Published date:Nov 08 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Science and Technology Research Symposium (SIRES)

Pages:157–164

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v0i0.12324

Y. S. Rejekiysr2804@gmail.comIndustrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

E. AchiraeniwatiIndustrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

N. R. As'adIndustrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

M. A. ShakiraIndustrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

V. VedianaIndustrial Engineering Department, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Tea plantation in Neglasari Pangalengan, Bandung, West Java, is a smallholder tea plantation. In the picking process, there are many manual activities, from picking tea shoots to transferring the pickings to transport trucks. The picking process is carried out for 4 hours starting. Most of this time is spent picking the tea shoots. Farmers must carry baskets where empty baskets weigh between 3.6 and 5.1 kg, while 10 - 15 kg is the weight of filled baskets. Manual handling of this material causes various risks to occupational safety and health, loads are often above the workers’ ability limit and they are faced with non-ergonomic work facilities. In the picking process, workers lift weights of more than 5 kg. Workers who lift loads > 5 kg have a 2.3 times higher risk of experiencing low back pain compared to workers who lift loads ≤ 5 kg. Therefore, this study measured occupational risks and recommendations for improvements to minimize the risk of occupational diseases. The method used is the Key Indicator Method-Awkward Body Postures (KIM-ABP). The result from the risk assessment was 268 where a score greater than 100 indicates high risk and the need for improvements in the workplace.

Keywords: manual handling, work risk, Key Indicator Method, KIM-ABP

[1] Deros BM, Daruis DD, Basir IM. A Study on Ergonomic Awareness among Workers Performing Manual Material Handling Activities. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;195:1666–73.

[2] Rejeki YS, As’ad NR, Achiraeniwati E. Improvement of work system with ergonomic approach of domestic shoe industry in Cibaduyut Bandung. Appl Mech Mater. 2014;606:247–51.

[3] Rejeki YS, Achiraeniwati E, As’ad NR, Hadiid N. The design of manual packaging work station based on workers’ dimension in beverage industry. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng. 2020;830(4).

[4] Yarmohammadi, Hamed., Ziaei, Mansour., Poursadeghiyan, Mohsen., Moradi, Mysam., Fathi, Bahram., Ebraihimi MH. Evaluation of occupational Risk Assessment. pdf. Res J Med Sci. 2016;10(3):116–9.

[5] Naeini, Hassan Sadeghi., Karuppiah, Karmegam., Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri., Dalal K. Ergonomics in agriculture: An Approach in Prevention of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) Hassan Sadeghi Naeini 1 , Karmegam Karuppiah 2 , Shamsul Bahri Tamrin 2 and Koustuv Dalal 3. J Agric Environ Sci [Internet]. 2014;3(2):33–51. Available from: https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Koustuv_Dalal/publication/267151361_Prevention_of_Workrelated_ Musculoskeletal_Disorders_WMSDs_in_Agriculture/links/ 54d9fd990cf24647581ff9f9/Prevention-of-Work-related-Musculoskeletal- Disorders-WMSDs-in-Agriculture.pdf

[6] Syuhada AD, Suwondo A, Setyaningsih Y. Faktor Risiko Low Back Pain pada Pekerja Pemetik Teh di Perkebunan Teh Ciater Kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2018;13(1):91–100.

[7] Singh S, Arora R. Ergonomic Intervention for Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders among Farm Women. J Agric Sci. 2010;1(2):61–71.

[8] Klussmann A, Liebers F, Brandstädt F, Schust M, Serafin P, Schäfer A, et al. Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug;7(8):15412.

[9] Mousavian Asl Z.1 MSc BPA. P. Ergonomic Evaluation of Occupational Tasks in a Sofa Making Workshop Based on KIM and Presentation of Corrective Actions. Int J Musculoskelet Pain Prev . 2018;3(1)(1):1–5.

[10] Klussmann A, Liebers F, Gebhardt H, Rieger MA, Latza U, Steinberg U. Risk assessment of manual handling operations at work with the key indicator method (KIM-MHO) — determination of criterion validity regarding the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and clinical conditions within a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):1–13.

[11] Klussmann A, Steinberg U, Liebers F, Gebhardt H, Rieger MA. The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(1):1–8.

[12] Klussmann A, Liebers F, Brandstädt F, Schust M, Serafin P, Schäfer A, et al. Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug;7(8):15412.