Published date:Mar 10 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences

Pages:110–119

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i4.10519

Fithriyah Inda Nur Abidafithriyahabida@unesa.ac.idEnglish Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

Ali Mustofa English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

This paper attempts to investigate a sexual selection-based argument about the significance of humor in courtship. The huge range of Dickensian sexual humor suggests that the extroversion of female characters is associated with their inferior position. Females were formerly under-represented in producing humor. Jokes and humorous acts were primarily associated with males, particularly in the domain of sexual humor. Dickens’ use of sexual humor is evidence for the critic and becomes a valuable tool for revealing gender stereotypes in the 19

[1] Martin RA, Ford T. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach.
[2] Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
[3] Raskin V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
[4] Gaskell P. (1972) The manufacturing population of England. Its moral, social and physical conditions. New York: Amo Publisher.
[5] Foucault M. (1998). The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.
[6] Nead L. (1998). Myths of sexuality: Representations of women in Victorian Britain.
[7] London: Blackwell.
[8] G Greengross, Paul Silvia, Emily Nusbaum. (2020). Sex differences in humor production ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 84 no 2. Pp 40-45.
[9] Goldman L. (2002). Science, perform, and politics in Victorian Britain.
[10] United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Marvasti AB. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
[12] Attardo S. (1998). Trends in European humor research: Towards a text model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.Vol.1 no 4. pp 349-369.
[13] Attardo S. (2003). The pragmatics of humor. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 35 no 9, pp 1287-1450.
[14] Carrell A. (1997). Joke competence and humor competence. Humor Journal. Vol.10 No 1, pp 173-85.
[15] Fine GA. (1984). Humorous interaction and the social construction of meaning: Making sense in a jocular vein. Studies in Symbolic Interaction. Vol 5 no 1, pp 83-101.
[16] Norrick NR. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk.
[17] Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[18] H, Burrel. (1989). The sexuality of organization. London: Sage Publication.
[19] Spradley JP, Mann BJ. (1975). The cocktail waitress: Woman’s work in a man’s world. New York: John Wiley.
[20] Bartky S-L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
[21] Cameron D, Frazer E. (2000). Feminism and pornography. On the question of pornography and sexual violence: Moving beyond cause and effect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dickens C. (1839). Nicholas Nickeleby. London: Chapman and Hall.
[22] Dickens C. (1839). Oliver Twist. London: Bentley’s Miscellany.
[23] Dickens C. (1850). David Copperfield. London: Bradbury and Evans.
[24] Bown A. (2014). Eventual laughter: Dickens and comedy [Doctoral Degree Disertation]. University of Manchester.