Published date: Sep 16 2024

Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

Issue title: July–Sep 2024, Volume 19, Issue 3

Pages: 386–391

DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v19i3.9404

Dilru C.Amarasekera - dilru.cheryl@gmail.com - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-3850

Vikram A. Shankar

Reza Razeghinejad

Purpose: To discuss four cases of post-operative XEN gel stent luminal obstruction in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
Case Report: Four eyes in three patients with primary open angle glaucoma who received XEN stent implantation were found to have luminal obstruction of their stents. Stent obstruction can mimic filtering bleb failures not responding to bleb needling and antimetabolite injections. These obstructions were suspected to result from fibrin clots, iris pigment granules, or breakdown products of intraocular inflammation or hemorrhage. Treatment options trialed in these patients included bleb needling, 5-fluorouracil injection, and YAG laser to the proximal end of the XEN. Ultimately, all four eyes required XEN explantation and alternative filtering surgery.
Conclusion: XEN luminal obstruction is an important complication of stent placement that can ultimately lead to stent failure. Conservative measures such as laser or traditional bleb management may be considered before stent explantation or additional glaucoma surgery.

1. Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:189–206.

2. Post M, Lubinski W, Sliwiak D, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Mularczyk M. XEN Gel Stent in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2020;141:65–76.

3. Lewis RA. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1301–1306.

4. Sheybani A, Reitsamer H, Ahmed, II. Fluid dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:4789–4795.

5. Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, Somers A, Lenzhofer M, Stalmans I, et al. Efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of standalone ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1579–1588.

6. Marcos Parra MT, Salinas Lopez JA, Lopez Grau NS, María Ceausescu A, José Pérez Santonja J. XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;257:1741–1750.

7. Sharpe R, Pham G, Chang P. Comparison of ab interno XEN gelatin stent vs trabeculectomy with mitomycin C: A retrospective study. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2020;14:87– 92.

8. Grover DS, Flynn WJ, Bashford KP, Lewis RA, Duh Y-J, Nangia RS, et al. Performance and safety of a new ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;183:25–36.

9. Galal A, Bilgic A, Eltanamly R, Osman A. XEN glaucoma implant with mitomycin C 1-year follow-up: Result and complications. J Ophthalmol 2017;2017:5457246.

10. Arnould L, Theillac V, Moran S, Gatinel D, Grise-Dulac A. Recurrent exposure of XEN gel stent implant and conjunctival erosion. J Glaucoma 2019;28:e37-e40.

11. Olgun A, Imamoglu S, Karapapak M, Düzgün E, Kaçar H. Endophthalmitis after XEN gel stent implantation: 2 cases. J Glaucoma 2018;27:e191-e4.

12. Buffault J, Baudouin C, Labbe A. Is the Xen(R) gel stent really minimally invasive? Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2020;19:100850.

13. Kennedy A, Haddad F, Georgopoulos M. Aqueous misdirection syndrome following ab interno gelatin stent can be managed successfully with anterior vitrectomy approach. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31:16–19.

14. Gillmann K, Bravetti GE, Mansouri K. Delayed obstruction of XEN gel stent by cell debris in primary openangle glaucoma: A new insight into the pathophysiology of filtration device failure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2019;13:113–115.

15. Gillmann K, Mansouri K, Bravetti GE, Mermoud A. Chronic intraocular inflammation as a risk factor for XEN gel stent occlusion: A case of microscopic examination of a fibrinobstructed XEN stent. J Glaucoma 2018;27:739–741.

16. Tadrosse AF, Khouri AS. Laser iridoplasty to treat irisoccluded XEN gel stent. J Glaucoma 2020;29:e91-e2.

17. Midha N, Gillmann K, Chaudhary A, et al. Efficacy of needling revision after XEN gel stent implantation: A prospective study. J Glaucoma 2020;29:11–14.

18. Karimi A, Lindfield D, Turnbull A, Dimitriou C, Bhatia B, Radwan M, et al. A multi-centre interventional case series of 259 ab-interno Xen gel implants for glaucoma, with and without combined cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2019;33:469–477.

19. Eagle RC Jr., Razeghinejad R. Xen gel stent occlusion with iris pigment epithelium. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;48:258–259.

20. Scantling-Birch Y, Merzougui W, Lindfield D. Early postoperative lumen blockage of ab-interno gel stent (XEN) cleared with Nd:YAG laser. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:524.

21. Sng CCA, Chew PTK, Htoon HM, et al. Case series of combined XEN implantation and phacoemulsification in Chinese eyes: One-year outcomes. Adv Ther 2019;36:3519–3529.

22. Karri B, Gupta C, Mathews D. Endophthalmitis following XEN stent exposure. J Glaucoma 2018;27:931–933.