Published date: Oct 15 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Mitigating Risks and Emergency Planning – Life Sciences Track

Pages: 128–138

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i6.3096

F Alkhalifa

N Almurbati

J P Silva

A Wilkins

Like the rest of the world, the landscape of architecture has changed in many of the Arabian Gulf cities with the introduction of new design technologies and parameterisation methods. Some of the contemporary designs of building facades comprise of perforated walls generated by computer software. Such perforations are similar in their shapes and nature to the Lotus Seed Pod. An image with specific spatial properties that have been found to negatively affect its viewers and cause a state of visual discomfort termed trypophobia. The new condition, recently studied by a limited number of researchers triggers physiological and psychological reactions
that range from headaches, sickness to even vomiting in some extreme cases. Using on-site surveys as the primary method for investigation, this research measures the baseline of the trypophobic population in Bahrain to be between 26.50% and 39.32%, a number that is much larger than the UK’s estimated baseline of 13–17%. The results also showed that reactions to natural stimuli are much more severe than manmade
ones. Nevertheless, reactions to manmade stimuli are still significant. The study highlights the need to further investigate the effects of parameterisation methods on building designs in relation to visual discomfort.

Keywords: Trypophobia, visual discomfort, Architecture, Bahrain

[1] Aminuddin, I. and Lotfi, H.A., 2017. Understanding trypophobia: the fear of holes. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry, 25(2).


[2] Chaya, K. et al., 2016. Fear of eyes: Triadic relation among social anxiety, trypophobia, and discomfort for eye cluster. PeerJ, 4(9).


[3] Cole, G. and Wilkins, A., 2013. Fear of Holes. Psychological Science, 24(10), pp.1980- 1985.


[4] Cordero, E., 2001. Sustainability in Architecture (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)


[5] Evans, G.W. and McCoy, J.M., 1998. When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental psychology, 18(1), pp.85-94.


[6] Fiamma, P., 2003. Architectural design and digital paradigm: From Renaissance models to digital architecture. In Connecting crossroads of digital discourse (Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture). India-napolis: ACADIA (pp. 247-253).


[7] Fiamma, P., 2011. Architecture: from Generative Design. DISEGNARE CON, pp.152- 161.


[8] Fusero, P., Massimiano, L., Tedeschi, A. and Lepidi, S. (2013). Parametric Urbanism: A new frontier for smart Cities, Planum, The Journal of Urbanism, 27(2), pp. 1-13.


[9] Imaizumi, S. & Tanno, Y., 2018. Rasch analysis of the Trypophobia Questionnaire. BMC Res Notes, 11(128).


[10] Kupfer, T.R., Le, A.T.D., 2018. Disgusting clusters: trypophobia as an overgeneralised disease avoidance response. Cognition and Emotion 32, 729–741.


[11] Le, A.T., 2015. An exploration of trypophobia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).


[12] Oxman, R., 2008. Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies, 29(2), pp.99–120.


[13] Ruggiero, F., Florensa, R. S., & Dimundo, A. 2009. Re-interpretation of traditional architecture for visual comfort. Building and Environment, 44(9), .1886-1891


[14] Stavric, M. and Marina, O., 2011. Parametric modelling for advanced architecture. International journal of applied mathematics and informatics, 5(1), pp.9-16.


[15] Tedeschi, A. and Andreani, S., 2014. AAD, Algorithms-aided Design: Parametric Strategies Using Grasshopper. Le Penseur Publisher.


[16] Terzidis, K., 2004. Algorithmic Design: A Paradigm Shift in Architecture? Architecture in the Network Society [22nd eCAADe Conference Proceedings/ISBN 0-9541183-2-4] Copenhagen (Denmark) 15-18 September 2004, pp. 201-207, pp.201–207