KnE Life Sciences

Published date: Nov 26 2017

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security: A Comprehensive Approach (ICSAFS)

Pages: 63-71

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v2i6.1020

Diky Ramdanidiky.ramdani@unpad.ac.id

Abdul S. Chaudhry

Iman Hernaman

Chris J. Seal

Tea leaves are a rich source of plant secondary metabolites such as tannins and saponins that have the potential to manipulate rumen fermentation and to lessen methane (CH₄) production.Samples of green tea (GTL), black tea (BTL), their spent leaves after water extraction (SGTL and SBTL), ryegrass hay (RH), ryegrass silage (RS), paddy straws (PS), barley straws (BS), and wheat straws (WS) were compared for their rumen in-vitro organic matter degradability (IVOMD, g/kg DM), pH, ammonia (NH₃, mg/L), total volatile fatty acids (tVFA, mmol/L), total gas production (tGP, L/kg OM), and methane output (CH₄,L/kg OM) after 28h incubation with buffered rumen fluid under anaerobic conditions at 39^oC in glass syringes. One-way ANOVA on Minitab 16 was used to examine differences between products at P<0.05 for four replicate samples. There were no differences between tea leaf products, RH and RS but the straws tended to have lower IVOMD compared with tea leaf products and other forages. GTL produced the lowest NH₃ followed by BTL, SGTL, SBTL, and other forages. There were no differences between most tea leaf products, RH, RS, and the straws for tVFA concentration but PS and WS produced the lowest tVFA. GTL, SGTL, and RH had higher tGP than BTL, SBTL, and the straws but they had a lower tGP than RS. GTL, BTL, and SBTL produced similar levels of CH₄ as the straws but this was less than RS and SGTL. The results suggest that if tea leaf products are included in the straw-based diets as natural feed additives, they may improve degradability, tVFA, NH₃,and tGP production without increasing CH₄ output. Low NH₃ production for tea leaf products could be the sign of more by-pass protein to be absorbed in small intestine.

[1] Ramdani, D., Chaudhry, A.S., Seal, C.J. 2013. Chemical Composition, Plant Secondary Metabolites, and Minerals of Green and Black Teas and the Effect of Different Teato-Water Ratios during Their Extraction on the Composition of Their Spent Leaves as Potential Additives for Ruminants. Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 61: 4961-4967.

[2] McSweeney, C.S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D.M., Krause, D.O. 2001. Microbial Interactions with Tannins: Nutritional Consequences for Ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 91: 83-93.

[3] Makkar, H.P.S. 2003. Effects and Fate of Tannins in Ruminant Animals, Adaptation to Tannins, and Strategies to Overcome Detrimental Effects of Feeding Tannin-Rich Feeds. Small Ruminant Research, 49: 241-256.

[4] Min, B.R., Barry, T.N., Attwood, G.T., McNabb, W.C. 2003. The Effect of Condensed Tannins on the Nutrition and Health of Ruminants Fed Fresh Temperate Forages: A Review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 106: 3-19.

[5] Mueller-Harvey, I. 2006. Review Unravelling the Conundrum of Tannins in Animal Nutrition and Health. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture, 86: 2010-2037.

[6] Attwood, G.T., Klieve, A.V., Ouwerkerk, D., Patel, B.K.C. 1998. AmmoniaHyperproducing Bacteria from New Zealand Ruminants. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 64: 1796-1804.

[7] Szumacher-Strabel, M., Cieślak, A. 2010. Potential of Phytofactors to Mitigate Rumen Ammonia and Methane Production. Journal of Animal Feed Science, 19: 319- 337.

[8] Hu, W.-L., Liu, J.-X., Ye, J.-A., Wu, Y.-M., Guo, Y.-Q. 2005. Effect of Tea Saponin on Rumen Fermentation In Vitro. Animal Feed Scienceand Technology, 120: 333-339.

[9] Guo, Y.-Q., Liu, J.X., Zhu, W.Y., Denman, S.E., McSweeney, C.S. 2008. Effect of Tea Saponin on Methanogenesis, Microbial Community Structure and Expression of mcrAGene, in Cultures of Rumen Micro-Organisms. Letter of Applied Microbiology, 47: 421-426.

[10] Mao, H.-L., Wang, J.-K., Zhou, Y.-Y., Liu, J.-X. 2010. Effects of Addition of Tea Saponins and Soybean Oil on Methane Production, Fermentation and Microbial Population in the Rumen of Growing Lambs.Livestock Science,129: 56-62.

[11] Moss, A.R., Jouany, J.P., Newbold, J. 2000. Methane Production by Ruminants: Its Contribution to Global Warming. Annales de Zootechnie, 49: 231-253.

[12] Boadi, D., Benchaar, C., Chiquette, J., Massé, D. 2004. Mitigation Strategies to Reduce Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows: Update Review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 84: 319-335.

[13] Attwood, G., McSweeney, C. 2008. Methanogen Genomics to Discover Targets for Methane Mitigation Technologies and Options for Alternative H2 Utilisation in the Rumen. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48: 28–37.

[14] Johnson, K.A., Johnson, D.E. 1995. Methane Emissions from Cattle. Journal of AnimalScience, 73: 2483-2492.

[15] AOAC.2005. Animal Feeds(Chapter 4), in “Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International”. In: William Horwitz, George W. Latimer and Nancy J. Wendt Thiex (Eds).AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

[16] Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for Dietary Fiber, NeutralDetergent Fiber and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.

[17] Van Soest, P.J. 1973. Collaborative Study of Acid-Detergent Fiber and Lignin.Journal of AOAC International, 56: 781-784.

[18] Menke, K.H., Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and In Vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research Development, 28: 7-55.

[19] McDougall, E.I. 1948. Studies on Ruminant Saliva: the Composition and Output of Sheep’s Saliva. Biochemistry Journal,43: 99-100.

[20] Khan, M.M.H., Chaudhry, A.S. 2010. Chemical Composition of Selected Forages and Spices and the Effect of These Spices on In Vitro Rumen Degradability of Some Forages. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 23: 889-900.