International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

ISSN: 2476-3772

The latest discoveries in all areas of reproduction and reproductive technology.

 

Endometrial compaction can improve assisted reproductive technology outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles using hormone replacement therapy: A cross-sectional study

Published date: Apr 26 2025

Journal Title: International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Issue title: International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM): Volume 23, Issue No. 2

Pages: 141 – 152

DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v23i2.18484

Authors:

Shahrzad MoeinaddiniResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd

Saeideh Dashtisaeideh_dashti@yahoo.comResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd

Zahra Amini MajomerdResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd

Nooshin HatamizadehResearch and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd

Abstract:

Background: Endometrial compaction (EC) is an ultrasound evaluation method that may predict assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of EC on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles with hormone replacement therapy.

Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 women who underwent first or second frozen embryo transfer cycle at Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from June to October 2024 were included. Endometrial thickness was compared between the day of starting progesterone and embryo transfer day. Then participants were divided into 2 groups, no compaction and compaction group. Biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) were assessed between the 2 groups.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in biochemical, clinical, and OPR between the compaction and no compaction groups. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significantly higher pregnancy rates in EC 10–15% and > 15%. We found a significant influence of EC 10–15% (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, p = 0.01), and EC > 15% (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.002) on biochemical, clinical, and OPR, respectively.

Conclusion: EC after progesterone administration in hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles can increase biochemical, clinical, and OPR. The percentage of EC changes also influence the outcomes of these cycles.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology, Compaction, Endometrium, Embryo transfer, ART outcome

References:

[1] Committee on gynecologic practice. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography in evaluating the endometrium of women with postmenopausal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131: e124–129.

[2] Bu Z, Yang X, Song L, Kang B, Sun Y. The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2019; 17: 99.

[3] Riestenberg C, Quinn M, Akopians A, Danzer H, Surrey M, Ghadir Sh, et al. Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth rate in single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38: 407–412.

[4] Shibata S, Endo S, Nagai LAE, Kobayashi EH, Oike A, Kobayashi N, et al. Modeling embryo-endometrial interface recapitulating human embryo implantation. Sci Adv 2024; 10: eadi4819.

[5] Ojosnegros S, Seriola A, Godeau AL, Veiga A. Embryo implantation in the laboratory: An update on current techniques. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27: 501–530.

[6] (The writing group) for the participants to the 2022 Lugano RIF Workshop, Pirtea P, Cedars MI, Devine K, Ata B, Franasiak J, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: Reality or a statistical mirage?: Consensus statement from the July 1, 2022 Lugano Workshop on recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2023; 120: 45–59.

[7] Arian SE, Hessami K, Khatibi A, To AK, Shamshirsaz AA, Gibbons W. Endometrial receptivity array before frozen embryo transfer cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2023; 119: 229–238.

[8] Luo X, He Z, Ma R, Lin N, Li L, Li Y, et al. Narrative review of multifaceted approaches to managing recurrent implantation failure: Insights and innovations. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2024; 51: 87.

[9] Ma J, Gao W, Li D. Recurrent implantation failure: A comprehensive summary from etiology to treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 1061766.

[10] Casper RF. Frozen embryo transfer: Evidence-based markers for successful endometrial preparation. Fertil Steril 2020; 113: 248–251.

[11] Aboulghar MA, Aboulghar MM. Optimum endometrial thickness before embryo transfer: An ongoing debate. Fertil Steril 2023; 120: 99–100.

[12] Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 202–223.

[13] Mahutte N, Hartman M, Meng L, Lanes A, Luo ZC, Liu KE. Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: An analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2022; 117: 792–800.

[14] Olgan S, Dirican EK, Sakinci M, Caglar M, Ozsipahi AC, Gul SM, et al. Endometrial compaction does not predict the reproductive outcome after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: A prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45: 81–87.

[15] Kaye L, Rasouli MA, Liu A, Raman A, Bedient C, Garner FC, et al. The change in endometrial thickness following progesterone exposure correlates with in vitro fertilization outcome after transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38: 2947–2953.

[16] Shah JS, Vaughan DA, Dodge LE, Leung A, Korkidakis A, Sakkas D, et al. Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: A prospective study. Hum Reprod 2022; 37: 980–987.

[17] Khan M, Strug M, Angress D, Young S, Lessey B, Lathi RB, et al. Prospective evaluation of endometrial compaction in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles and correlation with pregnancy outcomes in a subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 2024; 122: e40.

[18] Chen XT, Sun ZG, Song JY. Does endometrial compaction before embryo transfer affect pregnancy outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1264608.

[19] Zeadna A, Son WY, Moon JH, Dahan MH. A comparison of biochemical pregnancy rates between women who underwent IVF and fertile controls who conceived spontaneously. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 783–788.

[20] Dias Da Silva I, Wuidar V, Zielonka M, Pequeux C. Unraveling the dynamics of estrogen and progesterone signaling in the endometrium: An overview. Cells 2024; 13: 1236.

[21] Yaprak E, Şükür YE, Özmen B, Sönmezer M, Berker B, Atabekoğlu C, et al. Endometrial compaction is associated with the increased live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2023; 26: 550–556.

[22] Jin Z, Li J, Yang E, Shi H, Bu Z, Niu W, et al. Effect of endometrial thickness changes on clinical pregnancy rates after progesterone administration in a single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer cycle using natural cycles with luteal support for PGT-SRand PGT-M-assisted reproduction: A retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021; 19: 154.

[23] Ju W, Wei C, Lu X, Zhao S, Song J, Wang H, et al. Endometrial compaction is associated with the outcome of artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40: 1649–1660.

[24] De la Torre Perez E, Carratalá-Munuera MC, Castillo-Farfán JC, Lledó-Bosch B, Moliner-Renau B, Bernabeu-García A, et al. Impact of endometrial compaction on reproductive outcomes after cryotransfer of euploid embryos in a modified natural cycle: Protocol for a prospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1285040.

[25] Al-Lamee H, Stone K, Powell SG, Wyatt J, Drakeley AJ, Hapangama DK, et al. Endometrial compaction to predict pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024: hoae040.

[26] Zilberberg E, Smith R, Nayot D, Haas J, Meriano J, Barzilay E, et al. Endometrial compaction before frozen euploid embryo transfer improves ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2020; 113: 990–995.

[27] Haas J, Smith R, Zilberberg E, Nayot D, Meriano J, Barzilay E, et al. Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2019; 112: 503–509.

[28] Youngster M, Mor M, Kedem A, Gat I, Yerushalmi G, Gidoni Y, et al. Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: A prospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39: 1909–1916.