Published date: Nov 01 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science»

Pages: 346–358

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3293

V Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya

Y Dmitrievadmitrieva.julia.86@mail.ru

S Korobova

The urgency of the study on the system of psychophysiological and psychological (temperamental and personal) factors of stress exposure in a situation of professional evaluation of the subjects is considered. The results of the empirical study of stress factors including psychophysiological, temperological and personal characteristics of the subjects are given. The analysis is made with the use of hardware–software system ‘Aktivatsiometr 9К’ by Y.А. Tsagarelli to detect psychophysiological parameters (functional hemispheric asymmetry, activation of the brain hemispheres, strength and lability of the nervous system), «Structure of temperament questionary» by V.М. Rusalov, and diagnosis of the strategic options for choosing a life journey of
the ‘Typology of Personal Choice’ by V.G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya and A.S. Maltseva. Individually typological, as well as dynamic and activity-situational (in a situation of professional evaluation) characteristics of activation and hemispheric asymmetry of the subjects are calculated. Stress reaction is detected, provided individual-typological and activity situational characteristics of activation of the subjects differ by more than 1.5 times. Fifty-six senior students aging between 20 and 25 are the sample of the analysis. The sample is divided into two groups in accordance with the response to the situation of assessment of professional competence: group 1 (n1 = 19 people) with a detected stress reaction, group 2 (n1 = 37 people), in which the stress reaction
is not detected. The correctness of the obtained differentiation in the groups of students, differing in the system of indicators of psychophysiological, temperological and personal characteristics is proved with the help of discriminate analysis. The model of stress exposure in a situation of professional evaluation is developed.

Keywords: functional hemispheric asymmetry, everyday stress, professional evaluation, temperamental characteristics, personal choice

[1] Arshavskiy, V. V. (1988). Mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya v sisteme poiskovoy aktivnosti (k probleme adaptatsii cheloveka v pripolyarnykh regionakh SeveraVostoka SSSR) [Interhemispheric asymmetry in the system of search activity (to the problem of human adaptation in the circumpolar regions of the North-East of the USSR)]. Vladivostok: Izd-vo AN SSSR, DVO.


[2] Berdichevskaya, E. M. and Gronskaya, A. S. (2009). Funktsional’nye asimmetrii i sport [Functional asymmetries and sports], in V. F. Fokin, I. N. Bogolepova, B. Gutnik, V. I. Kobrin, and V. V. Shul’govskiy (eds.) Rukovodstvo po funktsional’noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii, pp. 636–676). Moscow: Nauchnyy mir.


[3] Bodrov, V. A. (1999). Kognitivnye protsessy i psikhologicheskiy stress [Cognitive processes and psychological stress]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 64–72.


[4] Bodrov, V. A. (2006). Psikhologicheskiy Stress: Razvitie i Preodolenie [Psychological Stress: Development and Coping]. Moscow: Per Se.


[5] Bodrov, V. A. Dikaya, L. G., and Zhuravlev, A. L. (2012). Psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya k professional’noy deyatel’nosti: osnovnye napravleniya i rezul’taty issledovaniy [Psychological adaptation to professional activity: the main directions and results of research], in V. A. Bodrov and A. L. Zhuravlev (eds.) Aktual’nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoy psikhologii i ergonomiki, Vypusk 3, pp. 9–32. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.


[6] Bokhan, T. G. (2008). Kul’turno-istoricheskiy podkhod kak metodologicheskaya osnova razrabotki problemy stressa s uchetom printsipov postneklassicheskoy nauki [Cultural-historical approach as a methodological basis for the development of the problem of stress, taking into account the principles of post-non-classical science]. Vestnik TGU, vol. 314, pp. 165–169.


[7] Dikaya, L. G. (2003). Psikhicheskaya samoregulyatsiya funktsional’nogo sostoyaniya cheloveka [Mental Self-regulation of a Person’s Functional State]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.


[8] Dikaya, L. G. (2012). Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie i lichnostnye aspekty samoregulyatsii funktsional’nogo sostoyaniya cheloveka [Socio-psychological and personal aspects of self-regulation of a person’s functional state], in V. A. Bodrov and A. L. Zhuravlev (eds.) Aktual’nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoy psikhologii i
ergonomiki, Vypusk 3, pp. 163–181. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.


