Published date: Nov 01 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science»

Pages: 454–461

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3303

S Kiselevs.j.kiselev@urfu.ru

O Lvova

E Suleymanova

It is known that prematurity is a risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Most of the studies were dedicated to those children who have reached the preschool and primary school age. However, the impact of prematurity on neurocognitive functions in the early stages of development is not investigated thoroughly. The aim of this
research was to reveal the differences in neurocognitive development in premature (24 babies) and gender-matched healthy mature full-term infants (31 participants) at 5 months of age. The gestational age of preterm children was between 29 and 35 weeks. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd Edition) were used to evaluate the neurocognitive abilities in children. The one-way ANOVA has revealed
that premature infants at 5 months of corrected age performed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more poorly than the full-term infants on cognitive scale, receptive language, gross and fine motor. No significant differences (p ≤.05) were found between preterm and full-term children on expressive language. In view of the obtained results, it
can be assumed that the prematurity has specific (not global) negative effect on neurocognitive development at 5 months of age.

Keywords: premature infants, neurocognitive development, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd Edition)

[1] Blackmon, L. R., et al. (2004). Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1362–1364.


[2] Chang, H. H., et al. (2013). Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet, vol. 381, no. 9862, pp. 223–234.


[3] Blencowe, H., et al. (2012). National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: A systematic analysis and implications. Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9832, pp. 2162–2172.


[4] Anderson, P. J. and Doyle, L. W. (2008). Cognitive and educational deficits in children born extremely preterm. Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 51–58.


[5] Dewey, D., Crawford, S. G., Creighton, D. E., et al. (2000). Parents’ ratings of everyday cognitive abilities in very low birth weight children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–43.


[6] Inder, T. E., Warfield, S. K., Wang, H., et al. Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants. Pediatrics, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 286–294.


[7] Evensen, K. A. I., Skranes, J., Brubakk, A.-M., et al. Predictive value of early motor evaluation in preterm very low birth weight and term small for gestational age children. Early Human Development, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 511–518.


[8] Stolt, S., Haataja, L., Lapinleimu, H., et al. (2009). The early lexical development and its predictive value to language skills at 2 years in very-low-birth-weight children. Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 107–123.


[9] Sun, J., Mohay, H., and O’Callaghan, M. (2009). A comparison of executive function in very preterm and term infants at 8 months corrected age. Early Human Development, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 225–230.


[10] Aylward, G. P. (2002). Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: More than IQ scores. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 234–240.


[11] Stephens, B. E. and Vohr, B. R. (2009). Neurodevelopmental Outcome of the Premature Infant. Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 56, no. 3, p. 631+.


[12] Marlow, N., Wolke, D., Bracewell, M. A., et al. (2005). Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 9–19.


[13] Bohm, B., Smedler, A. C., and Forssberg, H. (2004). Impulse control, working memory and other executive functions in preterm children when starting school. Acta Paediatrica, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1363–1371.


[14] Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., Jankowski, J. J., et al. (2002). A longitudinal study of visual expectation and reaction time in the first year of life. Child Development, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 47–61.


[15] Cromwell, E. A., et al. (2014). Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 223–230.


[16] Milne, S., McDonald, J., and Comino, E. J. (2012). The Use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III with Clinical Populations: A Preliminary Exploration. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 24–33.


[17] Spittle, A. J., Doyle, L. W., and Boyd, R. N. (2008). A systematic review of the clinometric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 254– 266.


[18] Ross, G. (1985). Use of the Bayley Scales to Characterize abilities of prematureinfants. Child Development, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 835–842.


[19] Pinon, M. (2010). Theoretical Background and Structure of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition, in L. G. Weiss, T. Oakland, and G. P. Aylward, (eds.) Bayley-III Clinical Use and Interpretation, pp. 1–28.


[20] Anderson, P. J., De Luca, C. R., Hutchinson, E., et al. (2010). Underestimation of Developmental Delay by the New Bayley-III Scale. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 352–356.


[21] Leonard, C. H., Piecuch, R. E., and Cooper, B. A. (2001). Use of the Bayley infant neurodevelopmental screener with low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 33–40.


[22] Meisels, S. J., Cross, D. R., and Plunkett, J. W. (1987). Use of the Bayley Infant Behavior Record with Preterm and Full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 475–482.


[23] Yu, Y.-T., et al. (2013). A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 3875–3883.


[24] Macha, T. and Petermann, F. (2015). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition - Deutsche Fassung. Zeitschrift fur Psychiatr. Psychol. und Psychother., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 139–143.


[25] Anderson, P., Doyle, L. W., and Stu, V. I. C. (2003). Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 24, pp. 3264–3272.


[26] Duncan, A. F., et al. (2012). Effect of ethnicity and race on cognitive and language testing at age 18-22 months in extremely preterm infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 160, no. 6, p. 966+.


[27] Greene, M. M., Patra, K., Nelson, M. N., et al. (2012). Evaluating preterm infants with the Bayley-III: Patterns and correlates of development. Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1948–1956.


[28] Nordhov, S. M., Ronning, J. A., Dahl, L. B., et al. (2010). Early intervention improves cognitive outcomes for preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. E1088–E1094.


[29] Hunnius, R. H., Geuze, M. J., and Zweens,A. F. (2008). Effects of preterm experience on the developing visual system: A longitudinal study of shifts of attention and gaze in early infancy. Developmental Neuropsychology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 521–535.