for student�? ?? S argumentation and critical thinking skills. J Innov Sci Educ. 2019;8(3):255-263.

[21] Hunaidah M, Erniwati E, Sukariasih L. Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Inkuiri Peserta Didik pada Materi Pokok Tekanan Zat Melalui Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI). J Banua Sci Educ. 2020;1(1):15-20.

[22] Creswell JW. Reseach Cesign Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pelajar; 2014.

[23] Arikunto S. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta; 2012.

[24] Nahak RL, Bulu VR. Efektivitas model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbantu lembar kerja siswa berbasis saintifik terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. 2020;6(2):230-237.

[25] Ginanjar WS, Utari S, Muslim M. Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA. 2015;20(1):32-37.

[26] Roza J. Penerapan Argument Driven Inquiry Berbantuan Argument Maps untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Mengidentifikasi Level Argumentasi Siswa Ma pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 2017.

[27] Taufiq AU. Pengembangan Tes Kognitif Berbasis Revisi Taksonomi Bloom pada Materi Sistemreproduksi untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biotek. 2015;3(2):1-17.

[28] Muslim. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Argumentasi Dialogis dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika ( JPPPI). 2015;1(2).

[29] Amin M. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi, Penalaran Ilmiah, dan Kognitif Siswa SMA. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 2015.

[30] Herlansyah FA, Fauziah HN. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Time Token Berbantuan Media Audio Visual Terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 2021;2(2):155-167.