Published date: Nov 25 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”

Pages: 433–439

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i14.5630

Ekaterina Klimovalaulilitik@yandex.ruState Agricultural Academy, Russia

Manya MkrtchyanSt. Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine, Russia

Tatyana BabintsevaState Agricultural Academy, Russia

Alexandra ReshetnikovaState Agricultural Academy, Russia

The purpose of the research was to determine and comparatively analyze the degree of distribution of eimeria species in the northern, central and southern zones of Udmurtia and to identify various associations of these protozoa in farms. The studies of animals of black-motley, Holstein and holsteined black-motley breeds of animals aged 1–16 months, as well as heifers and cows in three zones of the Udmurt Republic showed that eimeriosis is recorded in all experimental farms regardless of the technology of keeping and breed of animals. In order to determine the species of eimeria, the method of oocysts culturing in a thermostat at 25–28 ∘C in a 2% solution of potassium dichromate was used [5]. The results of our studies showed that eight species of bovine eimeria are recorded in animals from the farms of the Udmurt Republic. In the farm located in the central region, the maximum prevalence rate was noted and the clinical signs of eimeriosis are most manifested, up to the death. In our opinion, this is due both to the high prevalence rates, a high percentage of infestation with the most pathogenic species, such as E.zuernii and E. bovis, and mixed infections, the most common of which are the following: E.zuernii + E.bovis; E.zuernii + E.bovis + E.ellipsoidalis; E.zuernii + E.bovis + E.bukidnonensis; E.zuernii + E.bovis+E.subspherica; E.zuernii + E.bovis + E.ellipsoidalis + E.auburnensis; E.zuernii + E.bovis + E.ellipsoidalis + E.auburnensis + E.bukidnonensis + E.subspherica + E.brasiliensis + E.alabamensis.

[1] Andrushko, E.A., Egorov, S.V. (2015). Epizootic monitoring of eimeriosis of young cattle in the farms of Ivanovo and adjacent areas. Rossiyskiyparazitologicheskiyzhurnal, no. 2. Moscow, pp. 27–31.

[2] Ismailov, M. (2012). Age and seasonal dynamics of eimerioticnfection in cattle of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan. Veterinariya, no. 2. pp. 36–38.

[3] Kalinina, E.S., Mkrtchyan, M.E., Sharafislamova, M.B. (2011). Helminthic-protozoan infections of cattle in farms of the Udmurt Republic. VestnikIzhevskoy SAA, vol. 3(28), pp. 30–33.

[4] Klimova, E.S. (2013). Helminthoses of heifers of random age at Study Farm of Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy. Agrarnayanauka -- innovatsionnomurazvitiyu APK v sovremennykhusloviyakh: in Proceedings of All-Russian. Scientific-practical conf. Izhevsk, vol. 3, pp. 27–31.

[5] Krylov, M.V. (1996). Key to parasitic protozoa (human, domestic animals and agricultural plants). St. Petersburg: Zoological Institute RAS, 602 p.

[6] Kushnir, Yu.O. (2011). The comparative effectiveness of laboratory methods for the diagnosis of eimeriosis in cattle. Teoriya i praktikabor'by s parazitarnymiboleznyami, no. 12. Moscow,pp.265–267.

[7] Lochkarev, V.A. (2000). Bovine emeriosis. Veterinariya.no. 3, pp. 33–34.

[8] Lutfullin, M.Kh. Latypov, D.G., Cornishina, M.D. (2007). Veterinary helminthology. Kazan: IdelPressPublishing House.

[9] Mironenko, V.M., Yatusevich, A.I. (2000). The problem of eimeriosis in cattle in the Republic of Belarus. Proceedings of International scientific and practical conf. ``Aktual'nyyeproblemypatologiisel'skokhozyaystvennykhzhivotnykh''. Minsk, pp. 390–392.

[10] Mironenko, V.M., Yatusevich, A.I., Subbotina, I.A. (2008). Emeriosis-helminthiase mixed infections of cattle in the Polessky region of Belarus and methods of control. PrirodnayasredaPoles'ya: osobennosti i perspektivyrazvitiya: abstracts of the IV International Scientific Conference. Brest: Al'ternativa, p. 171.

[11] Mironenko, V.M., Korchevskaya, E.A. (2009). Identification of the type of eimeria based on a two-dimensional mathematical analysis of the structure of oocysts. Uchenyyezapiski ``Vitebskayaordena "ZnakPocheta" gosudarstvennayaakademiyaveterinarnoymeditsiny''. Scientific and practical journal, vol. 45, pp. 123–126.

[12] Mkrtchyan, M.E., Vostrukhina, A.S., Kalinina, E.S. (2012). The current state of the problem of the spread of eimeriosis among farm animals in the Udmurt Republic. VestnikIzhevskoy SAA, vol. 2(31), pp. 49–51.

[13] Usarova, E.I. (2007). Coccidia (Coccidia, Sporozoa) of cattle in the farms of the Republic of Dagestan. Izvestiya DGTTU, no. 1, pp. 58–60.

[14] Duszynski, D.V., Couch, L., Upton, S.J. (2000). The Coccidia of the World. K-State Parasitology Laboratory. Retrieved from: http://www.ksu.edu/parasitology/ world coccidia. Accessed 29 April 2013.

[15] Fitzgerald, P.R., Mansfield, M.E. (1984). Control of bovine coccidiosis with monensin: In nonresistant newborn calves. Am. Journal Veter. Res., vol. 10, pp. 1984–1988.

[16] Jubb, T.F. (1988). Nervous disease associated with coccidiosis in goung cattle farmer and the practitioner. Austral. Veter.Journal, vol. 65. pp. 353–354.

[17] Pellerdy, L.P. (1974). Coccidia and Coccidiosis. D. Budapest: AcademiaiKiado, pp. 13–44.