[9] Fokin, V. F. and Ponomareva, N. V. (2004). Dinamicheskie kharakteristiki funktsional’noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii [Dynamic characteristics of functional interhemispheric asymmetry], in N. N. Bogolepov and V. F. Fokin (eds.) Funktsional’naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya, Khrestomatiya, pp. 349–368. Moscow:
Nauchnyy mir.


[10] Fokin, V. F., Ponomareva, N. V., Krotenkova, M. V., et al. (2011). Faktory, opredelyayushchie dinamicheskie svoystva funktsional’noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii [Factors determining the dynamic properties of functional interhemispheric asymmetry]. Asimmetriya, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–20.


[11] Glozman, Zh. M., Kovyazina, M. S., and Ermolaev, D. V. (2000). Rol’ pravogo i levogo polushariy v emotsional’noy otsenke zritel’nykh stimulov [The role of the right and left hemispheres in the emotional evaluation of visual stimuli]. Fiziologiya cheloveka, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 25–29.


[12] Golovey, L. A. and Strizhitskaya, O. Yu. (2016). Osobennosti struktury povsednevnykh stressorov i resursov lichnosti v raznye periody vzroslosti [Features of the structure of everyday stressors and personal resources in different periods of adulthood], in A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko, N. V. Tarabrina, N. E. Kharlamenkova
(eds.) Psikhologiya povsednevnogo i travmaticheskogo stressa: ugrozy, posledstviya i sovladanie, pp. 27–49. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.


[13] Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G. and Mal’tseva, A. S. (2016). Tipologiya lichnostnogo vybora zhiznennogo puti: opisanie metodiki i rezul’taty psikhometricheskoy proverki [Typology of personal choice of life path: a description of the methodology and results of psychometric testing]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 14–21.


[14] Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G., Dmitrieva, Yu. A., Glukhova, V. A., et al. (2016). Resursy innovatsionnogo liderstva menedzherov: psikhologicheskiy innovatsionnyy audit: uchebnoe posobie [Resources of Innovative Leadership of Managers: Psychological Innovation Audit: A Training Manual]. Chelyabinsk: Izdatel’skiy tsentr YuUrGU.


[15] Il’in, E. P. (2008). Differentsial’naya psikhologiya professional’noy deyatel’nosti [;Differential Psychology of Professional Activity]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.


[16] Khomskaya, E. D. (1995). Ob asimmetrii blokov mozga [About the asymmetry of the brain blocks], in E. D. Khomskaya (eds.) Neyropsikhologiya segodnya, pp. 14–27. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.


[17] Khutornaya, M. L. (2007). Osobennosti proyavleniya stressoustoychivosti studentov razlichnykh spetsial’nostey [Features of manifestation of stress resistance of students of various specialties]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki, vol. 11, no. 55, pp. 223–228.


[18] Korsakova, N. K. and Kovyazina, M. S. (2015). Novyy vzglyad na staruyu problemu: kategoriya «sindrom» v psikhologii [A new look at the old problem: the category of ”syndrome” in psychology]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, vol. 2, no. 18, pp. 66–76.


[19] Kovyazina, M. S. and Balashova, E. Yu. (2009). Mezhpolusharnoe vzaimodeystvie pri normal’nom i otklonyayushchemsya razvitii: mozgovye mekhanizmy i psikhologicheskie osobennosti [Interhemispheric interaction in normal and deviant development: brain mechanisms and psychological features], in V. F. Fokin, I.
N. Bogolepova, B. Gutnik, V. I. Kobrin, and V. V. Shul’govskiy (eds.) Rukovodstvo po funktsional’noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii, pp. 185–206. Moscow: Nauchnyy mir.


[20] Kovyazina, M. S. and Kuznetsova, D. A. (2009). Neyropsikhologicheskoe issledovanie mezhpolusharnoy organizatsii neproizvol’noy pamyati [Neuropsychological study of interhemispheric organization of involuntary memory]. Psikhologiya v Rossii: sovremennoe sostoyanie, vol. 4, pp. 279–288.


[21] Luria, A. R. (2000). Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narusheniya pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga [Higher Cortical Functions of a Person and Their Disturbances in Case of Local Brain Lesions]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt.


[22] Luria, A. R. (2002). Priroda chelovecheskikh konfliktov: ob”ektivnoe izuchenie dezorganizatsii povedeniya cheloveka [The Nature of Human Conflicts: An Objective Study of the Disorganization of Human Behavior]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr.


