Published date: May 20 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 33–48

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i9.10926

Muh. Syarif Ahmadsyarif_ahmad57@yahoo.comPoliteknik STIA-LAN Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Aulia RahmanPoliteknik STIA-LAN Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Border areas and new expansion areas are both often undeveloped areas, with limited facilities and infrastructure, far from urban centers or government, and with high inequality and poor availability of public services. In 2019, Sipelandukilat won the Top 45 Innovation award from the Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (KEMENPANRB). The purpose of this study was to describe the Sipelandukilat service innovations and identify the supporting and inhibiting factors of this innovation program. Descriptive qualitative methods were used, with data source triangulation. The results demonstrated that the implementation of the Sipelandukilat innovation program has gone well, although improvements are needed, especially for areas that have limited internet networks. There were eight factors driving the development of the Sipelandukilat innovations, but financial and demographic factors were the most important. Meanwhile, there were two factors that hindered the innovations, namely the risk aversion cultural factor and the inability to deal with risk and change.

Keywords: new expansion areas, innovation attributes, supporting and inhibiting factors of innovation.

[1] Ali MH, Mawar S and Syah Nurdin. Dampak pemekaran daerah pada pelayanan publik di tinjau menurut sistem hukum Indonesia. Journal Petita. Vol. 3 No. 2, 2018.

[2] Tenrini R. Pemekaran daerah: Kebutuhan atau euforia demokrasi? Mengapa harus mekar. Pusat Kebijakan APBN BKF Republik Indonesia; 2014.

[3] Thenint H. Mini Study 10 Innovation in The Public Sector. INNO GRIPS (Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies). Manchester, UK. 2010.

[4] Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Report on the results of the ombudsman initiative. Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta. 2017.

[5] Niaga Asia. “Sipelandukilat” antar kalimantan utara masuk jajaran 45 top inovasi. Niaga Asia: Media Ekonomi dan Bisnis; 2019.

[6] Sudiar S. Pembangunan pada wilayah perbatasan negara: Sebuah gambaran tentang strategi dalam pengelolaan kawasan perbatasan darat di provinsi kalimantan utara. Journal Aministrative Reform ( JAR), Vol 3, No 4 (2015).

[7] Hayat. Manajemen pelayanan publik. Jakarta ; Rajawali Pers. 2017.

[8] Suwarno Y. Inovasi pada sektor publik. Jakarta : STIA-LAN Press; 2008.

[9] Rahmawati R, and Suryawati E. Inovasi pelayanan akta kelahiran anak oleh dinas kependudukan dan pencatatan sipil (Dispendukcapil) di kota Surakarta. Jurnal Wacana Publik. Vol. 1, No. 1, 2021. Page 49-61.

[10] Sugiyono. Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta; 2013.

[11] Moleong, L J. Metodologi untuk penelitian kualitatif. Badung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset; 2010.

[12] Narsa NP. Inovasi pelayanan: Telaah literatur perbandingan sektor privat dan sektor publik. Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018: 46-62.

[13] Kurniawan RC. Tantangan kualitas pelayanan publik pada pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016.

[14] Maulana D, Yulianti RY. Pentingnya inovasi pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Prosiding KNIA 2018 strategi administrasi pembangunan dalam merespon revolusi industri 4.0. Bandung : STIA LAN Bandung. 2018.

[15] Pratama R. Inovasi pelayanan publik (Studi deskriptif tentang nilai tambah (Value added) inovasi pelayanan perizinan bagi masyarakat di kota kediri). Jurnal Kebijakan. dan Manajemen Publik. Vol. 1, No. 2. 2013.