Published date: Nov 01 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science»

Pages: 20–29

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3259

A Agafonovaa181067@yandex.ru

A Kryukova

Y Shilov

The article describes the research, the aim of which is to discover the effect of transfer of the implicit knowledge of artificial grammar to solving of sensory-motor tasks. The article considers the role of implicit knowledge in actual cognitive activity. Forty volunteers took part in the experiment. Participants of the experiment were
implicitly taught the rule of artificial grammar. At the control phase, the assignment consisted of solving the sensory-motor problem – to react to the appearance of the green or yellow circle by pressing a certain key. In the experimental group, the grammatical line always appeared before the green-colored circle was presented, and the ungrammatical line appeared before the yellow-colored circle. In the control group the color of the circle didn’t depend on the grammaticality of the line. As a result, we established the considerable reduction in the reaction time in the experimental group. Thus, the transfer of the implicitly learned knowledge of artificial grammar leads to enhancement of efficiency of sensory-motor activity. The implicit rule of artificial
grammar has acquired role of prime-stimulation.

Keywords: implicit knowledge, implicit learning, artificial grammar learning, sensorymotor activity, transfer effect, priming

[1] Agafonov, A. (2010). Priming effect as a result of the nonconscious activity of consciousness. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 17–32.


[2] Altmann, G., Dienes, Z., and Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 899–912.


[3] Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 88–104.


[4] Brooks, L. R. and Vokey, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 316–323.


[5] Falikman, M. V. and Koifman, A. Ya. (2005). Types of priming-effects in researches of perception and perceptive attention. Bulletin of MSU. Series 14. Psychology, pp. 86–97.


[6] Higham, P. A., Vokey, J. R. and Pritchard, J. L. (2000). Beyond dissociation logic: Evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 457–470.


[7] Kudelkina, N. S. (2017). Every set is priming, but not each priming is a set. The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–59.


[8] Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 133, pp. 227–244.


[9] Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 115–119.