[23] Maslou, A. (1997). Dal’nie predely chelovecheskoy psikhiki [The Far Limits of the Human Psyche]. Saint Petersburg: Evraziya.


[24] Mey, R. (2012). Sud’ba i svoboda [Fate and Freedom]. Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovaniy.


[25] Mikheeva, A. V. (2016). Osobennosti stressoustoychivosti i trevozhnosti u muzhchin i zhenshchin [Features of stress and anxiety in men and women]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika, vol. 2, pp. 78–84.


[26] Nasledov, A. D. (2013). IBM Statistics 20 i AMOS: professional’nyy statisticheskiy analiz dannykh [IBM Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional Statistical Analysis of Data]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.


[27] Petrovskiy, V. A. (2010). Chelovek nad situatsiey [Man Over the Situation]. Moscow: Smysl.


[28] Rean, A. A., Kudashev, A. R., and Baranov, A. A. (2006). Psikhologiya adaptatsii lichnosti. Analiz, teoriya, praktika. Nauchno-uchebnoe izdanie [Psychology of Personality Adaptation. Analysis, Theory, Practice. Scientific and Educational Edition]. Saint Petersburg: Praym-EVROZNAK.


[29] Rusalov, V. M. (1992). Oprosnik struktury temperamenta [Structure Temperament Questionary]. Moscow: Smysl.


[30] Rusalova, M. N. (2003). Funktsional’naya asimmetriya mozga i emotsii [Functional asymmetry of the brain and emotions]. Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 93–112.


[31] Simonov, P. V., Rusalova, M. N., Preobrazhenskaya, L. A., et al. (1995). Faktor novizny i asimmetriya deyatel’nosti mozga [The novelty factor and the asymmetry of brain activity]. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 13–17.


[32] Sirotyuk, A. L. (2014). Individual’nyy lateral’nyy profil’ kak osnova individual’nosti cheloveka v tvorchestve, stresse, obuchenii i professional’noy orientatsii [Individual Lateral Profile as the Basis of a Person’s Individuality in Creativity, Stress, Teaching and Vocational Guidance]. Saint Petersburg: ViEl’.


[33] Sirotyuk, A. L. and Duminike, Yu. S. (2015). Psikhofiziologicheskaya osnova individual’nosti cheloveka v obuchenii i sporte [Psychophysiological basis of a person’s individuality in teaching and sports]. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya «Pedagogika i psikhologiya», vol. 4, pp. 59–68.


[34] Sushko, N. G. (1998). Lichnostnye determinanty organizatsionnogo stressa [Personal determinants of organizational stress], avtoref. Dis. Dok. Psikhol. Nauk, SPb.


[35] Tsagarelli, Yu. A. (2009). Sistemnaya diagnostika cheloveka i razvitie psikhicheskikh funktsiy: uchebnoe posobie [Systemic Diagnosis of Man and the Development of Mental functions: A Textbook]. Kazan’: Poznanie.


[36] Tserkovskiy, A. L. (2011). Sovremennye vzglyady na problemu stressoustoychivosti [Modern views on the problem of stress resistance]. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–19.


[37] Vasilyuk, F. E. (1984). Psikhologiya perezhivaniya [Psychology of Experience]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU.


[38] Vodop’yanova, N. E. (2009). Psikhodiagnostika stressa [Psychodiagnostics of Stress]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.


[39] Zankovskiy, A. N. (1991). Professional’nyy stress i funktsional’nye sostoyaniya


[Professional stress and functional states], in Psikhologicheskie problemy professional’noy deyatel’nosti, pp. 144–156. Moscow: Nauka.


[40] Zelenova, M. E. (2013). Individual’nyy stil’ samoregulyatsii kak vnutrenniy resurs stressoustoychivosti sub”ektov trudovoy deyatel’nosti [Individual style of selfregulation as an internal resource of stress-resistance of subjects of labor activity]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, vol. 1, pp. 69–82.


[41] Zhuravlev, A. L. (2016). Sovremennye aspekty issledovaniya povsednevnogo i travmaticheskogo stressa [Modern aspects of the study of everyday and traumatic stress], in A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko, N. V. Tarabrina, and N. E. Kharlamenkova (eds.) Psikhologiya povsednevnogo i travmaticheskogo stressa: ugrozy, posledstviya i sovladanie, pp. 5–26. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.