Published date: Nov 25 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”

Pages: 173–182

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i14.5603

Yury Tsoyfemaks@bk.ruFederal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), Federal Budgetary Scientific Institution, Moscow, Russia

Vladimir KirsanovFederal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), Federal Budgetary Scientific Institution, Moscow, Russia

Ravza BaishevaFederal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), Federal Budgetary Scientific Institution, Moscow, Russia

The paper presents a mathematical modeling of the process of movement of milk in the pipe in the formation of the slug flow. The estimation of the degree of destabilization of milk fat from hydromechanical factors is presented, which is 6-10% for the obtained values of the flow rate. Experimental and calculated data show that with the slug flow of transporting milk from the milking unit collector to the upper milk line, the slug speed reaches significant values exceeding 10 m/s, and the acceleration at the border of sections I and II is 150 m/s2. All this creates prerequisites for intensive hydromechanical effects on the dispersed composition of fat in milk.

[1] Allcock, J., Postma, E. (2013). Understanding dynamic milking machine tests. Livestock, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 24–29. DOI: org/10.12968/live.2013.18.2.24.

[2] Wagner, A.M., Ruegg, P.L. (2002). The Effect of Manual Forestripping on Milking Performance of Holstein Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 1–6.

[3] Upton, J., Reinemann, D.J., Penry, J.F., Thompson, P.D. (2016). A quarter milking analysis device e Development and demonstration. Biosystems Engineering, pp. 259–264.

[4] Sedov, L.I. (1973). Continuum mechanics, vol. I. Moscow: Science, 384 p.

[5] Gonzalez-Mejia, A., Styles, D., Wilson, P., Gibbons, J. (2018). Metrics and methods for characterizing dairy farm intensification using farm survey data. PLOS ONE, no. 13(5), e0195286. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195286

[6] Matthews, C.A., Shaw, J.M., Earl, W. (2017). The economy and efficiency of a milking machine. IOWA State University, vol. 21, no. 248, pp. 1–24.

[7] Mamaev, V.A., Odisharia, G., Klapchuk, O.V. et al. (1978). The movement of gas-liquid mixtures in pipes. Moscow, Nedra, 270 p. [8] Melnikov, S.V. (1985). Technological equipment of livestock farms and complexes. Leningrad:Agropromizdat, 640 p.

[9] Meschersky, I.V. (1952). Works on the mechanics of bodies of variable mass. Moscow: Gostekhizdat.

[10] Kosmodemyansky, A.A. (1966). The course of theoretical mechanics, part II. Moscow, pp. 70–72.

[11] Levich, V.G. (1952). Physico-chemical hydrodynamics. Moscow, p. 498–524.

[12] Sanchis, A., Johnson, G.W., Jensen, A. (2011) The Formation of Hydrodynamic Slugs by the Interaction of Waves In Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Pipe Flow, Int. Journal Multiphase Flow, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 358–368.

[13] Fonseca, Jr.R., Barras, Jr.J.M., Azevedo, L.F.A. (2009). Liquid Velocity Field and Bubble Shape Measurements in Two-Phase, Horizontal Slug Flow. Proceedings of COBEM 2009. Gramado, RS Brazil, COB09-245.

[14] Carneiro, J.N.E., Fonseca Jr. R., Ortega, A.J., Chucuya, R.C., Nieckele, A.O., Azevedo, L.F.A. (2011). Statistical characterization of two-phase slug flow in a horizontal pipe. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, no. 33(spe1), pp. 251–258. Retrieved from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-58782011000500007

[15] Want, X., Guo, L., Zhang, X., (2007). An Experimental Study of the Statistical Parameters of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipeline. Int. Journal Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 50, pp. 2439–2443.