Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 202–218

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12091

Natasya Yunita Sugiastutinatasya.yunitasugiastuti@trisakti.ac.idFaculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, West Jakarta, Indonesia

As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, large debtors experienced performance failures so that the President of the Republic of Indonesia designated Covid-19 as a non-natural disaster and a national disaster in Presidential Decree (Keppres) No.12/2020. The Civil Code has provided rules to anticipate failure to contractual obligations caused by circumstances beyond the parties’ ability through measures of defense against non-performance on the grounds of force majeure. The problem lies in whether the parties impeded in carrying out contractual obligations can use Presidential Decree No.12/2020 as a cause for force majeure. This study examines whether Presidential Decree No. 12/2020 meets the criteria for force majeure as regulated in the Civil Code. This research is normative legal research examining the legal norms regarding force majeure regulated in Articles 1244 and 1245 of the Civil Code. The researcher deployed legislation as primary legal material and legal doctrine as secondary legal material. Data were obtained through literature studies incorporating electronic textbooks attained through the google scholar search engine. The data were analyzed qualitatively, and conclusions were drawn based on deductive reasoning. The results indicated that Presidential Decree No.12/2020 is a fact that does not require proving. However, the event of force majeure alone is an inadequate cause for non-performance; instead, causality between the force majeure and the failure to perform must be proved. Similarly, it also needs to be confirmed that the debtor acts in good faith. In concrete cases, judges have the authority to perform the primary function of good faith by either suspending the performance of contractual obligations or terminating contractual relations and determining the responsibility of bearing the risks caused by force majeure.

Keywords: force majeure, suspend, terminate the contract, Indonesia

[1] Budiwati S. “The 2019 National Seminar on Transcendental Law,” 2019.

[2] Situmorang M. The Power of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle in Arbitration Agreement. De Jure (Durban). 2021;21(4):448.

[3] Utama IG. Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Ganesha Civ. Educ. J. 2019;1(1):43.

[4] Jamil NK. Implikasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Keadaan Memaksan (Force Majeure) Dalam Hukum Perjajian Indonesia. Kertha Semaya. 2020;8(7):1048.

[5] Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian. 1st ed. Jakarta: PT Intermasa; 2010.

[6] Isnaeni M. Hukum Harta Kekayaan Episentrum Burgerlijk Wetboke (BW). Surabaya: CV Revka Prima Media; 2020.

[7] Soemadipradja RS. Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Keadaan Memaksa. Jakarta: National Legal Reform Program; 2010.

[8] Kharisma DB. “Pandemi Covid-19 Apakah Force Majeure?” RechtsVindingOnline, p. 1, 2020.

[9] NyHart JD. The role of law in economic development. London: Forgotten Books; 2017.

[10] Theberge LJ. “Law and economic development.” Journal of International Law and Policy. 2020;9(2): 232, 233, 237.

[11] Gunadi A, Nurcahyawan T, Aprilia IS. Pengantar Hukum Arbitrase dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Cirebon: Guepedia; 2021.

[12] Khairandy R. Itikad Baik Dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia; 2003.

[13] Indri Hapsari DR. Kontrak dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam. Repertorium; 2014. p. 85.

[14] Diantha IM. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group; 2017.

[15] Nurul Qamar HM. Aan Aswari, Hardianto Djanggih, Muhammad Syarif, Dachran S. Busthami, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Method), 1st ed. Makassar: CV Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2017.

[16] Soekanto S, Mamudji S. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. 17th ed. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 2015.

[17] Cohen ML, Olson KC. Legal Research in A Nutshell. 14th ed. United States of America: West Academic Publishing; 2021.

[18] Hanson S. Legal Method & Reasoning. 2nd ed. United States of America: Cavendish Publishing Limited; 2013.

[19] “Putusan Nomor 288/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst.” pp. 2–3, 5–7, 12, 2020.

[20] Yogahastama R, Fajar MI. “Implikasi Penetapan Darurat Masa Covid-19 Sebagai Keadaan Force Majeure Pada Perjanjian Sektor Pariwisata.” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan. 2020;5(2):408.

[21] Budiono H. Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia: Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2006.

[22] Irayadi M. Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Hermeneutika. 2021;5(1):99.

[23] Badrulzaman MD. Aneka Hukum Bisnis. Bandung: Alumni; 2014.

[24] Sinaga NA. Peranan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian. M-Progress. 2021;8(1):62.

[25] Hasanah I, Ramadhani DA. Pemenuhan Hak Pekerja Setelah Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dimasa Sebelum Dan Pada Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Gorontalo Law Rev. 2021;4(1):24.

[26] Yasin M. “Penting !!! Inilah Putusan-Putusan PHK Akibat Force Majeur,” Hukumonline. com, 2020.

[27] Anwar AS. Kebijkan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Prespektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Supremasi Huk. 2020;9(2):26.

[28] Syaifuddin M. Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak Dalam perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju; 2012.

[29] Ridwan M, Nurhakim LI. Optimalisasi Perundingan Bipatrit Sebagai Master Mind Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Phk) Sebagai Akibat Dari Pandemi Corona. ADHAPER. 2020;6(1):104.

[30] Khairandy R. Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Di Berbagai Sistem Hukum. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press; 2017.

[31] Arifin M. “Membangun Konsep Ideal Penerapan Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Hukum Perjanjian.” Ius Const. 20205(1):75, 76, 2020. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2119..

[32] Putusan Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mrt. Muara Tebo; 2021. p. 32.

[33] Azikin Z. Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group; 2015.

[34] Sufiarina, Wahyuni S; Sufiarina and S. Wahyuni. Force Majeure Dan Notoir Feiten atas Kebijakan PSBB Covid-19. J. Huk. Sasana. 2020;6(1):8.

[35] Dewangker AE. Penggunaan Klausula Force Majeure Dalam Kondisi Pandemik. J. Educ. Dev. 2020;8(3):310.

[36] Syaifuddin M. Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktek Hukum. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju; 2012.

[37] Susamto B. Prinsip Syariah Dalam Pembaharuan Konsep Perkoperasian Di Indonesia. Khairun. 2018;2(1):26.

[38] Selajar S, Bachri R, Nabila. “Modal Penyertaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Koperasi Panca Prima Terhadap Wanprestasi yang Dilakukan”. Khairun. 2018;2(1):26.

[39] Isnaeni M. Selintas Pintas Hukum Perikatan (Bagian Umum). Surabaya: PT Revka Petra Media; 2017.

[40] Bambang Eko Muljono DNS. Keabsahan Force Majeure Dalam Perjanjian Di Masa Era Pandemi Covid-1. Humaniora. 2020;4(2):260.