KnE Life Sciences
ISSN: 2413-0877
The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.
Conception Rate of the Madura Cattle in the Special Artificial Insemination Program (SIWAB) in Waru Sub-district, Pamekasan Regency
Published date: Sep 13 2022
Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences
Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI) – Life Sciences Chapter
Pages: 300–308
Authors:
Abstract:
Pregnancy rate is one of important indicator for assessing the success of the artificial insemination (AI) program. Since 2017, the Indonesian Government released the Special Artificial Insemination Program (local: SIWAB) in an effort to accelerate the cattle population. This study was conducted to evaluate the pregnancy rate following AI of the Madura Cattle in Waru Sub-district, Pamekasan Regency, an important breeding area for the Madura cattle. The study concerned the effect of bull and season on the insemination of the cows and the pregnancy rate. The season was grouped into 2 categories based on the rainfall intensity: dry and wet season were less than 150 mm/month and more than 150 mm/month, respectively. The secondary data was obtained from 2017 to 2018 involving 6 bulls. The results showed that during 2017 the bull number 2 showed the highest pregnancy rate (53.7%, n = 1,056 vs. 46.3%, n=1.121). According to Chi-square analysis on the number of bulls and pregnancy rate from 2017 to 2018, the result showed that there was no significant effect (P>0.05). The season time of insemination had no effect on pregnancy rate in 2017, but had a significant effect in 2018. Average of service per conception (S/C) and conception rate (CR) on 6 bulls were 1,55 ± 0,08 and 66.0±3.6 %. It was concluded that the bull number 2 had a higher pregnancy rate and season did not have a consistent effect on the pregnancy rate of Maduran cattle in the SIWAB Program.
Keywords: kwd
References:
[1] . Siswijono, SB. VMA Nurgiartiningsih, H Hermanto. 2014 Pengembangan Mode Kelembagaan Konservasi Sapi Madura. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 24 (1), 33-38
[2] . Kustiyah F, M Zali, Riszqina, and Z Nurlaila, 2017, Skenario pembibitan Sapi Madura di pulau Madura. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. 17(1): Hal-hal
[3] . Dirjen Peternakan dan Kesehatn Hewan, 2010
[4] . Nurgiartiningsih, V. M. A. 2011. Peta Potensi Genetik Sapi Madura Murni di Empat Kabupaten di Madura. Jurnal Ternak Tropika Vol. 12 (2) : 23-32.
[5] . Susilawati, T. 2011. Tingkat Keberhasilan Inseminasi Buatan dengan kualitas dan Deposisi Semen yang Berbeda pada Sapi Peranakan Ongole. Jurnal Ternak Tropika. 12 (2): 15-24.
[6] . Susilowati,T. 2013. Pedoman Inseminasi Buatan Pada Ternak, Universitas Brawijaya Press, Malang.
[7] . Setiadi MA. 2005. The role of reproductive health management on dairy and beef cattle farming system. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Devel- opment in the Tropics and Subtropics 88:7-12.
[8] . Dobson H, Smith RF, Royal MD, Knight CH, Sheldon IM. 2007. The high producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance. Journal Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42:17-23.
[9] . Koivisto M.B., M.T. Costa, S.H. Perri and W.R.R. Vicente. 2009. The Effect of Season on Semen Characteristics and Freezability in Bos indicus and Bos taurus Bulls in the Southeastern Region of Brazil. Reproduction Domestic Animal.44 (2) : 587-592.
[10] . Suyadi, L Hakim, S Wahjuningsih, Nugroho. 2014. Reproductive Performance of Peranakan Ongole (PO)- and Limousin x PO crossbred (Limpo) cattle at different altitude areas in East Java, Indonesia. J. Appl. Sci and Agr. 9(11): 81-85
[11] . Nugraha CD, E. Herwijanti, I. Novianti, A. Furqon, W.A. Septian, W. Busono, and S. Suyadi. 2019. Correlation between age of Bali bull and semen production at National Artificial Insemination Center, Singosari-Indonesia. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric. 44(3): 268-265
[12] . S Suyadi, T E Susilorini, W A Septian, A Furqon, C D Nugroho and R F Putri. 2020. Some Factors Affecting the Semen Production Continuity of Elite Bulls: Reviewing Data at Singosari National Artificial Insemination Center(SNAIC), Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 478 012080
[13] . Dinas Peternakan Propinsai Jawa Timur,2020 . Data isihknas 2017 dan 2018.
[14] . Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika ,Stasiun Klimatologi Kelas II Malang, 2020. Data Curah hujan, Suhu rata-rata dan Kelembapan Rata-rata di Kecamatan Waru Kab Pamekasan tahun 2017 dan 2018.
[15] . Diwyanto, K. 2012. Pokok – Pokok Pemikiran Pengelolaan Berkelanjutan Plasma Nutfah Peternakan. Loka Karya Plasma Nutfah Peter- nakan 29 Desember 2005. Puslit- bangnak dan Balitnak. Bogor.
[16] . Karnaen dan Johar Arifin, 2007 Kajian Produktivitas Sapi Madura (Study on Productivity of Madura Cattle), Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, Desember 2007, Vol. 7 No. 2, 135 – 139.
[17] . Iswoyo dan Widyaningrum P. 2008. Performance reproduksi sapi peranakan Simental (PSM). Hasil Inseminasi Buatan di Kabupaten Sukoharjo Jawa tengah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Peternakan.
[18] . Jainudeen, M. R. and Hafez, E. S. E. 2000. Cattle And Buffalo dalam Reproduction In Farm Animals. 7th Edition. Edited by Hafez E. S. E. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Maryland. USA.
[19] . Susilawati, T. 2011. Tingkat Keberhasilan Inseminasi Buatan dengan kualitas dan Deposisi Semen yang Berbeda pada Sapi Peranakan Ongole. Jurnal Ternak Tropika. 12 (2): 15-24.
[20] . Hadi, P. U. dan Ilham, N. 2002. Problem dan Prospek Pengembangan UsahaPembibitan Sapi Potong. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, volume 4 Nomor 21 :149. Pusat Penelitian DanPengembangan Sosial Ekonomi PertanianBogor.
[21] . Fanani S., Subagyo dan Lutojo. 2013. Kinerja Reproduksi Sapi Perah Peranakan Frisien Holstein (PFH) di Kecamata Pudak, Ponorogo. Tropical Husbandry. 2 (1): 21- 27.
[22] . Afiati F, Herdis, dan S. Said. 2013. Pembibitan Ternak Dengan Inseminasi Buatan. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
