Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 517–524

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12126

Abustan .cakbus.community@gmail.comIslamic University of Jakarta (UID), Indonesia

Farhana .Islamic University of Jakarta (UID), Indonesia

Hamdan Azhar SiregarIslamic University of Jakarta (UID), Indonesia

Otonom MustomiIslamic University of Jakarta (UID), Indonesia

In the development of a world that is experiencing the intensity of technological disruption, which has actually broken down the boundaries of space and time, and has ceased various developments in the order of daily life. This confirms the need for a clear mindset that every development or dynamic of technology in the industrial era 4.0 is like a double-edged sword. In a sense, positive and negative impacts. The technological progress of philosophy responds back, that is, one way of doing philosophy in the midst of increasingly powerful industrial technological advances. At that point, it becomes a challenge for philosophy to carry out its function as a critic and as a contributor of constructive direction. The struggle of the 21st century is the progression of industrial technology; therefore, this reality is interesting to study/examine in such a way through a comparative approach, a reflective approach in photographing and articulating sharply “artificial intelligence” technology. The double face of the impact of technological disruption will ultimately remind us that “humans” will be the main determinant of all matters of life on this earth.

Keywords: philosophy challenge, era of disruption, 21st century

[1] . Murtiningsih S. Artificial intelligence and humanity. Kompas Artic; 2022.

[2] Ellitan L. “Competing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0.” J. Maksipreneur Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrep. 2020 Dec;10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i1.657

[3] Abustan. Critical and contextual human rights issues. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2021.

[4] . Makin. “Important aspects of building in the village”. ILREJ J. 2022;2(1):36.

[5] Luwarso L. “Challenges in the era of global diversity and pluralism” Science. 2016;(80-.).

[6] . Hidayat K. The social role of religion. For the Benefit of the Nation; 2016.

[7] Ali F. “Time and people.” The Benefit of the Nation, 2016.

[8] Sari JM, Purwanta E. “The implementation of artificial intelligence in STEM-based creative learning in the society 5.0 Era.” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb. 2021 Dec; 6(2): 433–440. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.10135

[9] . Latif Y. Pancasila in the Era of Disruption. Kompas Article; 2022.

[10] . Reskiantio Pabubung M. EPISTEMOLOGI KECERDASAN BUATAN (AI) DAN PENTINGNYA ILMU ETIKA DALAM PENDIDIKAN INTERDISIPLINER. J. Filsafat Indones. 2021 Sep;4(2):152–9.