Published date: Dec 21 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 5th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 33–46

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i19.12427

Cecilia Titiek Murniatic_murniati@unika.ac.idEnglish Department, Soegijapranata Catholic University, 50234, Indonesia

Heny HartonoEnglish Department, Soegijapranata Catholic University, 50234, Indonesia

Agus Cahyo NugrohoInformation System, Department, Soegijapranata Catholic University, 50234, Indonesia

University lecturers are one among many people who have been affected by the pandemic. Lecturers were forced to use a learning management system, grapple with video conferencing software, and cope with various unpredictable technical issues. In short, external forces seem to pressure lecturers to refine their digital skills and use e-learning as the only way to deliver the materials whenever they were unable to meet face-to-face with students. This study investigates what factors determined lecturers’ intention to use e-learning in their classes. The results of this study suggest that technology literacy and attitude have positive correlations with lecturers’ intention to use e-learning.

Keywords: intention to use e-learning; attitude; self-efficacy; technology; literacy; technology comfort level

[1] P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning (Internet). Framework and resources. Columbus, Ohio: Batelle for Kids; 2019. Available from: https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.

[2] Roblyer M, Doering AH. Integrating educational technology into teaching. USA: Pearson; 2014. 486 p.

[3] Mailizar M, Burg D, Maulina S. Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies. 2021;26:7057–7077.

[4] Buchanan T, Sainter P, Saunders G. Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher education. 2013;25:1–1.

[5] List A. Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education. 2019;138:46–58.

[6] Marsh E. Research anthology on digital transformation, organizational change, and the impact of remote work. Hershey, USA: IGI Global; 2021. Understanding the effect of digital literacy on employees’ digital workplace continuance intentions and individual performance. p. 1638–1659.

[7] Tejedor S, Cervi L, Pérez-Escoda A, Jumbo FT. Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications. 2020;8:48.

[8] Geng S, Law KM, Niu B. Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16:1–22.

[9] Chau KY, Law KM, Tang YM. Impact of self-directed learning and educational technology readiness on synchronous E-learning. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing ( JOEUC). 2021;33:1–20.

[10] Murniati CT, Hartono H, Nugroho AC. Self-directed learning, self-efficacy, and technology readiness in e-learning among university students. KnE Social Sciences. 2022:213–224.

[11] Maldonado UP, Khan GF, Moon J, Rho JJ. Elearning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review. 2011;35:66.

[12]Ø Sørebø, Halvari H, Gulli VF, Kristiansen R. The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education. 2009;53:1177–1187.

[13] Wang Y, Liu X, Zhang Z. An overview of e-learning in China: History, challenges and opportunities. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2018;13:195– 210.

[14] Gagnon M, Legare F, Labrecque M, Fremont P, Cauchon M, Desmartis MA. Perceived barriers to completing an e-learning program on evidence-based medicine. Informatics in Primary Care. 2007;15:83–91.

[15] Wang Y, Liu X, Zhang Z. An overview of e-learning in China: History, challenges and opportunities. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2018;13:195– 210.

[16] Mousavi A, Mohammadi A, Mojtahedzadeh R, Shirazi M, Rashidi H. E-Learning Educational Atmosphere Measure (EEAM): A new instrument for assessing estudents’ perception of educational environment. Research in Learning Technology. 2020;28:2308.

[17] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 2018. 304 p.

[18] Liu M, Navarrete CC, Scordino R, Kang J, Ko Y, Lim M. Examining teachers’ use of iPads: Comfort level, perception, and use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2016;48:159–180.

[19] Unruh T, Peters ML, Willis J. Flip this classroom: A comparative study. Computers in the Schools. 2016;33:38–58.

[20] Abdullah F, Ward R. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;56:238–256.

[21] Al-Rahmi WM, Othman MS, Yusuf LM. Exploring the factors that affect student satisfaction through using e-learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6:299.

[22] Chu RJ, Tsai CC. Self directed learning readiness, Internet self efficacy and preferences towards constructivist Internet based learning environments among higher aged adults. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2009;25:489–501.

[23] Hsia JW, Chang CC, Tseng AH. Effects of individuals’ locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2014;33:51–64.

[24] Saadé RG, Kira D. Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer selfefficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 2009;8:177–191.

[25] Van Dinther M, Dochy F, Segers M. Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review. 2011;6:95–108.

[26] Kisanga D. Determinants of teachers’ attitudes towards e-learning in Tanzanian higher learning institutions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL. 2016;17:109–125.

[27] Cidral WA, Oliveira T, Di Felice M, Aparicio M. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education. 2018;122:273–290.

[28] Pala SM, Basibüyük A. The predictive effect of digital literacy, self-control and motivation on the academic achievement in the science, technology and society learning area. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2021:1–7.

[29] Mohammadyari S, Singh H. Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education. 2015;82:11–25.