Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 90–100

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12076

Tinuk Dwi Cahyanitinuk@umm.ac.idUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Wahyudi KurniawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Sholahuddin Al-FatihUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

The abuse of power during the Covid-19 pandemic was felt to be very massive by the governmentbecause the health sector received far more attention than others. The Covid-19 test was made mandatory to travel in spite of it being very expensive for the community, and various news spread in the community made suspicion of abuse of power. By using qualitative methods and Nvivo 12 Plus to map the data, this research was conducted to determine whether the abuse of power actually occurred. The results of the study show that the cases that occur are too subjective to be considered an abuse of power, in this case, the government and corporations are also working according to the needs of the community to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic. However, to see the disadvantages of this, the author feels that further research is still needed regarding the urgency of the Covid-19 test while traveling and its impact on state budget losses.

Keywords: abuse of power, pandemic, Covid-19 test, corporations

[1] Seregig IK, Hartono B, Waskito B. Impact of corona virus on criminal action and prevention measures in Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal. 2020;3(2):117–125.

[2] Simanjuntak EY, Octavia YT, Sinaga J. Optimalisasi Pencegahan Melalui Deteksi Dini Penularan Covid-19 Menggunakan Genose C19. JUKESHUM Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. 2021;1(2):101–106.

[3] Simanjuntak EY, Octavia YT, Sinaga J. Optimalisasi Pencegahan Melalui Deteksi Dini Penularan Covid-19 Menggunakan Genose C19′. JUKESHUM Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. 2021;1(2):101–106.

[4] Mulkan H. Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan dalam Kondisi Darurat Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi. 2021;21(2):685.

[5] Esfandiari F, Al Fatih S. Initiating a permanent electoral body to resolve dignified election disputes: Assessing the effectiveness of Gakkumdu. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum. 2020;9(3):333.

[6] Miles J, Huberman MB, Saldana AM. Qualitative data analysis. 3rd ed. Los Angles: Arizona State University; 2014.

[7] Lele G. Revisiting the virtues of veto point: Political corruption in post-Soeharto Indonesia. Journal of Legislative Studies. 2020;26(2):275–294.

[8] Nelson FM, Santoso T. Plea bargaining in corruption cases: A solution for the recovery of financial losses by Indonesia? Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 2020;28(2):1233–1248.

[9] Widyawati A. Assistance and establishment of an anti-corruption legal clinic in Puguh Village, Boja District, Kendal Regency. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum. 2021 Aug;1(2):164–177.

[10] Indrawati S, Rachmawati AF. Efektivitas Pendayagunaan Zakat Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 dalam Upaya Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Indonesia Law Reform Journal. 2022 Apr;2(1):81–89.

[11] Adji OS. Undan∼Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan. 1983;13(6):475.