Published date: Mar 10 2020

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The 2018 International Conference on Logistics and Business Innovation (ICLBI)

Pages: 143–150

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v5i3.6568

Khristian Edi Nugroho SoebandrijaKnugroho@binus.eduIndustrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Program of Doctor of Research in Management (DRM). Bina Nusantara University, Jl. K H. Syahdan No. 9, Kemanggisan – Palmerah, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480

Business innovation is one of the factors driving a company for providing values for stakeholders toward sustainable competitive advantages. The mentioned values vis-à- vis not merely internal stakeholders, but also external stakeholders. Subsequently, this paper elaborates grand theory within stakeholders theory. The mentioned sustainable competitive advantages are achieved through the disruptive innovation that revamps the constellation of sustainable competitive advantages. The disruptive innovation is implemented and intertwined through industry 4.0 that covers trilogy of physical, digital, and biology. Subsequently, the mentioned implementation is geared toward benefits of Making Indonesia 4.0 through Indonesia local wisdom and setting. Precisely, it further elaborates the Product Design Engineering (PDE). This PDE discipline incorporates the concept of its evolutionary theories from cognitive psychology; human factors in product design; Kansei engineering; emotional design; affective engineering; and user experience design.

Keywords: affective engineering; cognitive psychology; disruptive innovation; Kansei engineering; user empathy

[1] Rong D, Ming X, Limsupanark J. The theoretical study and empirical research process of service innovation: a literature review. International Business Research, 2015; 8(1). http://www.ccsenet.org/ journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/38694

[2] Schumpeter JA.The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; 2017. pp. 3–57. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GB8xDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+theory+of+economic+development&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiDlZPk3NrlAhVOXSsKHTHDB4YQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=the%20theory%20of% 20economic%20development&f=false

[3] Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 1992;13(S1):111–125. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/smj.4250131009

[4] Sok P, O’Cass A. Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration–exploitation: the critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources. Journal of Service Marketing 2015; 29(2):137–149. https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/JSM-03-2014-0085

[5] Gustafsson A, Kristensson P, Schirr GR, Witell L. Service innovation. Business Expert Press, New York; 2016. pp. 150–169

[6] Lee YD, Chen SH, Kuo JH. Exploring the intellectual structure of organizational learning studies. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Management Sciences, 2014; 2(2):76–83. http://tweb.cjcu.edu.tw/journal_abstract/2015_01_15_04_48_52.976.pdf

[7] Bongard-Blanchy K, Bouchard C. Dimensions of user experience - from the product design perspective. Journal interaction Personne-Système, Association Francophone interaction Homme- Machine (AFIHM), 2014, 3 (1), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 278828656_Dimensions_of_User_Experience_-_from_the_Product_Design_Perspective

[8] Choi MW. A study on the application of user experience to ICT-based advertising. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2018; 120 (6). https://acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-120-6/issue4.html

[9] Pikas, E., Oehmen, J., Koskela, L., & Thuesen, C. A new framework for construction project definition stage. 2018. In DS92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. DESIGN METHODS. Marjanović D, Štorga M, Škec S, Bojčetić N, Pavković N (Eds.). pp. 1301–1312. https://orbit. dtu.dk/files/149481728/Contribution542_final_A.pdf

[10] Norman DA. The design of everyday things. Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books, New York; 2013. Pp. 1–347. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17290807-the-design-of-everyday-things

[11] Golightly D, Sharples S, Patel H, Ratchev S. Manufacturing in the cloud: A human factors perspective. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2016; 55:12–21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0169814116300464

[12] Tomico O, Mizutani N, Levy P, Takahiro Y, Cho Y. Kansei physiological measurements and constructivist psychological explorations for approaching user subjective experience during and after product usage. In: The 10th International Design Conference. DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008. Marjanovic D, Storage M, Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N (Eds.). pp. 529–536. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230561428_Kansei_physiological_measurements_and_constructivist_psychological_explorations_for_approaching_user_subjective_experience

[13] Norman DA. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, USA; 2004. p. 161. https://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Design-Love-Everyday Things/dp/0465051367

[14] Salvia G, Rognoli V, Malvoni E, Levi M. The objectivity of users’ emotional experience with textiles biological and mechanical tests for the prediction of the sensorial profile of fabrics. In: Seventh International Conference on Design and Emotion 2010. pp. 1–12. https://zenodo.org/record/2596735

[15] Hassenzahl M. User experience: A research agenda. In: Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Soegaard M, Dam RF (Eds.). The Interaction Design Foundation, Denmark; 2011. pp 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259823352_User_Experience_and_Experience_Design