Published date: Sep 13 2022

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI) – Life Sciences Chapter

Pages: 368–375

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v0i0.11820

A Fanindiafanindi@gmail.comIndonesian Research Institut of Animal Production, Jalan Veteran III, Ciawi Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

Harmini .Indonesian Research Institut of Animal Production, Jalan Veteran III, Ciawi Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

Sajimin .Indonesian Research Institut of Animal Production, Jalan Veteran III, Ciawi Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

E SutediIndonesian Research Institut of Animal Production, Jalan Veteran III, Ciawi Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

I HerdiawanIndonesian Research Institut of Animal Production, Jalan Veteran III, Ciawi Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

The limiting factor in acid dry land is root poisoning by Al3+. Hamill cultivar (Panicum maximum cv Hamil) is a plant that is commonly used by farmer, where the production of the dry matter is not much different from elephant grass. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of hamil cultivars on acid soil. The research was conducted in the greenhouse of the Research Institute of Animal Production in Ciawi. The research used a completely randomized design with 10 replications, the treatment included 2 types of soil: acid soil (pH 4.5 Al3+ 2.7 cmol kg−1) and non-acid soil (pH 7, Al3+ + 2.7cmol kg−1). Plants were planted using pols in pots measuring 40 cm x 30 cm. The variables observed were morphological characters, generative phase, forage production and seed production. The results showed that almost all morphological characters on acid soils were lower (P <0.05). The fresh and dry weight of forage at the first and second harvests in non-acid soils was 50% higher (P <0.05). The booting and flowering age was faster (P <0.05) in non-acid. Seed production on non-acid soils was higher (P <0.05). The reduced productivity of the Hamill necessitated a solution that is tolerant of acid dry land.

Keywords: Hamil cultivar, acid soil, seed production

[1] Clements RJ, and Henzell EF 2010 Pasture research and development in northern Australia: an ongoing scientific adventure. Tropical Grasslands 44 221–230

[2] Anonim 1972 Register of Australian Herbage Plant Cultivars A. Grasses 6. Panic Panicum maximum Jacq. (Panic or Guinea grass)

[3] Sutedi E, Yuhaeni S and Prawiradiputra BR 2002. Karakterisasi rumput benggala (P.maximum) sebagai pakan ternak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. Puslitbangnak. Bogor.

[4] Siregar ME, Martawijaya M and Herawati T 1980 Pengaruh tatalaksana interval panen terhadap kuantitas dan kualitas produksi rumput benggala (P. maximum cv Guinea). Bulletin Lembaga Penelitian Peternakan. 26 5-9

[5] Mulyani A and Sarwani M 2013 Karakteristik dan potensi lahan sub optimal untuk pengembangan pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan 7 47-55

[6] Yan L, Riaz M, Liu Y, Zeng Y and Jiang C 2019 Aluminum toxicity could be mitigated with boron by altering the metabolic patterns of amino acids and carbohydrates rather than organic acids in trifoliate orange Tree Physiology 39 1572–1582

[7] Singh S, Tripathi DK, Singh S, Sharma S, Dubey NK, Chauhan DK and Vaculík M 2017 Toxicity of aluminium on various levels of plant cells and organism: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany 137 177–193

[8] Poschenrieder C 2008 A glance into aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Sci. Total Environ 400 356–368

[9] Prawiradiputra BR, Sajimin, Purwantari ND and Herdiawan I 2006 Hijauan pakan ternak di Indonesia Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian Jakarta pp 163

[10] Zelinová V, Halušková Ľ, Huttová J, Illéš P, Mistrík I, Valentovičová K and Tamás L 2011. Short-term aluminium-induced changes in barley root tips. Protoplasma 248 523–530.

[11] Krstic D, Djalovic I, Nikezic D, and Bjelic D 2012. Aluminium in acid soils: Chemistry, toxicity and impact on maize plants in: Aladjadjiyan A (Ed.) Food Production - Approaches, Challenges and Tasks. In Tech.

[12] Shetty R. and Prakash NB 2020 Effect of different biochars on acid soil and growth parameters of rice plants under aluminium toxicity. Scientific Reports 10 1-10

[13] Rahman MD, Lee SH, Ji H, Kabir A, Jones C and Lee KW 2018 Importance of mineral nutrition for mitigating aluminum toxicity in plants on acidic soils: Current status and opportunities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19 3073.

[14] Alem P, Thomas PA, and Marc and Lersel WV 2015 Use of Controlled Water Deficit to Regulate Poinsettia Stem Elongation. Hortscience 50 234–239

[15] Rahman M, Haque M, Sikdar B, Islam M and Matin M 2014 Correlation analysis of flag leaf with yield in several rice cultivars. Journal of Life and Earth Science, 8 49–54

[16] Heidari H 2017 Source-sink manipulation effects on wheat seed yield and seed germination characteristics. Biharean Biologist, 11 33–36

[17] Kopittke PM, Moore KL, Lombi E, Gianoncelli A, Ferguson BJ, Blamey FP, Menzies NW, Nicholson TM, McKenna BA, Wang P, and Gresshoff PM 2015 Identification of the primary lesion of toxic aluminum in plant roots. Plant Physiol 167 1402-1411.

[18] Silva S 2012 Aluminium toxicity targets in plants. J Bot 219462 1-8

[19] Arroyave C, Tolrà R, Thuy T, Barceló J and Poschenried C 2013 Differential aluminum resistance in Brachiaria species. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 89 11-18

[20] Barceló J, and Poschenrieder C 2002 Fast root growth responses, root exudates and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance: a review. Environ Exp Bot 48 75-92

[21] Utama MJH 2010 Penapisan Varietas Padi Gogo Toleran Cekaman Aluminium. J. Agron. Indonesia 38 163 – 169

[22] suddin T, Saili and A Hasan. 2016. Relationship of Cow Fertilizer Application with Increased Protein and Crude Fiber Content of Clitoria Ternatea Legume as Animal Feed Forage. JITRO. 3 (2) : 81-86

[23] Keraf FK, Y Nulik dan ML Mullik. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Plant Age on Production and Quality of Kume (Sorghum plumosum var. timorense). Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. 2015;17(2):123–30.

[24] Lee C, Hristov AN, Cassidy TW, Heyler KS, Lapierre H, Varga GA, et al. Rumenprotected lysine, methionine, and histidine increase milk protein yield in dairy cows fed a metabolizable protein-deficient diet. J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):6042–56.

[25] Giallongo F, Hristov AN, Oh J, Frederick T, Weeks H, Werner J, et al. Effects of slow-release urea and rumen-protected methionine and histidine on performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2015 May;98(5):3292–308.

[26] McDonal P, Edwards RA, Greenhalg JF, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG. Animal Nutrition Seven Edition. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall; 2012.

[27] Schwab CG, Huhtanen P, Hunt C, Hvelplund T. Ni-trogen requirements of cattle. In: Pfeffer E, Hristov A, editors. Nitrogen and Phos-phorus Nutrition of Cattle. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2005. pp. 13–70.