Published date: Nov 08 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Science and Technology Research Symposium (SIRES)

Pages: 222–234

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v0i0.12332

Pupung Purnamasaripupung@unisba.ac.idFaculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

Rusman FrendikaFaculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

Lasmanah .Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia

Noor Afza binti AmranTunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia

Mohamad Naimi Mohamad NorTunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia

Mohamad Sharofi IsmailTunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the components of e-government services and corruption in Malaysia and Indonesia. Many efforts have been made by governments of both countries to provide sophisticated e-government platforms and public participations towards the anti-corruption strategy. However, cases of corruption in Indonesia and Malaysia have not shown declining trends. A total of 240 questionnaires were distributed to respondents in Indonesia and Malaysia. Mann-Whitney U was used to compare e-government services and corruption between Indonesia and Malaysia. Interestingly, results reveal that there was a difference in the e-government model between Indonesia and Malaysia settings. In Malaysia, G2G and G2C have a significant effect on corruption, but in Indonesia, G2B and G2C have significant effect with corruption.

Keywords: e-government, government to government (G2G), government to business (G2B), government to citizenship (G2C), anti-corruption.

[1] Nwadinobi EC, Peart A. E-government Development in Nigeria, Bank Verification No (BVN) an. Volume 8. EasyChair; 2018. https://doi.org/10.29007/h2tr.

[2] Park CH, Kim K. E-government as an anti-corruption tool: panel data analysis across countries. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2020;86(4):691–707.

[3] Wu AM, Yan Y, Vyas L. Public sector innovation, e￿government, and anticorruption in China and India: insights from civil servants. Aust J Public Adm. 2020;79(3):370–85.

[4] Abdalla S. Ip-Shing F. Framework for e-government assessment in developing countries: case study from Sudan. Electronic Government, an International Journal. 2012; 9(2):158–177.

[5] Siddique HR, Sharma A, Gupta SC, Murthy RC, Dhawan A, Saxena DK, et al. DNA damage induced by industrial solid waste leachates in Drosophila melanogaster: a mechanistic approach. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Apr;49(3):206–16.

[6] Nadjib A. Corruption Analysis in Religiosity Perspective. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence. 2020;12 no. 2s:2478–89.

[7] Twizeyimana JD, Andersson A. The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Gov Inf Q. 2019;36(2):167–78.

[8] Hamzah N, Mustari MI, Basiron B. Model of Spiritual Education for Children among Successful Women in the Public Sector. Global Journal AlThaqafah. 2015;5(1):105–11.

[9] Sham FM, Yusof S. Religiosity of Muslim Adolescents from Single Parent Families Living in Government-Subsidised Settement. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah. 2015;5(2):1–12.

[10] Cressey D. Other people’s money, dalam: “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99,”. Journal of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. 1953;13:53–81.

[11] Wells JT. Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection. John Wiley & Sons; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119351962.

[12] Yıldız M. Decision-Making Models Used in E-Government Projects: Evidence from Turkey. In: Morçöl G, editor. Handbook of Decision-Making. Marcel Dekker Publications; 2007. pp. 395–416.

[13] Wathne C. Understanding corruption and how to curb it A synthesis of latest thinking. Norway: CMI. CHR. Michelsen Institute: 2021.

[14] Jain AK. Corruption: A Review. J Econ Surv. 2021;15(1):71–121.

[15] Rose-Ackerman S. Political Corruption and Democracy. Conn J Int Law. 1999;14(2).

[16] Fang Z. E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management. 2002;10(2):1- 22.

[17] Sujarweni W. Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press, 2014.

[18] Signore O. Towards a quality model for web sites. CMG Poland Annual Conference; 2005; Warsaw.

[19] Bhatnagar S. Transparency and Corruption: does e-government help? Draft paper prepared for the compilation of CHRI 2003 Report OPEN SESAME: looking for the Right to Information in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative; 2003a. pp. 1–9.

[20] Kim WC, Mauborgne R. Blue Ocean Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business; 2005.

[21] Ramli RM. E-Government Implementation Challenges In Malaysia And South Korea: A Comparative Study. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2017;80(7):1–26.

[22] Abdullah WM, Daud S, Hanapiyah ZM. Improving Human Value through Religiosity and Spirituality in reducing Corruption Risk. 9th International Economics and Business Management Conference - European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Science; 2019; Malaysia.