Published date: Apr 19 2023

Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

Issue title: April–June 2023, Volume 18, Issue 2

Pages: 182–191

DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13185

Amit BhardwajCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Praveen VashistCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Suraj Singh SenjamCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Vivek GuptaCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Noopur GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Souvik Mannasouvikmanna311@yahoo.comCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Purpose: To measure the prevalence and causes of visual impairment (VI) among the 40+ age population in two coastal districts of India and to determine the levels of effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) and effective refractive error coverage (eREC) in the study population.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 4200 people chosen using cluster sampling in two coastal districts of Odisha, an eastern state in India. A team consisting of trained optometrists and social workers conducted the ocular examination which included unaided, pinhole, and aided visual acuity assessments followed by examination of the anterior segment and lens.

Results: Overall, 3745 (89.2%) participants were examined from 60 study clusters, 30 in each district. Among those examined, 1677 (44.8%) were men, 2554 (68.2%) were educated and number? (17.8%) used distance spectacles during the survey. The prevalence of VI adjusted for age and gender was 12.77% (95% CI 11.85–13.69%). Multiple logistic regression showed that older age (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.0–4.7) and urban residence (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0–1.6) were associated with VI. Being educated (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3–0.6) and using glasses (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.5–0.2) were found to provide protection; therefore, resulting in lower instances of VI. Cataract (62.7%) and uncorrected refractive errors (27.1%) were the two main causes of VI. The eCSC was 35.1%, the eREC for distance was 40.0%, and the eREC for near was 35.7%.

Conclusion: VI remains a challenge in Odisha, as the prevalence is high and the surgical coverage is poor. Nearly 90% of VI is avoidable indicating that targeted interventions are required to address this problem.

Keywords: Blindness, Cataract, Refractive Error

1. WHO. World report on vision. 2019. p. 180.

2. WHO. Integrated people-centred eye care, including preventable vision impairment and blindness. WHO; 2020. p. 1–4.

3. Vashist P, Senjam S, Gupta V, Gupta N, Rajshekhar V, Shamanna BR. National Blindness & Visual Impairment Survey India 2015–19. A summary report [Internet]. New Delhi; 2019.

4. WHO. Proposed global targets for 2030 on integrated people-centred eye care. WHO; 2020. p. 1–19.

5. Keel S, Müller A, Block S, Bourne R, Burton MJ, Chatterji S, et al. Keeping an eye on eye care: Monitoring progress towards effective coverage. Lancet Glob Heal 2021;9:e1460–1464.

6. Census. District census handbook Khordha - Village and townwise primary census abstract. 2011. p. 1–381.

7. Census. District census handbook Ganjam - Village and town-wise primary census abstract. 2011. p. 1–615.

8. Marmamula S, Khanna RC, Kunkunu E, Rao GN. Population-based assessment of prevalence and causes of visual impairment in the state of Telangana, India: A cross-sectional study using the rapid assessment of visual impairment (RAVI) methodology. BMJ Open 2016;6:1–7.

9. WHO. Change the definition of blindness. WHO.

10. Vashist P, Senjam SS, Gupta V, Gupta N, Shamanna BR, Wadhwani M, et al. Blindness and visual impairment and their causes in India: Results of a nationally representative survey. PLoS One 2022;17:e0271736.

11. Marmamula S, Madala SR, Rao GN. Rapid assessment of visual impairment (RAVI) in marine fishing communities in South India–study protocol and main findings. BMC Ophthalmol 2011;11:26.

12. Gupta N, Vashist P, Malhotra S, Senjam SS, Amit Bhardwaj VM. Rapid assessment of visual impairment in urban population of Delhi, India. PLoS One 2015;10:1–11.

13. Murthy GVS. Trends in gender and blindness in India. Community Eye Heal J 2016;29:4–5.

14. Marmamula S, Narsaiah S, Shekhar K, Khanna RC, Rao GN. Visual impairment in the South Indian State of Andhra Pradesh: Andhra Pradesh - Rapid assessment of visual impairment (AP-RAVI) project. PLoS One 2013;8.

15. Horton S, Gelband H, Jamison D, Levin C, Nugent R, Watkins D. Ranking 93 health interventions for low- and middle-income countries by cost-effectiveness. PLoS One 2017;12:1–12.

16. Jolley E, Buttan S, Engels T, Gillani M, Jadoon MZ, Kabona G, et al. Prevalence of visual impairment and coverage of cataract surgical services: Associations with sex, disability, and economic status in five diverse sites. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2020;27:429–437.

17. Sobti S, Sahni B, Bala K. Surgical coverage of cataract in a rural area of north India: A cross-sectional study. J Fam Med Prim Care 2020;9:4112–4117.

18. Khanna R, Murthy GV. Inequities in cataract surgical coverage in South Asia. Community Eye Heal J 2016;29:6–9.

19. Vijaya L, George R, Rashima A, Raju P, Arvind H, Baskaran M, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:223–228.

20. Bourne RRA, Steinmetz JD, Saylan M, Mersha AM, Weldemariam AH, Wondmeneh TG, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The right to sight: An analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Heal 2021;9:e144–e160.

21. Ramke J, Gilbert CE, Lee AC, Ackland P, Limburg H, Foster A. Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS One 2017;12:1–13.

22. Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1492–1499.

23. Wu M. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Kunming, China. Commun Eye Heal 2007;20:10.

24. Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, Schlenther G, Naidoo KS, Resnikoff S, et al. Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:728–738.

25. Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal 2017;5:e888–e897.

26. MoHFW. National programme for control of blindness | National Health Portal of India. Available from: https://www.nhp.gov.in/national-programme-for-control-ofblindness_ pg.