Published date: Nov 25 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”

Pages: 448–457

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i14.5632

E V Pismennayapismennaya.elena@bk.ruDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

V A StukaloDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

I A VoltersDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

M Yu AzarovaDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

V M PerederievaDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

V I FaizovaDepartment of agrobiology and land resources, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russia

Natural resources potential of the territory and natural-historical mechanism of its development are pacing factors in agriculture differentiation and AIC-development. Key branches in the Stavropol Territory are crop production, sheep breeding and meat and milk cattle breeding. To meet the market demands “equating” differentiation of agricultural enterprises is implemented. Thus, in Stavropol Territory crop lands have been increased for crops required in the market that disbalanced the crop rotation, disturbed agro technologies and resulted in reduction in yields and grain quality. In the Territory 70 % of tillage is in risky agriculture. About 65 % of crop production (wheat, barley and others) are in draughty areas where out of 141 years (1861–2002) 41 % draughty, which determine high natural-climatic dependence of grain economy [1]. Annual and areal variability of grain production is also determined by topsoil heterogeneity and variety of relief. At present production of the basic market crop – winter wheat, which takes 75 % of acreage for cereals and leguminous crops, the productivity of the cultivated crop is 22.4–39.5 centner/hectare. It results in top soil changes such as compaction, fertilizer impoverishment and organic matter content (organic matter deficit is 400–700 kg/ha). Intensification of agrarian production results in quicker erosion processes, soil properties decline and lower fertility. The total area of eroded lands in the Territory is 1792000 ha [2]. That is why it is important to develop a new model of the economic use of Stavropol Territory. The main methods of study are analysis of the current status and organization of the agricultural zones of the Territory. The data were preceded with the software Statistica.

[1] Pehchukov, V.M., Dorozhko, G.R. (2005). Basics of agriculture in Stavropol. Stavropol: AGRUS.

[2] R'abov, I.E (2001). Influence of unfavorable weather conditions on the harvest and land resources in the Stavropol territory. Stavropol: Stavropol Publishing House.

[3] Zhuchenko, A.A., Trukhachev, V.V. Agriculture systems. Stavropol: AGRUS.

[4] Komov, N.V. (2004). Land use planning in land management: Agricultural regulation and land cadaster, 215 p.

[5] Khlystun, V.N. (2016). Effective land use as a successful factor of import substitution agriculture and processing enterprises economics, pp. 58–61.

[6] Pismennaya, E.V., Loshakov, A.V., Odinsov, S.V., Stukalo, V.A. Improving Model of Territorial Organization of Agricultural Land Tenure. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences no. 7(6), pp. 1783–1787.

[7] Kashtanov, A.N. (1983). Agriculture sustainability: ways of improving. Moscow: Knowledge.

[8] Kalchenco, S., Yeremenko, D., Hrybova, D. (2018). Features of the use of resource potential in peasant farms. Baltic Journal of economic studies, no. 4(4), pp. 140–144.

[9] Voronin, B.A., Chupina, I.P., Sharapova, V.M. et al. (2017). Theoretical aspects of national food security provision issue. Turkish online journal of design art and communication, no. 7, pp. 2102–2108.

[10] Shulga, O. (2017). Patterns of development of relations of land ownership in the agrarian sector of the economy. Baltic Journal of economic studies, no. 3(4), pp. 307–318.

[11] Danilov-Danilian, V.I., Zalikhanov, M.Ch., Losev, K.S. (2007). Environmental safety. Common principles and Russian Aspect. Moscow: IICIA BIMPA.

[12] Rumina, E.V. (2000). Analysis of ecological-economical interactions. Moscow: Nauka.

[13] Zhuchenko, A.A. (2004). Resource potential for grain production in Russia (theory and practice). Moscow: LLC ``Izdatel'stvo Agrorus''.

[14] Dudych, H., Dudych, L. (2018). Assessment of the ecological sustainability of agricultural land use in the territorial structure of region. Scientific papers-series management economic engineering in agriculture and rural development, no. 18(4), pp. 87–92.

[15] Podkovyrova, M., Kucherov, D., Ivanenko, V. (2019). Development of a Territorial Model of Agricultural Land Use on a Landscape-Ecological Basis. International journal of advanced biotechnology and research, no. 10(1), pp. 407–410.

[16] Sokolov, O.A. (2000). Agroecology. Moscow: RSAU.

[17] Wilson, C.O., Liang, B.R., Shannon, J. (2019). Projecting future land use/land cover by integrating drivers and plan prescriptions: the case for watershed applications. Giscience & remote sensing, no. 56(4), pp. 511–535.

[18] Zhuchenko, A.A. (2004). Resource potential of grain production in Russia (theory and practice). Moscow: LLC ``Izdatel'stvo Agrorus''.

[19] Kirushin, V.I. (2010). Ecological sustainability of agricultural landscapes Issues of bioresources sustainability: theory and practice. Orenburg: Publishing House OSAU, pp. 6–14.