Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
ISSN: 2008-322X
The latest research in clinical ophthalmology and the science of vision.
Fluorescein versus Indocyanine Green Angiography Guided Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Published date: Mar 10 2024
Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research
Issue title: Jan–Mar 2024, Volume 19, Issue 1
Pages: 12–17
Authors:
Abstract:
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of fluorescein angiography (FA)-guided and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA)-guided half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, medical records of eyes with chronic CSC who underwent half-dose PDT were reviewed. A retina specialist performed FA-guided half-dose PDT, and the other performed ICGA-guided treatment. The success of applying PDT in the resolution of subretinal fluid was compared between the FA- and ICGA-guided methods.
Results: Eighty-two eyes of 73 patients (41 eyes in each group) received half-dose PDT. After half-dose PDT, a significant improvement in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was found at the time of the last follow-up in both groups (both P < 0.001), with no significant intergroup difference. Central subfield and subfoveal choroidal thicknesses decreased significantly in both groups at the last follow-up (all P < 0.05), with no significant differences between the groups. Subretinal fluid (SRF) resolved in all eyes, and no persistent SRF was detected during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: FA-guided and ICG-guided half-dose PDT may have similar efficacy for the treatment of chronic CSC.
Keywords: Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, Fluorescein Angiography, Indocyanine Green Angiography, Photodynamic Therapy
References:
1. Gemenetzi M, De Salvo G, Lotery AJ. Central serous chorioretinopathy: An update on pathogenesis and treatment. Eye 2010;24:1743–1756.
2. van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EHC, Yzer S, Ohno-Matsui K, Keunen JEE, Schlingemann RO, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res 2019;73:100770.
3. Daruich A, Matet A, Dirani A, Bousquet E, Zhao M, Farman N, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;48:82–118.
4. Sartini F, Figus M, Nardi M, Casini G, Posarelli C. Non-resolving, recurrent and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Available treatment options. Eye 2019;33:1035–1043.
5. Taban M, Boyer DS, Thomas EL, Taban M. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: Photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:1073–1080.
6. Erikitola OC, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Lotery AJ, Sivaprasad S. Photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye 2014;28:944–957.
7. Altinel MG, Kanra AY, Totuk OMG, Ardagil A, Kabadayi K. Comparison of half-dose versus half-fluence versus standard photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2021;33:102081.
8. Naseripour M, Falavarjani KG, Sedaghat A, Moghaddam AK, Nasserisina S, Alemzadeh SA. Half-dose photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2016;11:66–69.
9. Viana KÍ S, Leão PMS, Fernandes L, Siqueira R, Ribeiro J, Jorge R. Multimodal assessment of patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2017;80:181–185.
10. Koytak A, Bayraktar H, Ozdemir H. Fluorescein angiography as a primary guide for reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:1807–1813.
11. Hayashida M, Miki A, Honda S, Nakamura M. Comparison between the outcomes of fluorescein angiography-guided and indocyanine green angiography-guided half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;31:101955.
12. Cardillo Piccolino F, Eandi CM, Ventre L, Rigault de la Longrais RC, Grignolo FM. Photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2003;23:752–763.
13. Nicoló M, Eandi CM, Alovisi C, Grignolo FM, Traverso CE, Musetti D, et al. Half-fluence versus half-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:1033– 1037.
14. Liu HY, Yang CH, Yang CM, Ho TC, Lin CP, Hsieh YT. Half-dose versus half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;167:57–64.
15. van Dijk EHC, van Rijssen TJ, Subhi Y, Boon CJF. Photodynamic therapy for chorioretinal diseases: A practical approach. Ophthalmol Ther 2020;9:329–342.
16. Newman DK. Photodynamic therapy: Current role in the treatment of chorioretinal conditions. Eye 2016;30:202–210.
17. Spaide RF, Campeas L, Haas A, Yannuzzi LA, Fisher YL, Guyer DR, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy in younger and older adults. Ophthalmology 1996;103:2070–2079; discussion 9–80.
18. Fujita K, Imamura Y, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, Mizutani Y, Hashizume K, et al. One-year outcomes with half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2015;122:555–561.
19. Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, Tang EW, Liu DT, Lam DS. Safety enhanced photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: One-year results of a prospective study. Retina 2008;28:85–93.
20. Koytak A, Erol K, Coskun E, Asik N, Öztürk H, Özertürk Y. Fluorescein angiography-guided photodynamic therapy with half-dose verteporfin for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 2010;30:1698–1703.
21. Ebrahimiadib N, Mirzaei A, Esfandiarifard S, Tuli S, Najibzadeh E, Imani Fooladi M, et al. Comparison of the fluorescein angiography-guided and indocyanine green angiography-guided photodynamic therapy in the treatment of non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy. Sci Rep 2023;13:1682.