Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 57–74

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12074

Renti Maharini Kertirenti.m@trisakti.ac.idTrisaksti University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Arif WicaksanaTrisaksti University, Jakarta, Indonesia

The state guarantees the right of every citizen to get a decent living and a place to live as a human being. Consumer rights in the housing sector are regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 1 of 2011 concerning Housing and Settlement Areas, and Law Number 20 of 2011 concerning Flats. Consumer rights are the obligation of business actors to fulfill. Bankruptcy is an effort for creditors to fulfill their rights to debtors. In principle, consumers in the housing sector do not want developers to go bankrupt, but on the contrary, bankruptcy is used as a loophole for irresponsible developers to avoid their obligations. The consumer’s position becomes a questionable matter because the consumer’s position is harmed by the bankruptcy decision. In this paper, we will discuss on how is the position of consumers in the housing sector as a result of the bankruptcy decision of the developer and the efforts to fulfill the rights of housing consumers fairly. The research method used is normative with an approach to norms and principles in regulation. The data used is secondary with qualitative data analysis and deductive conclusions. The purpose of this paper is to explain the position of housing consumers on the developer’s bankruptcy decision, and efforts to fulfill consumer rights due to the developer’s bankruptcy decision. The developer’s bankruptcy decision has resulted in housing consumers being concurrent creditors. Efforts that can be taken to fulfill consumer rights are to position consumers as creditors with special rights because of the law based on the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016 and the Decision of the Constitutional Court 21 of 2015, in addition to efforts to file a lawsuit to the district court as well as amendments to bankruptcy regulations and consumer protection.

Keywords: bankruptcy, housing, consumer protection

[1] Gilberts J. Land rights as human rights: The case for specific right to land. Int J Hum Rights. 2013;10(18):115–29.

[2] Rahmani SR, Octarina NF. Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah/Rumah Susun sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Penjual dan Pembeli. J. Supremasi. 2020 Apr;10(1):36–46.

[3] Zainul, “Usai PT Pelangi Putra Mandiri Pailit, 35 Warga Perumahan Pelangi Metro Residence Terus Berjuang,” Tribun News. .

[4] K. News, “20 Pembeli Unit Apartemen Antasari 45 Gugat UU Kepailitan ke MK.” .

[5] “PKPU Green Pramuka City yang Dipaksakan (Dugaan Adanya Persengkokolan Jahat),” News 11 Paper. .

[6] Ramadewi Fika MR. Settlement of Debts to Creditors through Bankruptcy. Universitas Diponegoro; 2007.

[7] Febryka LN. “Position of consumers in bankruptcy,” Negara Huk. 2017; 8(2).

[8] Mansyur MA, Salim R. “Legal analysis of dispute settlement of bankrupt business actors based on the Consumer Protection Act,” Pembaharuan Huk. 2014; 1(1).

[9] Anggraeny I. Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Wanprestasi. LEGA LATA J. Ilmu Huk. 2020 Jan;5(1):57–66.

[10] Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. .

[11] Soekanto S. Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press; 1986.

[12] Marzuki PM. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Panamedia; 2014.

[13] “Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU.”

[14] Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Peseroan Terbatas. .

[15] Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria. .

[16] Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman. .

[17] “Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun.”

[18] “Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan berserta Benda- Benda yang berkaitan dengan Tanah.”

[19] Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. 1918.

[20] I. Anggraeny, “LEGAL REVIEW OF SELLING LAND OF INHERITANCE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF ALL HEIRS,” Leg. J. Ilm. Huk., 2020. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v28i1.11817.

[21] Elena M. “AJB Belum Keluar Meski Sudah Lama Menghuni, Kenapa?” .

[22] Shiddiq M. “Perkara Warga Violet Garden Bekasi vs Pengembang dan Bank Bergulir di Pengadilan,” Gres News. .

[23] Rahardjo S. Legal Science. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

[24] Sjahdeni SR. Bankruptcy Law-Understanding Faillissement Verordening Juncto Law No. 4 of 1998. Bandung: Pustaka Utama Grafiti; 2002.

[25] Hidayah NP, Anggraeny I, Hapsari DR. “Credit Dispute Resolution with Mortgage Right Warranties on Conventional Banking,” vol. 121, no. Inclar. 2020;2019:24–8.

[26] Sutedi A. Transition of land rights and its registration. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2010.

[27] Subekti and Tjitrosidibio. Code of Civil Law. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita; 1981.

[28] Djojodirdjo MM. Acts against the Law. Yogyakarta: Pradnya Paramita; 1982.

[29] Friedman JP. Dictionary of Business Terms. Unites States of America: Baron’s Edicational Services Inc., 2003.

[30] Dwithia ZFH. “Penyuluhan Hukum Masyarakat tentang Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli,”. J. Dedik. Huk. 2021 Aug;1(2):135–43.